Open Source and Software Development Innovation

2010 ◽  
pp. 251-280
Author(s):  
Robert S. Friedman ◽  
Desiree M. Roberts ◽  
Jonathan D. Linton
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
New Product ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Management Perspective ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Software Development Management

It is beyond question how ubiquitous and powerful computing has become for commerce, communication, and culture. As the articles addressed in this chapter make clear, the development of software poses challenges to those with commercial concerns?those that build software and those that use it?as well as specific situations in which management and innovation theory is responsive also to nonproprietary software development. We begin with two articles by Boehm, arguably the most prominent voice in software engineering today. The first, with Ross (1989), introduces advances in theory to aid software project management, and the second (1991) takes a close look at risk management as it pertains to software development projects. Fichman and Kemerer (1997) present their research findings related to knowledge management in software process innovation management environments, while Nambisan and Wilemon (2000) explain the mutually advantageous bodies of knowledge that the realms of software development and new product development hold for one another. Fajar and Sproull (2000) consider software development management from a knowledge and team management perspective, and their findings have affinities with Farris et al.’s (2003) introduction of the Web of Innovation, which facilitates an organization’s e-knowledge management systems and their application to new product development.

scholarly journals Innovation Management to Sustain Competitive Advantage: A Qualitative Multi-Case Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Ghayth Tahat
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Business Strategy ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Research Question ◽  
New Product ◽  
Shared Knowledge ◽  
Organisational Capabilities ◽  
Innovative Capabilities

The significance of innovative capabilities and new product development (NPD) in marketing and business strategy innovation has been recognised by researchers and management. Researchers and practitioners have explored and evaluated the organisational capabilities and knowledge management, too. This current paper, however, represents inadequacy of connection between organisational capabilities, innovative capabilities, new product development and integrated shared knowledge. Furthermore, there is insufficient knowledge and data on the effect and the involvement of organisational capabilities and integrated shared knowledge to company's success, performance, and sustainability. This paper aimed at determining whether there is a connection between organisational capabilities, innovative capabilities, new product development and integrated shared knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and explore how organisational capabilities and shared knowledge impact and contribute to innovative capabilities, new product development and innovative management. This paper has empolyed a qualitative multiple-site case study through conducting one-on-one (personal) interviews as well as conducting in-depth interviews with key decision makers from innovative and technology companies located in Texas State in the USA. This paper attempts to answer the following key research question, namely: How do organisational capabilities and shared knowledge that influence innovative capability and new product development contribute to the company’s performance, success, and sustainability? NVivo 11 Qualitative Data Analysis Software was used to import and analyse the respondent interviews. The software (NVivo 11) was also used to determine the study findings through theme analysis. The paper key finding is that organisational capabilities and shared knowledge are linked and crucial for the success of innovative capabilities and new product development. A set of recommendations for future researchers is proposed.

scholarly journals Formal and Informal Communication in New Product Development Teams: The Mediation Effect of Team Trust

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-111
Author(s):  
Volkan Polat ◽  
Gary Lynn ◽  
Ali Akgün ◽  
Onur Emre
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
New Product ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Mediation Effect ◽  
Informal Communication ◽  
Holistic View ◽  
New Product Development Teams ◽  
Team Trust

New product development (NPD) projects are costly, and fragile against failures as compared to other structures. This study has a holistic view of team factors to examine their relationship with team communication. Communication contributes to technical and practical processes such as learning, new idea development, and creativity. Trust has become prominent by affecting outcomes and processes indirectly, and changing relationships within team. This paper attempted to offer a contribution to the technology and innovation management (TIM) literature by presenting a model for researchers and project managers to understand potential interrelationships among team level factors (team autonomy, stability, member experience, and empowerment), team trust, and team formal and informal communication in NPD teams.

Influential Factors for Team Reflexivity and New Product Development

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wann-Yih Wu ◽  
Adriana A. Amaya Rivas ◽  
Ying-Kai Liao
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
New Product ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Relationship Conflict ◽  
Cognitive Fit ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Conflict ◽  
Management Perspective ◽  
Cognitive Fit Theory

Despite the important influence of team reflexivity on new product development (NPD) success, a thorough analysis of its key antecedents, mediators, and moderators is lacking in the literature. Using cognitive fit theory, knowledge management perspective, justice theory, and self-verification theory, this study proposed that existing knowledge, task familiarity, and procedural justice are three of the vital factors that lead to NPD success by encouraging team reflexivity. This study also examined the effects of team conflict on team reflexivity and NPD success. Survey data were collected from 254 NPD team members, and these data were then analyzed using the PROCESS Macro from SPSS and the partial least squares (PLS) approach. The results of this study showed that the three aforementioned factors play a significant role in NPD success. The importance of team conflict was then examined, and the results showed that when relationship conflict is higher, the effect of team reflexivity on NPD success tends to be weaker.

Globalised Adoption of Knowledge Management in New Product Development: A Conceptual Framework from Project Management Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Bak Aun Teoh ◽  
Wei Hong Ling ◽  
Amlus Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
New Product ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Team Members ◽  
The Impact

The growth in new knowledge and technology has substantially increased the complexity of the projects that is strongly influencing the time, cost, and quality of the project management. Due to the volatility of the current market, the effectiveness of knowledge management (KM) could reduce the project uncertainties, project life cycle costs, and risks of new product development (NPD). Since NPD is regarded as the key to innovation due to its strong connection between the knowledge and core competence, the ways how the knowledge will be captured, created, and shared among the project teams is important to remain competitive in today's business and market competition. Hence, the modes of how they are created and shared between the project team members as well as the impact of KM towards NPD will be discussed in this paper. KM are normally created and transferred through the conversion between explicit and tacit knowledge, which can be further applied into the project management. Furthermore, the existing knowledge of the organisation can be evaluated by the actions of decision makers, hence, it is undoubted that a better knowledge can lead to measurable efficiencies in production and product development. The key success factors of KM that have been implemented will be discussed in this paper as well, which help to increase the probability of project success. Keywords: New Product Development; Project Management; Knowledge Management; Globalisation

Management of Knowledge in New Product Development in Portuguese Higher Education

2011 ◽  
pp. 149-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Manuel Mendes ◽  
Jorge F.S. Gomes ◽  
Bernardo Batiz-Lazo
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
New Product ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Knowledge Process ◽  
Product Development Project ◽  
Knowledge Intensive ◽  
Portuguese Higher Education

This chapter uses key concepts in the knowledge management literature to analyse the procedures and practices used by a team during a new product development project. More precisely, the knowledge process or knowledge cycle is used as a means to examine issues relating to knowledge identification, creation, storage, dissemination, and application in new product development. Results from the case study also suggest that the knowledge process may be valuable in assessing the structural elements of knowledge management, but fails to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the dynamics and complexities involved. This suggests that more elaborate models are needed to explain how knowledge is created, shared and used in knowledge-intensive processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document