The Fifth Evaluation Wave

Author(s):  
Hanne Kathrine Krogstrup ◽  
Nanna Møller Mortensen

With the shift towards new public governance, professionals' and citizens' experiences and knowledge are placed at the heart of public service design, implementation, and evaluation. There are thus beginning indications that the dominant evaluation and governance logic, including the notion that welfare services should be evidence-based and that the quality of public services is best secured using key performance indicators, are in the process of being challenged. Four waves of evaluation have diffused between 1965 and 2010, and a great deal suggests that new public governance, with co-production as the dominant organizational recipe, is carrying a new, fifth evaluation wave with it. The aim of this chapter is to provide a sober but tentative explanation of the content of this fifth evaluation wave. The description of the fifth wave evaluation is structured in respect to “informed evaluation,” which covers reflections on the evaluation domain, knowledge, values, and usage.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petri Virtanen ◽  
Jari Kaivo-oja

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address questions related to public service delivery. Specifically, the authors note that existing research relating to public services is usually based on a number of oversimplifications, and that a novel conceptual understanding of change management practices related to public services is necessary. As such, the authors base the argument on the observation that the notion of public services has evolved into one of service systems, which call for new kinds of conceptual and theoretical approaches in order to understand this transformational shift. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is intended to be inherently interdisciplinary – meaning that the authors discuss systemic governance challenges in a specific context (public service) relating this notion to a body of literature that is relevant to this context, though one which has not previously been used in this way (e.g. Modern Systems Theory, New Public Management and New Public Governance). This paper highlights the ongoing discussion on service-dominant logic and links these discussions to the framework of public services. The notion of public services is inherently under-theorised in the service science literature and thus presents a unique and important area for future inquiry. Findings – The paper provides three main conclusions. The first concerns the new understanding of public services as an embedded part of the service economy when looking at service delivery from the organisational viewpoint – and also from the viewpoint of service users. Public service systems operate in a world of open systems which are more or less difficult to govern and manage. Second, the emergent systemic governance changes will be both pervasive and profound. These changes cannot, however, be understood only in economic terms; only by adopting a wider societal standpoint can they be fully appreciated. Such changes include, for instance, gene technology, robotics, informatics and nanotechnology and they cover various technological fields. Third, systemic adaptability requires new leadership and management styles. Future governance, leadership and management models must therefore be agile and adaptive to complex changes. Practical implications – Based on this paper, potential future research topics include, analysing the role of public services as a delivery mechanism for public policies from the perspective of the coherence of public policies, to leadership models, forecasting methods and decision-making in service systems, the capacity of public service systems to adapt to systemic governance challenges, co-ordination in service organisations and service systems, service delivery mechanisms adopted at the service organisation level, touch-points between service staff and service users and the accountability functions of public service systems. Originality/value – Public service systems clearly face new challenges, challenges that are not adequately addressed by the currently dominant paradigmatic approaches such as NPM and New Public Governance. The connection between the challenges posed by systemic governance and their impact on public service systems has not been adequately analysed thus far, either theoretically or empirically.


Author(s):  
Maik Brinkmann

Blockchain technology and New Public Governance represent promising concepts for various researchers. As such, both concepts offer the vision of an altered relationship between public administration and its non-public actors by emphasizing a strong position of non-public actors for public service delivery. This research aims to identify the relevance of New Public Governance to leading blockchain implementations in the European public sector. For this purpose, both topics are combined in an explorative analysis. The analysis leverages an adapted analysis framework designed for this research effort to structure the expectations around New Public Governance. Qualitative interviews with multiple key stakeholders of blockchain implementations projects were conducted to understand the actual impact of blockchain on the actor?s relationships for public service delivery. This article presents the findings to this question and concludes that the use of blockchain has the changed actor relationships only in parts. Consequently, the author finally draws attention to the importance of blockchain governance and blockchain regulation for further developing the relationships of public administrations and their non-public counterparts.


Author(s):  
Chaiyanant Panyasiri

The main purpose of this article is to explore the competing concepts and perspectives in modern Public Management literatures including: New Public Management (NPM), New Public Governance (NPG) and New Public Service (NPS) and to compare the viability of these concepts toward public sectors of Thailand. The method of study relies mostly on documentary research on influential academic writings from well-known Public Administration theorists. This article explores these modern PA concepts in terms of rationale, assumptions, discursive aspects, evolution and development, strengths and limitations, applicability and so on.The result of the study shows dimensional comparison between various contemporary public management perspectives, including NPM, NPG and NPS in their theoretical backgrounds, perspectives and solutions on public governance in Thailand. Based on the results of the study, to properly adopt these competing modern Public Management concepts, Thailand should pursue a “hybrid” style of public management consisting of all elements from those three modern PA perspectives namely, NPM, NPG and NPS, plus Thai national value of moral and professionalism. The key to the sustainability of Thailand is to retain traditional value that is proven to be relevant and supportive of the responsive and participating form of public governance and to keep up with the postmodernist characteristics of the 21st century.


Populasi ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bevaola Kusumasari

The new public service recognizes that those who interact with government are not simply called customers but rather citizens. In government, citizens are not only customers, they are owners of the government, therefore citizens decide what is so important that the government will do. Today, citizens expect public services to meet standards not only such as timeliness and reliability in getting the service but also they should do the services be delivered fairly and with attention to fiscal responsibility as well. More important, citizens contemplate to have the opportunity to influence the services they receive as well as the quality of those services.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter Van Dooren ◽  
Tom Willems

NPM- flavoured accountability regimes in many instances stifle innovation rather than foster it. Today, New Public Governance (NPG) creates new challenges for indicator-based accountability systems. NPG raises questions on how to reform indicator-based accountability to make it work in complex multi- actor settings. What is the use of performance indicators when dealing with unruly problems? How to stimulate innovation without calling accountabil- ity in itself into question? This chapter proposes some prospective directions based on a critical analysis of indicator-based accountability.


Author(s):  
Urszula Kobylińska

W Stanach Zjednoczonych, Europie Zachodniej i Australii coraz częściej podkreśla się znaczenie bezpośredniego angażowania obywateli w procesy planowania i świadczenia innowacyjnych usług publicznych przy wykorzystaniu koncepcji koprodukcji (co-production). Koprodukcja zakłada, że mieszkańcy/obywatele angażują własny czas i wysiłek w wytwarzanie usług publicznych, z których sami będą korzystać. Eksplorowanie koprodukcji staje się coraz bardziej zaawansowane dla szerokiego grona badaczy z obszaru zarządzania w usługach publicznych. W 2006 roku czasopismo „Public Management Review” opublikowało specjalny numer pt. „Co-Production. The Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services”, vol. 8 (4). Znaczna część badań została również podjęta przez J. Alforda w Australii i innych krajach anglosaskich. W 2012 r. opublikowano zbiór artykułów w „New Public Governance”, Third Sector and Co-Production, tom opublikowany przez Routledge. Ożywienie zainteresowań akademickich w obszarze koprodukcji zauważalne jest po przyznaniu w 2009 r. nagrody Nobla w dziedzinie ekonomii nieżyjącej już Elinor Ostrom za pracę nad analizą dóbr powszechnych (publicznych) oraz rolą użytkowników i ich stowarzyszeń w produkcji takich dóbr. Koncepcja koprodukcji wpisuje się obecnie w nurt współczesnego innowacyjnego zarządzania publicznego, o czym świadczy wzmożone zainteresowanie badaczy tego tematu w ostatnich latach. Artykuł ma na celu analizę stanu badań nad zagadnieniem koprodukcji oraz zidentyfikowanie głównych obszarów badawczych związanych z tą tematyką. Artykuł powstał na podstawie systematycznego przeglądu literatury, który obejmował między innymi wyłonienie podstawowej literatury i selekcję publikacji, analizę bibliometryczną oraz analizę treści. Wyniki przeprowadzonych badań wskazują, iż koprodukcja innowacyjnych usług publicznych jest zagadnieniem wciąż nowym, słabo rozpoznanym w literaturze przedmiotu, bez solidnej podbudowy metodologicznej i mogącym stanowić aktualny i ciekawy obszar badawczy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document