Analyzing Telework, Trustworthiness, and Performance Using Leader-Member Exchange

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Brown Sr.
Keyword(s):  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
And Performance

Differentiatie door coaches binnen amateursportteams: terecht of onterecht?

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim van Breukelen ◽  
Wendy Wesselius
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
Working Relationships ◽  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Sports Teams ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Lmx Theory ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Relevant Topic ◽  
And Performance

Differential treatment by coaches of amateur sports teams: right or wrong? Differential treatment by coaches of amateur sports teams: right or wrong? J.W.M. van Breukelen & W. Wesselius, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 20, November 2007, nr. 4, pp. 427-444 A central assumption in the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory is that leaders do not adopt a single style towards all members of their work unit, but treat the various team members differently. This may result in different kinds of working relationships between the leader and the various members ranging from formal to intense. The effects of these different LMX relationships are visible in important outcome variables such as job satisfaction and performance. Not only in working organizations but also in the context of sports differential treatment by the coach seems a relevant topic. In this article we describe the results of a field study among the players (N = 218) of 21 amateur sports teams. Firstly, we investigated on which aspects the coaches of these teams differentiated between the various team members and how these incidents of differential treatment were experienced by the players in terms of justice and fairness. In addition, we analyzed whether the frequency and evaluation of differential treatment was related to the players' enthusiasm and to team atmosphere and team performance. Social differentiation was appreciated less than task differentiation. Especially task differentiation proved to be important for team performance.

scholarly journals Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Martin ◽  
Yves Guillaume ◽  
Geoff Thomas ◽  
Allan Lee ◽  
Olga Epitropaki
Keyword(s):  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
And Performance

scholarly journals Leader-member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 12416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Martin ◽  
Yves R. F. Guillaume ◽  
Geoff Thomas ◽  
Allan Lee ◽  
Olga Epitropaki
Keyword(s):  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
And Performance

The impact of leader-member exchange on knowledge sharing and performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Sharifkhani ◽  
Javad Khazaei Pool ◽  
Sobhan Asian
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX), knowledge sharing and performance. Design/methodology/approach To reach the objective, a sample was used which consisted of some oil and gas companies in Singapore with experience in balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives. The partial least-squares structural equation modeling approach was used to test the model. Findings The results showed that LMX affects knowledge sharing and performance positively and meaningfully. Moreover, knowledge sharing affects performance. Originality/value An integrated model of LMX, knowledge sharing and performance was tested in the oil and gas industry. The combination of a developed country context and the significance of LMX enhances the contextual contribution of the paper.

Is More Feedback Seeking Always Better? Leader-Member Exchange Moderates the Relationship Between Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Performance

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 2195-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Wai Lam ◽  
Kelly Z. Peng ◽  
Chi-Sum Wong ◽  
Dora C. Lau
Keyword(s):  
Performance Standards ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Proactive Behavior ◽  
Feedback Seeking ◽  
Multilevel Research ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Seeking Behavior ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Relationship

Feedback is information made available to employees in their work environment, whereas feedback-seeking behaviors (FSBs) help employees to evaluate proactively whether their work has met performance standards and their behavior is considered appropriate. Prior studies have provided a perspective on how the feedback-seeking contexts affect the emergence and development of FSBs. In this study, we extend that perspective by investigating when FSBs affect job performance so that we can understand whether more feedback seeking is always better. Adopting the relational view of leadership, we hypothesize that the FSB-performance relationship should be stronger for employees with low leader-member exchange (LMX) and in groups with low aggregate LMX and low LMX differentiation. Using a multilevel research design and a sample of 379 teachers in 25 groups, we find support for most of our hypotheses. We discuss the implications of the study for the FSB and the proactive behavior literature and suggest avenues for future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document