Identify Safety Climate Factors of Express Items Based on Factor Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 409-410 ◽  
pp. 1102-1105
Author(s):  
Biao Hu ◽  
Hui Ying Feng ◽  
Xiao Yu Zhang

Take safety climate for express items security, identify express items security problems from the perspective of frontline staff and propose the improvement measures,it will maybe help the managers deal with express items security problems better.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Alex Opoku ◽  
George Ofori ◽  
Mohamed Shaik Honnurvali ◽  
Messaoud Saidani ◽  
Tariq Umar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 180-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazmimi Kasim ◽  
Che Rosmani Che Hassan ◽  
Mahar Diana Hamid ◽  
Sina Davazdah Emami ◽  
Mahmood Danaee

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Palupi Restuputri ◽  
M Syahban Giraldi ◽  
Shanty Kusuma Dewi ◽  
Ilyas Masudin ◽  
Uci Yuliati

This article aims to measure the application of occupational safety and health using Cooper's Reciprocal Safety Culture Model and Confirmatory Factor Analysis method.  The objective function of this article is to find out the aspects of safety culture that have been implemented by companies. A questionnaire was circulated to staff on the company's production floor as part of this study. The results of the questionnaire recapitulation were then analyzed using the confirmatory factor analysis method. Based on the score calculation results and the category determination build on the questionnaire scores on each dimension of the safety culture applied to the Steel Company, the safety climate value of 55.58 is obtained, which is on a 'quite good' scale. The safety behaviour value of 44, 89 is included on a 'quite good' scale, the safety management system value of 22.04 is on a 'poor' scale, and the safety culture value of 40.83 is on the 'quite good' scale. With these results, it is essential to make improvements to the safety culture in the company, especially in the dimensions of the safety management system, which is on the 'quite good' scale.


Author(s):  
Dr Taufiq Ihsan ◽  
◽  
Dr Dita Sophy Sakdiah ◽  
Rinda Andhita Regia ◽  
Dr Vioni Derosya ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Tariq Umar ◽  
Charles Egbu ◽  
George Ofori ◽  
Mohamed Shaik Honnurvali ◽  
Messaoud Saidani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Kjetil Larsen ◽  
Sarah Hean ◽  
Atle Ødegård

Purpose Interprofessional collaboration is necessary for handling the complex psychosocial needs of prisoners. This collaboration must be addressed to avoid high recidivism rates and the human and societal costs linked to them. Challenges are exacerbated by a linear approach to handling prisoners’ problems, silo working between welfare agencies and professional boundaries between frontline workers. There are few adequate theoretical frameworks and tools to address these challenges in the prison context. The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions that frontline staff working in Norwegian prison facilities have regarding interprofessional collaboration in providing mental health services for prisoners. Design/methodology/approach This study had a non-experimental, cross-sectional design to explore perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in a prison context. Descriptive and multifactorial analyses (exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis) were used to explore the data. Findings The analysis showed that three factors, communication, organizational culture and domain, explained 95% of the variance. Results are discussed using relational coordination, as well as the conceptual PINCOM model, as a theoretical framework. Originality/value Few studies explicitly explore collaboration between professionals in mental health and prison services despite its being a prerequisite to achieving sufficient services for prisoners. To our knowledge, this current study is one of the first in Norway to explore collaboration in a prison context by analysing quantitative data and focusing on frontline workers perception of the phenomenon.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidah Zakaria ◽  
Che Rosmani Che Hassan ◽  
Mahar Diana Hamid ◽  
Ezrin Hani Sukadarin

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e028666
Author(s):  
Gheed Al Salem ◽  
Paul Bowie ◽  
Jill Morrison

ObjectiveAs healthcare organisations endeavour to improve the quality and safety of their services, there is increasing recognition of the importance of building a culture of safety to promote patient safety and improve the outcomes of patient care. Surveys of safety culture/climate have not knowingly been conducted in Kuwait public hospitals, nor are valid or reliable survey instruments available for this context. This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the HSOPSC (Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture) tool in Kuwaiti public hospitals in addition to constructing an optimal model to assess the level of safety climate in this setting.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThree public hospitals in Kuwait.ParticipantsAbout 1317 healthcare professionals.Main outcome measureAn adapted and contextualised version of HSOPSC was used to conduct psychometric evaluation including exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis reliability and correlation analysis.Results1317 questionnaires (87%) were returned. Psychometric evaluation, showed an optimal model of eight factors and 22 safety climate items. All items have strong factor loadings (0.42–0.86) and are theoretically related. Reliability analysis showed satisfactory results (α >0.60).ConclusionsThis is the first validation study of a standardised safety climate measure in a Kuwaiti healthcare setting. An optimal model for assessing patient safety climate was produced that mirrors other international studies and which can be used for measuring the prevailing safety climate. More importance should be attached to the psychometric fidelity of safety climate questionnaires before extending their use in other healthcare culture and contexts internationally.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Zaheer ◽  
Liane Ginsburg ◽  
You-Ta Chuang ◽  
Sherry L. Grace

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document