Corpus-Based Study on Explicitation of Personal Pronouns in Chinese-English Translation

2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 283-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Ping Tong

This paper explores the explicitation strategy (one of the translation universals) in the political text .We adopt the quantitative and qualitative methods in the present study with the help of the self-compiled corpus to detect if the explicitation strategies of personal pronouns is prominent in the Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume III (1982-1992). It is found that the percentage of the personal pronouns were added or explicated purposely all together come to all most 31% compared with the total number of 5024 aligned sentences in the corpus.

2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 298-301
Author(s):  
Yu Ping Tong

Many researchers try to detect the application of explicitation in the literature text but there are great limitation in the political text .The purpose of this research is to detect the prominence of explicitation strategies in Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume III (1982-1992) with the help of the Chinese English parallel corpus, both quantitative and qualitative methods are adopted. It is found that in the target text the percentage of the connective words of reason and result which were added or explicated comes to 21.96%.


Journalism ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 146488491989412
Author(s):  
Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques ◽  
Camila Mont’Alverne ◽  
Isabele Mitozo

The article investigates how Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo – two of the leading Brazilian quality newspapers – expressed their editorial positions on the impeachment of the ex-president Dilma Rousseff. The comparative study encompasses quantitative and qualitative methods to examine 506 editorial texts published between 2015 and 2016. By using Content Analysis, the research found out that Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo take different positions along the process: each newspaper presents particular arguments to justify the impeachment’s legitimacy; regarding the solution for the political situation, O Estado de S. Paulo fully supports the impeachment, while Folha de S. Paulo asks for the then president and her vice-president to resign. In the end, both organizations agree in their editorials that Rousseff has to be removed from office. At the same time, Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo try to avoid being seen as actors conspiring against democracy, which makes them dispute whether Rousseff’s impeachment was or not a coup. This research provides the opportunity to investigate to what extent journalism loosens its place as a watchdog to behave as a demanding actor.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Morawski

Working in the long historical shadow of what has been taken to be debates between quantitative and qualitative methods, Osatuke and Stiles (2011), Westerman (2011), and Yanchar (2011) seek to move beyond those debates and even the various détentes posed in mixed-methods research. Their projects can be assessed in terms of this seemingly permanent shadow and also within a broader framing of the political, ethical, epistemic, and ontological stakes that abide in methodological decisions. Taking a broad historical and meta-theoretical perspective illuminates both the boldness and the limitations of the three papers. Especially notable are their procedures for abandoning the Archimedean distanced observational stance, replacing it with intersubjective, relational processes of knowledge seeking.


Author(s):  
Patricia Bou-Franch

Abstract This paper approaches the study of conflict through an examination of Spanish metapragmatic labels and comments of impoliteness on Twitter. The aim is twofold. It first aims to confirm the attributed importance of the label maleducado /ill-mannered in the specific context of Twitter and of digital discourse more generally, on quantitative and comparative grounds; then, it investigates this label, and the metapragmatic comments where it occurred, in a contextualized corpus of tweets compiled during the political campaign of Spain’s General Elections of April 28, 2019. The study draws from five ad hoc corpora specifically compiled from Twitter, and a general corpus of Spanish digital discourse provided by Sketch Engine. The analysis adopts a corpus-based metapragmatic approach, which combines quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings revealed that maleducado was the most frequent metapragmatic label under scrutiny in the Twitter corpora and motivated the subsequent study of lay conceptualizations of this term.


Author(s):  
Robert Elgie

The predominant methodologies that are used in the study of the political executive are closely linked to the various approaches that have been applied in this domain. The intellectual history of the study of political executives shows the familiar evolution from the ‘old’ institutionalism via behavioralism to varieties of ‘new’ institutionalism, without any approach being replaced completely by another, resulting in more methodological pluralism than ever before. Each of these quantitative and qualitative methods has its own strengths and weaknesses, but to a greater or lesser extent they share several problems concerning the material they use. Most notably, the very nature of political executives brings with it severe limitations to data availability. This chapter ends with a plea for more systematic attention to methodological issues such as case selection, and with suggestions for new methodological techniques that may help improve the validity of the conclusions that scholars wish to draw about the political executive.


Aldaba ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Luz Helena Idrobro Bedoya

En esta investigación se pretende determinar cuáles son los aspectos socio-culturales más relevantes de los ciudadanos de Melilla que inciden en su comportamiento político en las elecciones generales. Por tanto, se analizará cómo los ciudadanos de Melilla cambian sus intereses políticos dependiendo de las elecciones y las fuerzas políticas que confluyan en ellas. De esta forma, la investigación se centra en las dos últimas elecciones Generales, proponiendo el estudio de la problemática melillense desde ópticas politológicas y sociológicas a través de la utilización de métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos, centrando el interés en las comunidades más representativas de la ciudad (católicos y musulmanes). Recogiendo con ello, la realidad y caracterización de una población multicultural que coexiste.This research aims to determine which are the most relevant sociocultural aspects of the citizens of Melilla affecting their political behavior in the general elections. Therefore, we will analyze how the citizens of Melilla change their political interests depending on the elections and the political forces that join them. In this way, the research focuses on the two last General elections, proposing the study of the Melilla issue from optical of political science and sociology using quantitative and qualitative methods, focusing the interest in the most representative of the city (Catholics and Muslim) communities. Collecting this reality and characterization of a multicultural population coexisting.


2017 ◽  
pp. 29-42
Author(s):  
Aldo Pavan ◽  
Isabella Fadda

Accounting research has a speculative and normative tradition. Starting at the beginning of the 1970s, empirical methodologies gained prominence and the boundaries of accounting disciplines have become uncertain. Quantitative and qualitative methods tend to overwhelm the accounting and business objects; often they are only suitable to deal with past and narrow phenomena. Empirical methodologies need reference theories, coming from other disciplines and particularly economics and sociology. In this context, it is questioned if accounting research does exist anymore and if it is relevant to the business world. Some scholars have begun to wonder whether it would be appropriate to revalue normative approaches in order to conduct a type of research which is useful to the society and allows the preservation of specific accounting knowledge. A necessity emerges to come back to the prominence of business and accounting issues over methodologies and sociological theories. Research should be directed to tackle wide and current phenomena, not just the narrow and past ones. Speculative thinking has to be reassessed and empirical findings should be used to strengthen it as starting premises. Explaining phenomena is not enough; empirical research has to go beyond its findings; the emphasis should be shifted to the drawing of policy recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document