A New Method of Stress Linearization for Design by Analysis in Pressure Vessel Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 598 ◽  
pp. 194-197
Author(s):  
Hong Jun Li ◽  
Qiang Ding ◽  
Xun Huang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
New Method ◽  
Stress Distributions ◽  
Bending Stress ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Tensors ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Division 2

Stress linearization is used to define constant and linear through-thickness FEA (Finite Element Analysis) stress distributions that are used in place of membrane and membrane plus bending stress distributions in pressure vessel Design by Analysis. In this paper, stress linearization procedures are reviewed with reference to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 2 and EN13445. The basis of the linearization procedure is stated and a new method of stress linearization considering selected stress tensors for linearization is proposed.

Elastic-Shakedown Analysis of Axisymmetric Nozzles

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muscat ◽  
Donald Mackenzie
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Shakedown Analysis ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Elastic Shakedown ◽  
Division 2

An investigation of the shakedown behavior of axisymmetric nozzles under internal pressure is presented. The analysis is based on elastic-plastic finite element analysis and Melan’s lower bound shakedown theorem. Calculated shakedown pressures are compared with values from the literature and with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 2 primary plus secondary stress limits. Results obtained by the lower bound method are also verified by cyclic elastic-plastic finite element analysis.

Design of Ellipsoidal Heads Using Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Florizone
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Large Strain ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Spherical Shape ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Perfectly Plastic ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Design Calculations

Traditional design techniques result in excess material being required for ellipsoidal heads. The 2001 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 1, UG-32D and Section VIII Division 2, AD-204 limit the minimum design thickness of the heads. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case 2261 provides alternate equations that enable thinner head design thickness. VIII-2 Appendix 3 and 4 methods potentially could be used to further optimize the head thickness. All the equations in the code use one thickness for the entire head. On large diameter thin heads the center or spherical area is often thicker than the knuckle area due to the method of manufacture. Including this extra material in the design calculations results in an increase of the MAWP of large diameter thin heads. VIII-2, AD-200 of the code permits localized thinning in a circumferential band in a cylindrical shell. Applying these same rules to elliptical heads would permit thinning in the knuckle region as well. Engineers have powerful finite element analysis tools that can be used to accurately determine levels of plastic strain and plastic deformed shapes. It is proposed that VIII-2 Appendix 4 and 5 methods be permitted for the design of elliptical heads. Doing so would permit significant decreases in thickness requirements. Different methods of Plastic Finite Element Analysis (PFEA) are investigated. An analysis of a PVRC sponsored burst test is done to develop and verify the PFEA methods. Two designs based on measurements of actual vessels are analyzed to determine the maximum allowable working pressures (MAWP) for thick and thin heads with and without local thin regions. MAWP is determined by limit analysis, per VIII-2 4-136.3 and by two other proposed methods. Using Burst FEA, the calculated burst pressure is multiplied by a safety factor to obtain MAWP. Large deflection large strain elastic perfectly plastic limit analyses (LDLS EPP LL) method includes the beneficial effect of deformations when determining the maximum limit pressure. Elliptical heads become more spherical during deformation. The spherical shape has higher pressure restraining capabilities. An alternate design equation for elliptical heads based on the LDLS EPP LL calculations is also proposed.

Qualification of a Jacketed Vessel Using Finite Element Analysis

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogeshwar Hari ◽  
Ram Munjal ◽  
Chawki Obeid
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Ring Location ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Specific Configuration ◽  
Inner Vessel ◽  
Vessel Bottom

The main objective of this paper is to improve a jacketed vessel. The jacketed vessel is usually chosen to heat the contents of the vessel. The chamber or annulus contains fluid under pressure to heat the inner vessel contents. The initial over-all dimensions of the vessel are based on the capacity of the stored liquid. The design was in accordance with the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Div 1. The jacketed vessel bottom head and jacket bottom head are being improved to withstand internal and external design pressures. Bottom head of the jacket can be reinforced in one of the three ways, namely: (1) rings which are radial (these rings also create flow for the fluid); (2) attachment of the rings to the bottom jacket head with stays, since rings cannot be physically welded to the bottom jacket; or (3) there is a possibility, the new bottom head and jacketed head combination can be cast, but that would not be economically feasible. This leads to the following six configurations considered in this paper and they are: (1) internal pressure of 50 psi, (2) external pressure + vacuum pressure of 65 psi, (3) reinforcement with 5 rings with external pressure of 65 psi, (4) rings welded with the bottom jacket head with external pressure of 65 psi, (5) welded with stays on ring location (stay diameter of 1 inch) with external pressure of 65 psi, and (6) welded with stays on ring location (stay diameter of 1.5 inch) with external pressure of 65 psi. The pattern of stays chosen for this analysis is one of uniform distribution on ring locations, which are radially situated. The design dimensions based on Code sizing are used to recalculate the stresses for the jacket vessel. The dimensional jacketed vessel is modeled using STAAD III Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software. The design is found to be safe for the specific configuration considered herein with stays.

Comparison of Different Methodologies for Stress Analysis of Reinforcing Pads

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Guillot ◽  
Jack E. Helms
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Software Package ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Design Requirements

Finite element analysis is widely used to model the stresses resulting from penetrations in pressure vessels to accommodate components such as nozzles and man-ways. In many cases a reinforcing pad is required around the nozzle or other component to meet the design requirements of Section VIII, Division 1 or 2, of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code [1]. Several different finite element techniques are currently used for calculating the effects of reinforcing pads on the shell stresses resulting from penetrations for nozzles or man-ways. In this research the stresses near a typical reinforced nozzle on a pressure vessel shell are studied. Finite element analysis is used to model the stresses in the reinforcing pad and shell. The commercially available software package ANSYS is used for the modeling. Loadings on the nozzle are due to combinations of internal pressure and moments to simulate piping attachments. The finite element results are compared to an analysis per Welding Research Council Bulletin 107 [2].

Development of Design Rules for Nozzles in Pressure Vessels for the ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 2

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenning Cao ◽  
Les Bildy ◽  
David A. Osage ◽  
J. C. Sowinski
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Working Pressure ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Design Rules ◽  
Pressure Area ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Division 2

The theory behind the pressure-area method that is incorporated in the ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII-2 is presented in this paper. Background and insight to the nozzle rules of ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 2, Part 4, paragraph 4.5 are also provided. Recommendations for modifying the current nozzles rules, those published in ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 2, 2010 Edition, is given based on continuing research and development efforts. A comparison between experimental results, results derived from detailed finite element analysis (FEA), the rules prior to the VIII-2 Rewrite (2004 Edition), and the rules in VIII-2 are provided in terms of a design margin and permissible maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) computed with the design rules. A complete description of the theory including a commentary and comparison to experimental results is provided in WRC529 [1].

An Approach to Derive Primary Bending Stress From Finite Element Analysis for Pressure Vessels and Applications in Structural Design

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingjun Gao ◽  
Xiaohui Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Shi ◽  
Junhua Dong
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Engineering Application ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Bending Stress ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

An important issue in engineering application of the “design by analysis” approach in pressure vessel design is how to decompose an overall stress field obtained by finite element analysis into different stress categories defined in the ASME B&PV Codes III and VIII-2. In many pressure vessel structures, it is difficult to obtain PL+Pb due to the lack of information about primary bending stress. In this paper, a simple approach to derive the primary bending stress from the finite element analysis was proposed with application examples and verifications. According to the relationship of the bending stress and applied loads or the relationship of the bending stress and displacement agreement, it is possible to identify loads causing primary bending stress for typical pressure vessel structures. By applying the load inducing primary bending stress alone and necessary superposition, the primary bending stress and corresponding stress intensity PL+Pb can be determined for vessel design, especially for axisymmetric problems.

scholarly journals Comparison of Tooth- and Bone-Borne Appliances on the Stress Distributions and Displacement Patterns in the Facial Skeleton in Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion—A Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1152
Author(s):  
Rafał Nowak ◽  
Anna Olejnik ◽  
Hanna Gerber ◽  
Roman Frątczak ◽  
Ewa Zawiślak
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Stress Distributions ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Maxillary Constriction

The aim of this study was to compare the reduced stresses according to Huber’s hypothesis and the displacement pattern in the region of the facial skeleton using a tooth- or bone-borne appliance in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). In the current literature, the lack of updated reports about biomechanical effects in bone-borne appliances used in SARME is noticeable. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used for this study. Six facial skeleton models were created, five with various variants of osteotomy and one without osteotomy. Two different appliances for maxillary expansion were used for each model. The three-dimensional (3D) model of the facial skeleton was created on the basis of spiral computed tomography (CT) scans of a 32-year-old patient with maxillary constriction. The finite element model was built using ANSYS 15.0 software, in which the computations were carried out. Stress distributions and displacement values along the 3D axes were found for each osteotomy variant with the expansion of the tooth- and the bone-borne devices at a level of 0.5 mm. The investigation showed that in the case of a full osteotomy of the maxilla, as described by Bell and Epker in 1976, the method of fixing the appliance for maxillary expansion had no impact on the distribution of the reduced stresses according to Huber’s hypothesis in the facial skeleton. In the case of the bone-borne appliance, the load on the teeth, which may lead to periodontal and orthodontic complications, was eliminated. In the case of a full osteotomy of the maxilla, displacements in the buccolingual direction for all the variables of the bone-borne appliance were slightly bigger than for the tooth-borne appliance.

scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis of Skirt to Shell Junction in a Pressure Vessel

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (25) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deepali Mathur ◽  
Mandar Sapre ◽  
Chintan Hingoo ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Element Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document