Effect of Ethanol-Coconut Oil Methyl Ester on the Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics of a High-Pressure Common-Rail DI Engine

2014 ◽  
Vol 663 ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.G. How ◽  
H.H. Masjuki ◽  
M.A. Kalam ◽  
Y.H. Teoh
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Methyl Ester ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Combustion Characteristics ◽  
Common Rail ◽  
Brake Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Smoke Opacity ◽  
High Pressure Common Rail

The effects of using ethanol as additive to biodiesel-diesel blends on engine performance, emissions and combustion characteristics was investigated on a four-cylinder, turbocharged and high-pressure common-rail direct injection diesel engine. Three test fuels have been compared: baseline diesel, coconut oil methyl ester (CME) with 20% of biodiesel by volume (B20) and 5% of ethanol and 20% of CME by volume (B20E5). The tests were performed in steady state conditions at 2000 rpm with 25%, 50% and 75% load setting conditions. The results indicate that higher brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency is observed when operating with B20 and B20E5 blend. B20E5 blend shows reduction in smoke opacity, CO and NOx emissions compared to baseline diesel fuel. In terms of combustion characteristics, B20E5 shows slightly higher in both of the peak pressure and peak of HRR at low engine load.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Performance, Emission, and Combustion Characteristics of a Common Rail Direct Injection Diesel Engine Powered with Three Different Biodiesel Blends

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5597
Author(s):  
K. M. V. Ravi Teja ◽  
P. Issac Prasad ◽  
K. Vijaya Kumar Reddy ◽  
N. R. Banapurmath ◽  
Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Electronic Control Unit ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Common Rail ◽  
Biodiesel Blends ◽  
Sustainable Solutions ◽  
Fuel Flexibility

Biodiesel is a renewable energy source which is gaining prominence as an alternative fuel over fossil diesel for different applications. Due to their higher viscosity and lower volatility, biodiesels are blended with diesel in various proportions. B20 blends are viable and sustainable solutions in diesel engines with acceptable engine performance as they can replace 20% fossil fuel usage. Biodiesel blends are slightly viscous as compared with diesel and can be used in common rail direct injection (CRDI) engines which provide high pressure injection using an electronic control unit (ECU) with fuel flexibility. In view of this, B20 blends of three biodiesels derived from cashew nutshell (CHNOB (B20)), jackfruit seed (JACKSOB (B20)), and Jamun seed (JAMNSOB (B20)) oils are used in a modified single-cylinder high-pressure-assisted CRDI diesel engine. At a BP of 5.2 kW, for JAMNSOB (B20) operation, BTE, NOx, and PP increased 4.04%, 0.56%, and 5.4%, respectively, and smoke, HC, CO, ID, and CD decreased 5.12%, 6.25%, 2.75%, 5.15%, and 6.25%, respectively, as compared with jackfruit B20 operation.

THE EFFECT OF ETHANOL, PETROL AND RAPESEED OIL BLENDS ON DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS

Transport ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gvidonas Labeckas ◽  
Stasys Slavinskas
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Rapeseed Oil ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Maximum Torque ◽  
Brake Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Brake Mean Effective Pressure ◽  
Smoke Opacity

The article deals with the testing results of a four stroke four cylinder, DI diesel engine operating on pure rapeseed oil (RO) and its 2.5vol%, 5vol% and 7.5vol% blends with ethanol (ERO) and petrol (PRO). The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of ethanol and petrol addition to RO on blend viscosity, percentage changes in brake mean effective pressure (bmep), brake specific fuel consumption (bsfc), the brake thermal efficiency (çe) of a diesel engine and its emission composition, including NO, NO2, NOX, CO, CO2, HC and the smoke opacity of exhausts. The addition of 2.5, 5 and 7.5vol% of ethanol and the same percentage of petrol into RO, at a temperature of 20 °C, diminish the viscosity of the blends by 9.2%, 21.3%, 28.3% and 14.1%, 24.8%, 31.7% respectively. Heating biofuels up to a temperature of 60 °C, diminishes the kinematic viscosity of RO, blends ERO2.5–7.5 and PRO2.5–7.5 4.2, 3.9–3.8 and 3.9–3.7 times accordingly. At a speed of 1400–1800 min‐1, bmep higher by 1.3% if compared with that of RO (0.772–0.770 MPa) ensures blend PRO2.5, whereas at a rated speed of 2200 min‐1 , bmep higher by 5.6–2.7% can be obtained when fuelling the loaded engine, ë = 1.6, with both PRO2.5–5 blends. The bsfc of the engine operating on blend PRO2.5 at maximum torque and rated power is respectively 3.0% and 5.5% lower. The highest brake thermal efficiency at maximum torque (0.400) and rated power (0.415) compared to that of RO (0.394) also suggests blend PRO2.5. The largest increase in NOXemissions making 1907 ppm (24.8%) and 1811 ppm (19.6%) compared to that of RO was measured from a more calorific blend PRO7.5 (9.99% oxygen) at low (1400 min‐1) and rated (2200 min‐1) speeds. The emission of carbon monoxide from blends ERO2.5–5 throughout the whole speed range runs lower from 6.1% to 32.9% and the smoke opacity of the fully loaded engine changes from 5.1% which is a higher to 46.4% which is a lower level if compared to the corresponding data obtained using pure RO. The CO2 emissions of carbon monoxide and the temperature of the exhausts generated by the engine running at a speed of 2200 min‐1 diminish from 7.8 vol% to 6.3vol% and from 500 °C to 465 °C due to the addition of 7.5vol% of ethanol to RO.

Analysis of the effect of variations in fuel line pressure in high-speed direct injection diesel engines, with high-pressure common rail fuel injection systems on heat release, cylinder pressure, performance, and NOx emissions

2005 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Wallace ◽  
J G Hawley
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Heat Release ◽  
Diesel Engines ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Common Rail ◽  
Injection Velocity ◽  
Engine Simulation ◽  
High Pressure Common Rail

This paper is a further development of work previously reported on a wholly analytical approach to heat release modelling and is applicable to high-speed direct injection (HSDI) diesel engines operating with high-pressure common rail fuel injection systems under conditions of predominantly mixing-controlled combustion. The key variable in this treatment is the fuel preparation or combustion rate factor WH which, in conjunction with the primary injection variables, i.e. rail pressure, injection velocity and duration, defines the shape and amplitude of the heat release curve. It was shown in a previous paper that by expressing the fuel preparation rate factor WH as a function of time rather than crank angle, i.e. WHt instead of WHθ, the former can be presented as a nearly linear function of the square of injection velocity, i.e. WHt is directly proportional to the kinetic energy of the injected fuel spray, the latter evidently being the primary influence on the rate of the fuel-air mixing process. The analytical treatment developed in the authors' previous paper then allows heat release rates in the engine, dQ/dθ, to be calculated over a wide range of engine speeds and loads, with the aid of the existing engine simulation code ODES (Otto diesel engine simulation) to predict the associated engine performance and emissions, without resorting to further engine testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document