Diversification, Industrial Synergy and Firm Performance of State-Owned Enterprises - Taking Coal Business Groups as an Example

2014 ◽  
Vol 687-691 ◽  
pp. 4609-4615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Min Sun ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Tao Cui
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Business Groups ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Unrelated Diversification ◽  
State Owned Enterprise ◽  
Related Diversification ◽  
Coal Enterprises ◽  
The Relationship

Diversified industrial combination of state-owned enterprise is often not optimal, it can also maintain in the industry boom, but once the main market atrophy, the entire firm’s development will be in trouble, such as coal business groups. To solve this problem, this paper use industrial synergy as an intermediary variable and develop the traditional dualism, which is the relationship between diversification and firm performance, to trialism, which are relationships among diversification, industrial synergy and firm performance and take coal enterprises listing Corporations as an example to analyze relationships of above three points. Results show vertical business synergy in related diversification and horizontal function synergy in unrelated diversification are all have a significant positive impact on firm performance. This conclusion is confirmed the important hypothesis in theory that industrial synergy will promote firm performance and has important practical significance to guide state-owned enterprises’ management practice.

scholarly journals Product diversification and large construction firm productivity: the effect of institutional environments in Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Azrai Azman ◽  
Carol K.H. Hon ◽  
Bo Xia ◽  
Boon L. Lee ◽  
Martin Skitmore
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Product Diversification ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Construction Firms ◽  
Unrelated Diversification ◽  
Construction Firm ◽  
Related Diversification ◽  
Generalised Method Of Moments ◽  
The Impact

PurposeMany large construction firms (LCFs) adopt product diversification (PD) to counter downturns and spread risks. However, no detailed information is available concerning the type of PD that improves their performance. In addition, it is still uncertain how much changes in institutional dimensions influence the effectiveness of PD. Therefore, the aim is to resolve this issue by establishing a model that shows the extent of this influence.Design/methodology/approachThe generalised method of moments (GMM) estimator is used to model the PD strategies of 86 LCFs in Malaysia over 14 years (2003–2016) and its impact on productivity and profitability performance.FindingsUnrelated diversification (UD) decreased firm performance in 2003–2016, while related diversification (RD) had a positive impact during the more liberal 2010–2016 phase. The models show that the impact of PD is highly dependent on changes in institutional dimensions.Practical implicationsFirstly, managers may adjust the type of PD and its level of diversification to improve firm performance. Secondly, they may devise PD strategies based on changes in institutional dimensions to maximise their effectiveness.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the literature by determining the optimal amount of PD (including RD and UD) and its impact on performance. Secondly, the study is the first to investigate the moderating relationship of the institutional dimensions of economic and regulatory institutions on PD-firm performance. Thirdly, the study is the first to explore the components of technical-scale-scope economies (movement towards and around the production frontier), this being crucial to the strategy that was only conjectured in previous studies.

The moderating effect of board size on the relationship between diversification and tourism firm performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1084-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Zheng ◽  
Henry Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Tourism Industry ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Diversification Strategy ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Unrelated Diversification ◽  
Diversification Strategies ◽  
Related Diversification ◽  
The Relationship

This study examines the effects of diversification strategy and board size on firm performance as well as the moderating effect of board size on the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance in the Chinese tourism industry from 2008 to 2015. The results show that related diversification positively influenced Chinese tourism firm performance, and unrelated diversification negatively influenced it. Board size was found to negatively moderate the relationship between related diversification and firm performance and to positively moderate the relationship between unrelated diversification and firm performance. In addition, the results imply that small boards are beneficial to Chinese tourism firms when both related and unrelated diversification strategies are implemented.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION IMPROVES THE FIRM PERFORMANCE IN THE PAPER INDUSTRY IN CHINA

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
YONGLIANG YANG ◽  
LILI DING ◽  
YI LI
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Paper Industry ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Innovation Ability ◽  
The Relationship

This research develops a difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the relationship between environmental policy (The Measures for the Administration of Permits for the Discharge of Key Water Pollutants in the Huaihe and Taihu River Basins, MAPD) and the performance of firms involved in the paper and paper products industry (MPP) in China. Cost and innovation are introduced as mediators to explore the mediating effects. A firm-level dataset from 1998 to 2007 is adopted for empirical study. The findings support the positive role of the MAPD, and the average treatment effect is 0.016.The heterogeneity analysis shows that the MAPD exerts a positive impact on non-state-owned and small-scale enterprises, with coefficients of 0.018 and 0.021, respectively. Moreover, MAPD increases enterprise costs harming firm performance. On the other hand, it can promote firm performance by improving innovation ability.

The impact of service innovation on firm performance: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changli Feng ◽  
Ruize Ma ◽  
Lin Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Service Innovation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Quantitative Review ◽  
Content Type ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeWith the rise of service economy, many companies are attempting to gain a competitive advantage through service innovation. However, the existing research has not drawn consistent conclusions about the relationship between service innovation and firm performance. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to provide a quantitative review on the service innovation-performance relationship based on research findings reported in the extant literature.Design/methodology/approachStudies from 46 peer-reviewed articles were sampled and analyzed. A meta-analytic approach was adopted to conduct a quantitative review on the relationship between service innovation and firm performance, and the effects of any potential moderators were further explored.FindingsThe results found that service innovation has a significant positive impact on firm performance. Additionally, the relationship between service innovation and firm performance is influenced by measurement moderators (economic region and performance measurement), and contextual moderators (firm type, innovation type, customer factors and attitudes toward risk).Originality/valueThe meta-analysis has been used to explore the relationship between service innovation and firm performance, and the findings have contributed to the literature on service innovation, as well as providing future research directions.

scholarly journals The Impact of Financial Structure Towards Performance of Non-Financial Companies Listed on Amman Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-83
Author(s):  
Laith Fouad Alshouha ◽  
◽  
Wan Nur Syahida Wan Ismail ◽  
Mohd Zulkifli Mokhtar ◽  
Nik Mohd Norfadzilah Nik Mohd Rashid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Structure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Amman Stock Exchange ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between financial structure towards the financial performance of companies listed on Amman stock exchange (ASE) as one of the emerging economies. This paper adopted a panel data set of 88 non-financial companies listed on the ASE over a period of 10 years from 2009 to 2018. According to empirical results that there is significant evidence to support the fact that debt repaying ability (DRAB), managerial ownership (MANOW), and foreign ownership (FOROW) are positively related to firm performance. Otherwise, the findings revealed no evidence to support the impact of the financial structure ability (FSA) towards firm performance. Moreover, the findings support the fact that firm size (SIZ) has a positive impact on firm performance of companies listed on the ASE. On the other hand, (AGE) has a negative impact on firm performance, while (GROWTH) has no impact on firm performance. The current study encourages managers to maintain a good percentage of debt repaying ability and owners to grant shares as managers’ incentives, and also to attract foreign investors. Future studies, should try applying the current study on the financial sector.

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: does institutional quality matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Majdi Karmani ◽  
Rim Boussaada
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether institutional quality influences the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm performance (FP) relationship.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses a large sample of 814 European firms from roughly 2008 to 2017. In order to resolve the problem of endogeneity and heterogeneity the system generalized method of moment is performed.FindingsFirst, the effect of CSR on FP is simultaneously positive and significant for the economic, social and overall score based on an equal-weighted performance of four CSR pillars. Second, we found that the institutional quality matters, as corruption significantly decreases the FP, while government stability law and order exert a positive impact. Third, results suggest, similarly, that FP benefits from the interactional relationship between CSR and institutional quality. Finally, as for firm specifics, we found that the lagged performance and growth rate of sales significantly increase the European FP. However, FP is negatively sensitive to the leverage ratio.Research limitations/implicationsThis study aims to fill the gap in the CSR-FP interrelation and institutional context. Since we have a large number of firms (814) compared to a relatively small temporal dimension (10 years), the dynamic panel data analysis, and more precisely, the SGMM approach, is the most appropriate to resolve the problem of endogeneity and heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThe institutional environment affects the firm's CSR response and results. The strong institutional quality may result in increased regulatory pressures placed on the firm related to social responsibility compliance and can thereby enhance the CSR–FP relationship.Originality/valueTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that explored the relationship between CSR–FP and institutional quality in the European context. Indeed, this paper shows that institutional quality mediates the relationship between CSR practices and FP.

Managerial Ability and Firm Performance in Malaysia: Do Familiness and Foreignness of the CEOs Matter?

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Fen Chuah ◽  
Swee-Sim Foong
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Tobit Regression ◽  
Managerial Ability ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
Education Experience ◽  
The Relationship

This study examines whether the relationship between managerial ability and firm performance is driven by familiness and foreignness of the CEOs. We divide the sample of CEOs according to their familiness and foreignness and estimate CEOs abilities via DEA and Tobit regression. We then employed dynamic GMM panel estimator to address the endogeneity issues. Based on a sample of 361 firms in Malaysia over 2011–2015, we documented empirical evidence that managerial ability of local CEOs with foreign working or education experience are most positively related to Tobin’s Q, followed by local CEOs without foreign experience. We further found that local CEOs contribute to firm performance only if they are not family connected with the firm. Last, our findings also suggest that the presence of foreign CEOs improve the firm performance when they are nonfamily CEOs originated from high management practice countries.

The mediating role of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and firm performance in a multi-stakeholder environment

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Grekova ◽  
H.J. Bremmers ◽  
J.H. Trienekens ◽  
R.G.M. Kemp ◽  
S.W.F. Omta
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Environmental Innovation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Environmental Process ◽  
The Relationship

Nowadays, firms are increasingly challenged to bridge potentially conflicting economic interests of primary commercial stakeholders and sustainability demands from secondary non-commercial stakeholder groups. While a number of firms view investments in environmental management as disconnected from their value-creating activities, others have reported achieved cost efficiency and differentiation advantages. Prior research suggests that environmental innovation might be the missing link between environmental management and firm performance. However, the mediating effect of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and a firm's performance had not been empirically tested so far. Our paper provides a contribution by conducting an empirical investigation into this possible mediating effect. Although the presumed mediating role of environmental innovation suggests that it is influenced by internal environmental management, environmental innovation literature is especially concerned with the role of external stakeholders in environmental innovation. This study investigates the role of the engagement of stakeholders such as supply chain partners, industry, and public authorities in environmental impact reduction. We hypothesise that environmental innovation positively mediates the relationship between environmental management and firm performance, and that the engagement of stakeholders has a positive impact on environmental innovation. The research model was tested with a variance-based structural equation model using data from 90 Dutch food and beverage firms. The results confirm the positive mediating effect of environmental process innovation on the relationship between environmental management and cost efficiency advantage. Environmental product innovation contributes to a differentiation advantage but it is not significantly influenced by environmental management. So we could not support a positive mediating effect of environmental product innovation on the relationship between environmental management and differentiation advantage. Instead, environmental collaboration with supply chain partners has a strong positive impact on environmental product innovation. It also positively influences environmental process innovation but this influence is much weaker than the influence of internal environmental management. Our findings can assist managers in their decision making regarding the implementation of environmental innovations and environmental collaboration with external parties. The study is also relevant to policy makers as a tool to assess the appropriateness of their policy.

scholarly journals Does organizational innovation always lead to better performance? A study of firms in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Thuc Anh Phan
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Organizational Innovation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Interaction Terms ◽  
Workplace Organization ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between organizational innovation and performance of firms in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach Based on the literature review, the author proposed five hypotheses covering the relationships between different aspects of organizational innovation and firm performance. Data collected from a survey of 266 firms in Vietnam were analyzed to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings Two out of three aspects of organizational innovation, including “innovation in business practices” and “innovation in workplace organization,” are significantly positively associated with firm performance. However, there was no evidence to support the relationship between firm performance and the third organizational innovation aspect, “organizational innovation in external relations.” The results also show that the interaction terms among three aspects of organizational innovation do not have significant impacts on firm performance. Practical implications Firms in Vietnam should pay more attention to innovation in business practices and innovation in workplace organization since two aspects have clear positive influences on performance. Moreover, firms can perform each of the organizational innovation aspects independently or in parallel, as the implementation of organizational innovation in one aspect does not influence the impact on the firm performance of organizational innovation in other aspects. Originality/value This study provides important insights into the widely recognized yet little-researched relationship between organizational innovation and firm performance and concludes that organizational innovation has a positive impact on firm performance.

Influence of Family Ownership and Governance on Performance: Evidence from India

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215091988071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aman Srivastava ◽  
Shikha Bhatia
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Family Involvement ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Data Set ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Measures Of Performance

This study examines how firm performance is impacted by family ownership and governance in an emerging market. Employing a panel data set of listed companies from National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India for the period 2011–2017, this study analyses the relationship between family ownership and firm performance while controlling for variables like impact of external environment and characteristics of firms. The performance of firms is measured by accounting measures of performance and Tobin’s Q. The findings of this study suggest that family ownership and firm performance have a nonlinear relationship and family ownership has a positive impact on firm performance till a certain point and after that it starts affecting firm performance negatively. This study also finds that family involvement in governance positively affects the firm performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document