Performance Assessment of Slip Mode Frequency Shift (SMS) Islanding Detection Methods

2014 ◽  
Vol 699 ◽  
pp. 546-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Farid Sapar ◽  
Chin Kim Gan ◽  
Meysam Shamshiri ◽  
Anis Niza Ramani

The awareness concerning the grid connected Photovoltaic (PV) has become vital and a major concern nowadays. Islanding detection is one of the most dominant challenges for distributed generation system connected to the utility grid. In addition, islanding has not been a preferable option as it may pose safety hazard and may cause damage to power generation and power supply facilities as a result of unsynchronized re-closer. Therefore, the islanding detection techniques are needed to ensure safe and reliable system operation. One of the established islanding prevention methods is the Slip Mode Frequency Shift (SMS) islanding method, which has numerous advantages over the other techniques. This paper investigates the active islanding detection methods and specifically focused on the SMS islanding method. The results show that the SMS islanding method successfully detected an unintentional fault and managed to isolate the system within the prescribed time range.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manop Yingram ◽  
Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn

The mainly used local islanding detection methods may be classified as active and passive methods. Passive methods do not perturb the system but they have larger nondetection zones, whereas active methods have smaller nondetection zones but they perturb the system. In this paper, a new hybrid method is proposed to solve this problem. An over/undervoltage (passive method) has been used to initiate an undervoltage shift (active method), which changes the undervoltage shift of inverter, when the passive method cannot have a clear discrimination between islanding and other events in the system. Simulation results on MATLAB/SIMULINK show that over/undervoltage and undervoltage shifts of hybrid islanding detection method are very effective because they can determine anti-islanding condition very fast.ΔP/P>38.41% could determine anti-islanding condition within 0.04 s;ΔP/P<-24.39% could determine anti-islanding condition within 0.04 s;-24.39%≤ΔP/P≤ 38.41% could determine anti-islanding condition within 0.08 s. This method perturbed the system, only in the case of-24.39% ≤ΔP/P ≤38.41% at which the control system of inverter injected a signal of undervoltage shift as necessary to check if the occurrence condition was an islanding condition or not.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irvin J. Balaguer-Alvarez ◽  
Eduardo I. Ortiz-Rivera

Energies ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
José Antonio Cebollero ◽  
David Cañete ◽  
Susana Martín-Arroyo ◽  
Miguel García-Gracia ◽  
Helder Leite

Detection of unintentional islanding is critical in microgrids in order to guarantee personal safety and avoid equipment damage. Most islanding detection techniques are based on monitoring and detecting abnormalities in magnitudes such as frequency, voltage, current and power. However, in normal operation, the utility grid has fluctuations in voltage and frequency, and grid codes establish that local generators must remain connected if deviations from the nominal values do not exceed the defined thresholds and ramps. This means that islanding detection methods could not detect islanding if there are fluctuations that do not exceed the grid code requirements, known as the non-detection zone (NDZ). A survey on the benefits of islanding detection techniques is provided, showing the advantages and disadvantages of each one. NDZs size of the most common passive islanding detection methods are calculated and obtained by simulation and compared with the limits obtained by ENTSO-E and islanding standards in the function of grid codes requirements in order to compare the effectiveness of different techniques and the suitability of each one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document