High Speed Visualization of Pneumatic Conveying of Materials in Bypass System

2012 ◽  
Vol 508 ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Mark Glynne Jones ◽  
Bin Chen ◽  
Kenneth Charles Williams ◽  
Ahmed Abu Cenna ◽  
Ying Wang

Dense phase pneumatic conveying is preferable over dilute phase conveying in many industries as lower transport velocities are beneficial due to reduced attrition of the particles and reduced wear. However, dense phase conveying is critically dependent on the physical properties of the materials to be conveyed. For many materials which are either erosive or fragile, they do not exhibit the physical properties required to be conveyed reliably in a low velocity, dense phase flow regime. This can be serious problem in the food, chemical and pharmaceutical industries. One satisfactory approach which has been widely applied is the use of bypass systems. Bypass pneumatic conveying systems provide the capacity of transporting some materials that are not naturally suitable for dense phase flow. Bypass pneumatic conveying systems also provide a passive capability to reduce minimum particulate transport velocities. In this study, pneumatic conveying experiments were carried out in a 79 mm diameter main pipe with a 27 mm inner diameter bypass pipe with orifice plate flute arrangement. Alumina, fly ash and sand were conveyed in the tests. High speed camera visualization was employed to study the flow regimes of bypass pneumatic transport systems and investigate the mechanism of material blockage inhibition provided by these systems. For alumina and fly ash, it was found that particulate material blockages were inhibited in bypass systems due to the air penetration into the particulate volume as a result of orifice plate airflow resistance. For the bypass pneumatic conveying of sand, the splitting of a long plug into two smaller plugs was observed. One of the primary concerns of bypass system is the wear of the bypass line. Material such as alumina is inherently abrasive by nature. For internal bypass systems, there is limited ability to monitor the state of the inner bypass tube while in operation. The particle velocity in the pipeline has been measured from the high speed video of the flow. The experimental result also showed that the conveying velocity of bypass system is much lower when compared conventional single bore pipelines. Based on the models developed for the assessment of service life of pneumatic conveying pipelines, the thickness loss of the bypass pipe has been estimated. It has been estimated that for a 3mm bypass tube wall thickness, a wear hole is created in approximately 2.5 years for a particle velocity of 3 m/s and 4 months for a particle velocity of 10 m/s.

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongming Liu ◽  
Weilin Zhao ◽  
Xiansong Li ◽  
Hua Yi ◽  
Congling Bu

2011 ◽  
Vol 306-307 ◽  
pp. 1387-1392
Author(s):  
Wei Xiang Wu ◽  
Zong Ming Liu ◽  
Guang Bin Duan

The process of dense phase pneumatic conveying gypsum in stepped pipeline was simulated by using an Euler-Euler two fluid model of dense gas-particle two phase flow based on the kinetic theory of gas and granular. The simulation results showed dynamic pressure increased while static pressure decreased in the first two tapered pipe, but this trend became opposite in the last diffuser pipe. The gas and particle velocity both increased in the 80-65mm and 65-50mm tapered pipe, but decreased in 50-80mm diffuser pipe. In a short, the results showed that the simulation was consistent with the fact, which proved the feasibility of our simulation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 508 ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
Kenneth Charles Williams ◽  
Mark Glynne Jones ◽  
Ying Wang

Bypass pneumatic conveying systems provide a passive capability to reduce conveying velocity and therefore reduce attrition and abrasion in the process of conveying many fragile and erosive particulate solids. Because of these capabilities, bypass pneumatic conveying systems have been used in coal-fired power stations for removing fly ash for the last couple of decades. In bypass systems, the differential pressure between bypass pipe and main pipe as well as the pipeline pressure drop are two of most significant parameters as differential pressure represents the aeration mechanism within the pipeline while pressure drop is an essential parameter for bypass pneumatic conveying system design. In bypass systems, these two parameters are determined not only by the turbulent mode of the gas solids two-phase flow but also by the bypass configurations. The objective of this study was to experimentally investigate the differential pressure between bypass pipe and main pipe as well as the pressure drop during the bypass pneumatic conveying of fly ash. Pneumatic conveying tests in bypass systems and a conventional pipeline were carried out in this study. The bypass pipeline was a 79 mm diameter main pipe with a 27 mm inner diameter bypass pipe with orifice plate flute arrangement. Fly ash was discharged to the system from the bottom of a positive pressure blow tank. The receiving bin was mounted on load cells for measuring the mass accumulation. In order to monitor real time behavior of the system, pressure transmitters were used to measure the gauge pressure. Differential pressure transmitters were employed in the system for measuring the pressure difference between the bypass pipe and main pipe. Differential pressure results between bypass pipe and main pipe in the process of conveying fly ash showed that the pressure before the orifice plate in the bypass pipe was higher than that in main pipe as a result of orifice plate airflow resistance. Therefore, air came into main pipe and aerated the material continuously. The differential pressure also illustrated that the particulate may go into the bypass pipe as pressure in the bypass pipe after orifice plate is lower than that in main pipe. The pipeline pressure drop results also showed that pressure drop was higher than in the conventional system when using the same operating parameters due to the increase of friction. The influences of bypass configurations on pressure drop of bypass system were also discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Setia ◽  
S.S. Mallick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document