A Reliability Index Based Decoupling Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2012 ◽  
Vol 544 ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhong Chen ◽  
Hao Bo Qiu ◽  
Hong Yan Hao ◽  
Hua Di Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Decoupling Method ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Comparison Results

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) evaluates variation of output induced by uncertainties of design variables and results in an optimal design while satisfying the reliability requirements. However, its use in practical applications is hindered by the huge computational cost during the evaluation of structure reliability. In this paper, the reliability index based decoupling method is developed to improve the efficiency of probabilistic optimization. The reliability index is used to calculate the shifting vector in the decoupling process, due to its efficiency in evaluating violated probabilistic constraints. The computation capability of the proposed method is demonstrated using two examples, which are widely used to test RBDO methods. The comparison results show that the proposed method has the same accuracy as the existing methods, and it is also very efficient.

A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tu ◽  
K. K. Choi ◽  
Y. H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Special Cases

This paper presents a general approach for probabilistic constraint evaluation in the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Different perspectives of the general approach are consistent in prescribing the probabilistic constraint, where the conventional reliability index approach (RIA) and the proposed performance measure approach (PMA) are identified as two special cases. PMA is shown to be inherently robust and more efficient in evaluating inactive probabilistic constraints, while RIA is more efficient for violated probabilistic constraints. Moreover, RBDO often yields a higher rate of convergence by using PMA, while RIA yields singularity in some cases.

scholarly journals Reliability Based Design Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Genetic Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Seify Asghshahr
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Random Variables ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Form Analysis ◽  
Reliability Based Design

This paper introduces a new framework for reliability based design optimization (RBDO) of the reinforced concrete (RC) frames. This framework is constructed based on the genetic algorithm (GA) and finite element reliability analysis (FERA) to optimize the frame weight by selecting appropriate sections for structural elements under deterministic and probabilistic constraints. Modulus of elasticity of the concrete and steel bar, dead load, live load, and earthquake equivalent load are considered as random variables. Deterministic constraints include the code design requirements that must be satisfied for all the frame elements according to the nominal values of the aforementioned random variables. On the other hand, this framework provides the minimum required reliability index as the probabilistic constraint. The first-order reliability method (FORM) using the Newton-type recursive relationship will be used to compute the reliability index. The maximum inter-story drift is considered as an engineering demand parameter to define the limit-state function in FORM analysis. To implement the proposed framework, a mid-rise five-story RC frame is selected as an example. Based on the analysis results, increasing the minimum reliability index from 6 to 7 causes an 11 % increase in the weight of the selected RC frame as an objective function. So, we can obtain a trade-off between the optimized frame weight and the required reliability index utilizing the developed framework. Furthermore, the high values of the reliability index for the frame demonstrate the conservative nature of code requirements for interstory drift limitations based on the linear static analysis method.

A Hybrid Reliability Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po Ting Lin ◽  
Yogesh Jaluria ◽  
Hae Chang Gea
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Accurate Solution ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Hybrid Reliability

Reliability-based Design Optimization problems have been solved by two well-known methods: Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA). RIA generates first-order approximate probabilistic constraints using the measures of reliability indices. For infeasible design points, the traditional RIA method suffers from inaccurate evaluation of the reliability index. To overcome this problem, the Modified Reliability Index Approach (MRIA) has been proposed. The MRIA provides the accurate solution of the reliability index but also inherits some inefficiency characteristics from the Most Probable Failure Point (MPFP) search when nonlinear constraints are involved. In this paper, the benchmark examples have been utilized to examine the efficiency and stability of both PMA and MRIA. In our study, we found that the MRIA is capable of obtaining the correct optimal solutions regardless of the locations of design points but the PMA is much efficient in the inverse reliability analysis. To take advantages of the strengths of both methods, a Hybrid Reliability Approach (HRA) is proposed. The HRA uses a selection factor that can determine which method to use during optimization iterations. Numerical examples from the proposed method are presented and compared with the MRIA and the PMA.

scholarly journals Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Crane Metallic Structure Using ACO and AFOSM Based on China Standards

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoning Fan ◽  
Xiaoheng Bi
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Metallic Structure ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Uncertain Variables ◽  
Reliability Based Design

The design optimization of crane metallic structures is of great significance in reducing their weight and cost. Although it is known that uncertainties in the loads, geometry, dimensions, and materials of crane metallic structures are inherent and inevitable and that deterministic structural optimization can lead to an unreliable structure in practical applications, little amount of research on these factors has been reported. This paper considers a sensitivity analysis of uncertain variables and constructs a reliability-based design optimization model of an overhead traveling crane metallic structure. An advanced first-order second-moment method is used to calculate the reliability indices of probabilistic constraints at each design point. An effective ant colony optimization with a mutation local search is developed to achieve the global optimal solution. By applying our reliability-based design optimization to a realistic crane structure, we demonstrate that, compared with the practical design and the deterministic design optimization, the proposed method could find the lighter structure weight while satisfying the deterministic and probabilistic stress, deflection, and stiffness constraints and is therefore both feasible and effective.

Reliability-Based Design Optimization in X-Space Using Ensemble of Gaussian Reliability Analyses (EoGRA)

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po Ting Lin ◽  
Shu-Ping Lin
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Design Point ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Standard Normal

Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) algorithms have been developed to solve design optimization problems with existence of uncertainties. Traditionally, the original random design space is transformed to the standard normal design space, where the reliability index can be measured in a standardized unit. In the standard normal design space, the Modified Reliability Index Approach (MRIA) measured the minimum distance from the design point to the failure region to represent the reliability index; on the other hand, the Performance Measure Approach (PMA) performed inverse reliability analysis to evaluate the target function performance in a distance of reliability index away from the design point. MRIA was able to provide stable and accurate reliability analysis while PMA showed greater efficiency and was widely used in various engineering applications. However, the existing methods cannot properly perform reliability analysis in the standard normal design space if the transformation to the standard normal space does not exist or is difficult to determine. To this end, a new algorithm, Ensemble of Gaussian Reliability Analyses (EoGRA), was developed to estimate the failure probability using Gaussian-based Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) in the original design space. The probabilistic constraints were formulated based on each kernel reliability analysis for the optimization processes. This paper proposed an efficient way to estimate the constraint gradient and linearly approximate the probabilistic constraints with fewer function evaluations. Some numerical examples with various random distributions are studied to investigate the numerical performances of the proposed method. The results showed EoGRA is capable of finding correct solutions in some problems that cannot be solved by traditional methods.

Barrier Function Method in Reliability Based Design Optimization

2005 ◽  
Vol 297-300 ◽  
pp. 1882-1887
Author(s):  
Tae Hee Lee ◽  
Jung Hun Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Feasible Solution ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
User Requirement ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Reliability Method

In practical design applications, most design variables such as thickness, diameter and material properties are not deterministic but stochastic numbers that can be represented by their mean values with variances because of various uncertainties. When the uncertainties related with design variables and manufacturing process are considered in engineering design, the specified reliability of the design can be achieved by using the so-called reliability based design optimization. Reliability based design optimization takes into account the uncertainties in the design in order to meet the user requirement of the specified reliability while seeking optimal solution. Reliability based design optimization of a real system becomes now an emerging technique to achieve reliability, robustness and safety of the design. It is, however, well known that reliability based design optimization can often have so multiple local optima that it cannot converge into the specified reliability. To overcome this difficulty, barrier function approach in reliability based design optimization is proposed in this research and feasible solution with specified reliability index is always provided if a feasible solution is available. To illustrate the proposed formulation, reliability based design optimization of a bracket design is performed. Advanced mean value method and first order reliability method are employed for reliability analysis and their optimization results are compared with reliability index approach based on the accuracy and efficiency.

scholarly journals Efficient optimum safety factor approach for system reliability-based design optimization with application to composite yarns

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gh. Kharmanda ◽  
I. R. Antypas
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Safety Factor ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Implementation Framework ◽  
Reliability Level ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Convergence Stability

Introduction. The integration of reliability and optimization concepts seeks to design structures that should be both economic and reliable. This model is called Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO). In fact, the coupling between the mechanical modelling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational cost and weak convergence stability. Materials andMethods. Several methods have been developed to overcome these difficulties. The methods called Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA) are two alternative methods. RIA describes the probabilistic constraint as a reliability index while PMA was proposed by converting the probability measure to a performance measure. An Optimum Safety Factor (OSF) method is proposed to compute safety factors satisfying a required reliability level without demanding additional computing cost for the reliability evaluation. The OSF equations are formulated considering RIA and PMA and extended to multiple failure case.Research Results. Several linear and nonlinear distribution laws are applied to composite yarns studies and then extended to multiple failure modes. It has been shown that the idea of the OSF method is to avoid the reliability constraint evaluation with a particular optimization process.Discussion and Conclusions. The simplified implementation framework of the OSF strategy consists of decoupling the optimization and the reliability analyses. It provides designers with efficient solutions that should be economic satisfying a required reliability level. It is demonstrated that the RBDO compared to OSF has several advantages: small number of optimization variables, good convergence stability, small computing time, satisfaction of the required reliability levels.

scholarly journals A decoupling algorithm with first-order asymptotic integration for reliability-based design optimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 168781401879333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Huang ◽  
Tongguang Yang ◽  
Fangyi Li
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Asymptotic Integration ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
First Order Reliability Method ◽  
First Order ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliability Method

Conventional decoupling approaches usually employ first-order reliability method to deal with probabilistic constraints in a reliability-based design optimization problem. In first-order reliability method, constraint functions are transformed into a standard normal space. Extra non-linearity introduced by the non-normal-to-normal transformation may increase the error in reliability analysis and then result in the reliability-based design optimization analysis with insufficient accuracy. In this article, a decoupling approach is proposed to provide an alternative tool for the reliability-based design optimization problems. To improve accuracy, the reliability analysis is performed by first-order asymptotic integration method without any extra non-linearity transformation. To achieve high efficiency, an approximate technique of reliability analysis is given to avoid calculating time-consuming performance function. Two numerical examples and an application of practical laptop structural design are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Complex Problems With Multiple Design Points via Narrowed Search Region

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutian Wang ◽  
Peng Hao ◽  
Zhendong Guo ◽  
Dachuan Liu ◽  
Qiang Gao
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Risk Function ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Search Region ◽  
Complex Problems ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Training Samples ◽  
Gradient Based ◽  
Similar Accuracy

Abstract The expensive computational cost is always a major concern for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of complex problems. The performance of RBDO can be lowered by the inaccuracy of reliability analysis (RA) which is caused by multiple local optimums and multiple design points in highly non-linear space. In order to reduce the computational burden and guarantee the accuracy of RA (and thus to improve the RBDO performance), a global RBDO algorithm by adopting an improved constraint boundary sampling (GRBDO-ICBS) method is proposed. Specifically, the GRBDO-ICBS method first narrows the concerned search region by using a Kriging-based global search. The accuracies of the design points are verified by the expected risk function (ERF), and the corresponding inaccurate design points are added into training samples to update Kriging. Then a multi-start gradient-based sequential RBDO is carried out, which tries to find out all multiple design points in the concerned search region. The performance of GRBDO-ICBS is demonstrated by four examples. All results have shown that the proposed method can achieve similar accuracy as Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)-based RBDO but with a much lower computational cost.

An Efficient Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization Combined Sequential Optimization with Approximate Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao Quoc Doan ◽  
Guiping Liu ◽  
Can Xu ◽  
Minh Quang Chau
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Latin Hypercube Sampling ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Sequential Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Efficient Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Approximate Models

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) involves evaluation of probabilistic constraints which can be time-consuming in engineering structural design problems. In this paper, an efficient approach combined sequential optimization with approximate models is suggested for RBDO. The radial basis functions and Latin hypercube sampling are used to construct approximate models of the probabilistic constraints. Then, a sequential optimization with approximate models is carried out by the sequential optimization and reliability assessment method which includes a serial of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability assessment. Three numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document