scholarly journals Decreasing Delirium Through Music: A Randomized Pilot Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. e31-e38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sikandar H. Khan ◽  
Chenjia Xu ◽  
Russell Purpura ◽  
Sana Durrani ◽  
Heidi Lindroth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Recruitment Rate ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care

Background Management of delirium in intensive care units is challenging because effective therapies are lacking. Music is a promising nonpharmacological intervention. Objectives To determine the feasibility and acceptability of personalized music (PM), slow-tempo music (STM), and attention control (AC) in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit, and to estimate the effect of music on delirium. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed in an academic medical-surgical intensive care unit. After particular inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, patients were randomized to groups listening to PM, relaxing STM, or an audiobook (AC group). Sessions lasted 1 hour and were given twice daily for up to 7 days. Patients wore noise-canceling headphones and used mp3 players to listen to their music/audiobook. Delirium and delirium severity were assessed twice daily by using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the CAM-ICU-7, respectively. Results Of the 1589 patients screened, 117 (7.4%) were eligible. Of those, 52 (44.4%) were randomized, with a recruitment rate of 5 patients per month. Adherence was higher in the groups listening to music (80% in the PM and STM groups vs 30% in the AC group; P = .01), and 80% of patients surveyed rated the music as enjoyable. The median number (interquartile range) of delirium/coma-free days by day 7 was 2 (1-6) for PM, 3 (1-6) for STM, and 2 (0-3) for AC (P = .32). Median delirium severity was 5.5 (1-7) for PM, 3.5 (0-7) for STM, and 4 (1-6.5) for AC (P = .78). Conclusions Music delivery is acceptable to patients and is feasible in intensive care units. Further research testing use of this promising intervention to reduce delirium is warranted.

scholarly journals Ramelteon for Decreasing Delirium in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955732095122
Author(s):  
Chelsea N Lopez ◽  
Amaris Fuentes ◽  
Atiya Dhala ◽  
Jonathan Balk
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Confusion Assessment Method ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Surgical Icu

In intensive care unit (ICU) patients, delirium contributes to prolonged hospitalization, long-term cognitive impairment and increased mortality. Sleep disturbance, a risk factor for delirium, has been attributed to impaired melatonin secretion in critically ill patients. Ramelteon, a synthetic melatonin receptor agonist, is indicated for insomnia; there is limited, but growing evidence, to support its use for the prevention of delirium. The primary objective of this study is to describe the use of ramelteon and the incidence of delirium, assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores, in adult surgical ICU patients from May 22, 2016 to June 30, 2018. The primary endpoint is the number of delirium free days in the week prior to and post first ramelteon administration. A total of 231 patients were included in the study with 201 (87%) positive for delirium at least once during the study timeframe. The median number of CAM-ICU negative days in the week pre-ramelteon administration was 4 days (IQR 2-7 days) compared to 6 days (IQR 3-7 days) in the week post-first ramelteon administration ( P < .05). The time to CAM-ICU positive increased slightly to 3 days (IQR 1-7 days) following ramelteon initiation compared to 2 days (IQR 1-5 days) from initial ICU admission. Additionally, the median number of antipsychotic doses per patient decreased from 4 doses (IQR 1.25-14 doses) prior to ramelteon to 2 doses (IQR 1-4 doses) after ramelteon. Ramelteon administration was associated with a greater number of CAM-ICU negative days in surgical ICU patients. These findings describe a potential role for ramelteon in mitigating delirium in this patient population.

Survey of Physiotherapy Practice in Ontario Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Units

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200069
Author(s):  
Anastasia N.L. Newman ◽  
Michelle E. Kho ◽  
Jocelyn E. Harris ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud ◽  
Patricia Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Physiotherapy Practice

Purpose: This article describes current physiotherapy practice for critically ill adult patients requiring prolonged stays in critical care (> 3 d) after complicated cardiac surgery in Ontario. Method: We distributed an electronic, self-administered 52-item survey to 35 critical care physiotherapists who treat adult cardiac surgery patients at 11 cardiac surgical sites. Pilot testing and clinical sensibility testing were conducted beforehand. Participants were sent four email reminders. Results: The response rate was 80% (28/35). The median (inter-quartile range) reported number of cardiac surgeries performed per week was 30 (10), with a median number of 14.5 (4) cardiac surgery beds per site. Typical reported caseloads ranged from 6 to 10 patients per day pe therapist, and 93% reported that they had initiated physiotherapy with patients once they were clinically stable in the intensive care unit. Of 28 treatments, range of motion exercises (27; 96.4%), airway clearance techniques (26; 92.9%), and sitting at the edge of the bed (25; 89.3%) were the most common. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to limit physiotherapy practice. Use of outcome measures was limited. Conclusions: Physiotherapists provide a variety of interventions with critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Further evaluation of the limited use of outcome measures in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit is warranted.

Using a Decision Wheel to Reduce Use of Restraints in a Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Hevener ◽  
Barbara Rickabaugh ◽  
Toby Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Educational Activity ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Unplanned Extubations

Background Little information is available on the use of tools in intensive care units to help nurses determine when to restrain a patient. Patients in medical-surgical intensive care units are often restrained for their safety to prevent them from removing therapeutic devices. Research indicates that restraints do not necessarily prevent injuries or removal of devices by patients. Objectives To decrease use of restraints in a medical-surgical intensive care unit and to determine if a decision support tool is useful in helping bedside nurses determine whether or not to restrain a patient. Methods A quasi-experimental study design was used for this pilot study. Data were collected for each patient each shift indicating if therapeutic devices were removed and if restraints were used. An online educational activity supplemented by 1-on-1 discussion about proper use of restraints, alternatives, and use of a restraint decision tool was provided. Frequency of restraint use was determined. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to examine nurses’ perceptions of the decision support tool. Results Use of restraints was reduced 32%. No unplanned extubations or disruption of life-threatening therapeutic devices by unrestrained patients occurred. Conclusions With implementation of the decision support tool, nurses decreased their use of restraints yet maintained patients’ safety. A decision support tool may help nurses who are undecided or who need reassurance on their decision to restrain or not restrain a patient.

Elderly patients' reports of physical restraint experiences in intensive care units

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Minnick ◽  
RM Leipzig ◽  
ME Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Physical Restraint ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Physical Restraints ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Well Elderly

BACKGROUND: Use of physical restraints has undesirable sequelae. As they weigh the risks and benefits of protocols for reducing the use of restraints, staff members in intensive care units, where restraints are most used in hospitals, need to know how well elderly patients remember being restrained and how patients perceive the use of restraints. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of patients who remember being restrained, describe the experience from the patients' perspectives, and describe any distress caused by use of restraints within the overall experience of being in the intensive care unit. METHODS: Transcripts of semistructured, audiotaped interviews of patients who had been in the medical or surgical intensive care unit in any of 3 eastern and midwestern medical centers were analyzed by question and for overall themes. RESULTS: Six patients (40%) remembered some aspect of being restrained but did not report great distress. Patients accepted restraints as needed because of the lack of alternatives. Patients reported remembering that they should not perform certain behaviors but being unable to stop themselves. Patients cited hallucinations and intubation as major stressors in the intensive care unit. Patients' continuing health problems after discharge from the intensive care unit severely limited recruitment of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Patients do not remember great distress specifically related to the use of restraints, but the overall situation leading to use of restraints is disturbing if remembered. The discovery of methods to reduce the distress of intubation and hallucinations could decrease use of restraints.

Feasibility of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Surgical Intensive Care Unit Personnel

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Steinberg ◽  
Maryanna Klatt ◽  
Anne-Marie Duchemin
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Work Engagement ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

Background Surgical intensive care unit personnel are exposed to catastrophic situations as they care for seriously injured or ill patients. Few interventions have been developed to reduce the negative effects of work stress in this environment. Objective This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a workplace intervention for increasing resilience to stress. The intervention was implemented within the unique constraints characteristic of surgical intensive care units. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. The mindfulness-based intervention included meditation, mild yoga movement, and music and was conducted in a group format 1 hour a week for 8 weeks in a surgical intensive care unit during work hours. Assessments were performed 1 week before and 1 week after the intervention. Results The intervention was well received, with a 97% overall retention rate and 100% retention in the intervention group. Work satisfaction, measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, increased significantly in the intervention group with no change in the control group. Negative correlations were found between the vigor subscale scores of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and scores for emotional exhaustion on the Maslach Burnout Inventory and scores for burnout on the Professional Quality of Life scale. Participants rated recognizing their stress response as a main benefit of the intervention. Conclusion Workplace group interventions aimed at decreasing the negative effects of stress can be applied within hospital intensive care units. Despite many constraints, attendance at weekly sessions was high. Institutional support was critical for implementation of this program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document