Relationship between Neural Canal Impingement and Neurologic Status after Thoracolumber Burst Fractures

1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1504
Author(s):  
Hyoun Oh Cho ◽  
Kyung Duk Kwak ◽  
Sung Do Cho ◽  
Jung Hwan Suh
Spine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (19) ◽  
pp. 1563-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru Yugué ◽  
Kiyoshi Aono ◽  
Keiichiro Shiba ◽  
Takayoshi Ueta ◽  
Takeshi Maeda ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahat Edison Sitorus

Upper burst fracture of Th12-L1 has unique anatomy because it contains lower spinal cord, medullary cone, and diaphragm which separates between the thoracic and lumbar spine.The presence or absence of neurologic deficit is the single most important factor in the decision making. The presence of profound but incomplete neural deficit in association with canal compromise represents an urgent indication of surgical decompression. Antero-lateral direct decompression with trans-thoracic trans-pleural–retroperitoneal approach given the proximity the cord and conus is the most effective method, with inter-vertebral instrumentation with or without lateral fixation or posterior instrumentation.


TRAUMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
V.A. Radchenko ◽  
K.A. Popsuyshapka ◽  
M.Yu. Karpinsky ◽  
E.D. Karpinska ◽  
S.A. Teslenko

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Du ◽  
Yanzheng Gao ◽  
Changqing Zhao ◽  
Tangjun Zhou ◽  
Haijun Tian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Segmental cervical instability is a risk factor for the progression of osteophytic bone spurs and development of myelopathy, and is treated as a relative contraindication of cervical laminoplasty. The aim of this study was to compare laminoplasty with selective fixation (LPSF) versus laminectomy with fusion (LCF) in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy accompanied by segmental instability. Methods A case-control study was conducted by reviewing data from 63 patients who underwent LPSF (n = 30) or LCF (n = 33). Cervical alignment, range of motion (ROM), neurologic status and axial symptom severity pre-operation, 3-days after operation, and at the final follow-up (minimum 24 months) were measured and compared between groups. Results Postoperation, patients in the LPSF group lost 31.1 ± 17.3 % of cervical lordosis and 43.2 ± 10.9 % cervical ROM while patients in the LCF group lost 5.7 ± 8.2 % and 67.9 ± 15.5 %, respectively. Both LPSF and LCF groups significantly improved neurologic status and axial symptom severity at the final follow-up with similar between-group results(P > 0.05). Blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, and medical cost in the LPSF group were significantly less than in the LCF group(P < 0.05). Conclusions In 2 years of clinical observation, LPSF was effective in maintaining the stability of the cervical spine with less sacrifice of mobility and surgical trauma for multilevel myelopathy with segmental instability compared to LCF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 569.e9-569.e11
Author(s):  
Samuel Ferguson ◽  
Tolga Türker

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098412
Author(s):  
Abhinandan Reddy Mallepally ◽  
Nandan Marathe ◽  
Abhinav Kumar Shrivastava ◽  
Vikas Tandon ◽  
Harvinder Singh Chhabra

Study Design: Retrospective observational. Objectives: This study aimed to document the safety and efficacy of lumbar corpectomy with reconstruction of anterior column through posterior-only approach in complete burst fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed complete lumbar burst fractures treated with corpectomy through posterior only approach between 2014 and 2018. Clinical and intraoperative data including pre and post-operative neurology as per the ISNCSCI grade, VAS score, operative time, blood loss and radiological parameters, including pre and post-surgery kyphosis, height loss and canal compromise was assessed. Results: A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 38.89 and a TLICS score 5 or more were analyzed. Preoperative VAS was 7-10. Mean operating time was 219.56 ± 30.15 minutes. Mean blood loss was 1280 ± 224.21 ml. 23 patients underwent short segment fixation and 22 underwent long segment fixation. There was no deterioration in post-operative neurological status in any patient. At follow-up, the VAS score was in the range of 1-3. The difference in preoperative kyphosis and immediate post-operative deformity correction, preoperative loss of height in vertebra and immediate post-operative correction in height were significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The posterior-only approach is safe, efficient, and provides rigid posterior stabilization, 360° neural decompression, and anterior reconstruction without the need for the anterior approach and its possible approach-related morbidity. We achieved good results with an all posterior approach in 45 patients of lumbar burst fracture (LBF) which is the largest series of this nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document