scholarly journals Editorial Comments/ Redaksionele Kommentaar

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiaan B Brink
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Current Issue ◽  
Health Care Management ◽  
Health Care Economics ◽  
Wide Audience

The current issue of Health SA Gesondheid will interest a wide audience of scientists and health professionals working in the areas of health care management, health care economics, policy making, nursing, psychology, sociology, ethics and education. Opsomming Hierdie uitgawe van Health SA Gesondheid sal ‘n wye gehoor van wetenskaplikes en professionele gesondheidswerkers, wat werksaam is in die velde van gesondheidsorgbestuur, gesondheidsorgekonomie, beleidmaking, verpleegkunde, sielkunde, sosiologie en opvoedkunde, interesseer. *Please note: This is a reduced version of the abstract. Please refer to PDF for full text.

Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lavis ◽  
Huw Davies ◽  
Andy Oxman ◽  
Jean-Louis Denis ◽  
Karen Golden-Biddle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Health Care Management ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Care Managers

Objectives To identify ways to improve the usefulness of systematic reviews for health care managers and policy-makers that could then be evaluated prospectively. Methods We systematically reviewed studies of decision-making by health care managers and policy-makers, conducted interviews with a purposive sample of them in Canada and the United Kingdom (n=29), and reviewed the websites of research funders, producers/purveyors of research, and journals that include them among their target audiences (n=45). Results Our systematic review identified that factors such as interactions between researchers and health care policy-makers and timing/timeliness appear to increase the prospects for research use among policy-makers. Our interviews with health care managers and policy-makers suggest that they would benefit from having information that is relevant for decisions highlighted for them (e.g. contextual factors that affect a review's local applicability and information about the benefits, harms/risks and costs of interventions) and having reviews presented in a way that allows for rapid scanning for relevance and then graded entry (such as one page of take-home messages, a three-page executive summary and a 25-page report). Managers and policy-makers have mixed views about the helpfulness of recommendations. Our analysis of websites found that contextual factors were rarely highlighted, recommendations were often provided and graded entry formats were rarely used. Conclusions Researchers could help to ensure that the future flow of systematic reviews will better inform health care management and policy-making by involving health care managers and policy-makers in their production and better highlighting information that is relevant for decisions. Research funders could help to ensure that the global stock of systematic reviews will better inform health care management and policy-making by supporting and evaluating local adaptation processes such as developing and making available online more user-friendly ‘front ends’ for potentially relevant systematic reviews.

Issues of modernization of health care management in the regions

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
M.A. Laktaeva ◽  
◽  
E.A. Laktaeva ◽  
V.G. Ivanov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Health Care Management

An Empirical Study on Post-Adoption Behavior of Information Technologies for Health Care Management: A View of Big Five Personality

2014 ◽  
Vol 631-632 ◽  
pp. 1106-1114
Author(s):  
Wen Xing Lu ◽  
Yu Yong Wu ◽  
Chang Yong Liang ◽  
Zuo Zuo Gu ◽  
Yu Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Health Care Management ◽  
Hospital Performance ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Big Five Personality

Nowadays, health care management is driven by informationization and information technologies are widely used in various types of hospitals. Doctors and nurses are the direct users of information technologies for health care management (ITHCM), as well as the most critical prerequisites in ITHCM implementation. Their acceptance and use of ITHCM can significantly promote hospital performance and enhance core competitiveness. However, different people have different attitude, values and motivation on ITHCM. These factors not only affect employee’s behavior in ITHCM adoption, but also their continued use behavior of ITHCM. Based on the Big Five personality as well as real-world healthcare situation in China, we investigated the impacting factors of ITHCM continuing use, and built ITHCM Continuing Use Model based on personality. We conducted an empirical study to verify the related hypothesis. The results show that Big Five personality affect the willingness of ITHCM continuing use through perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document