scholarly journals Clinical practice guidelines for insomnia disorder

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
Lucille Malan ◽  
Nokuthula Dlamini

Insomnia disorder is defined as difficulty in falling asleep, maintaining sleep, and early morning awakenings. Common daytime consequences experienced are fatigue, mood instability and impaired concentration. In chronic insomnia these symptoms persist over a period of at least three months. Chronic insomnia can also be a symptom of a variety of disorders. The pathophysiology of insomnia is theorised as a disorder of nocturnal and daytime hyper-arousal as a result of increased somatic, cortical and cognitive activation. The causes of insomnia can be categorized into situational, medical, psychiatric and pharmacologically-induced. To diagnose insomnia, it is required to evaluate the daytime and nocturnal symptoms, as well as psychiatric and medical history. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5 Criteria (DSM-5) also provides guidelines and criteria to be followed when diagnosing insomnia disorder. Goals of treatment for insomnia disorder are to correct the underlying sleep complaint and this, together with insomnia symptoms, their severity and duration, as well as co-morbid disorders will determine the choice of treatment. In the majority of patients, insomnia can be treated without pharmacological therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy is considered first-line therapy for all patients with insomnia. The most common pharmacological insomnia treatments include benzodiazepines and benzodiazepines receptor agonists. To avoid tolerance and dependence, these hypnotics are recommended to be used at the lowest possible dose, intermittently and for the shortest duration possible. A combination of cognitive behavioural therapy and pharmacological treatment options is recommended for chronic insomnia.

2008 ◽  
Vol 193 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kaltenthaler ◽  
Glenys Parry ◽  
Catherine Beverley ◽  
Michael Ferriter

BackgroundComputerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (CCBT) is used for treating depression and provides a potentially useful alternative to therapist cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT).AimsTo systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of CCBT for the treatment of mild to moderate depression.MethodElectronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials. Selected studies were quality assessed and data extracted by two reviewers.ResultsFour studies of three computer software packages met the inclusion criteria. Comparators were treatment as usual, using a depression education website and an attention placebo.ConclusionsThere is some evidence to support the effectiveness of CCBT for the treatment of depression. However, all studies were associated with considerable drop-out rates and little evidence was presented regarding participants' preferences and the acceptability of the therapy. More research is needed to determine the place of CCBT in the potential range of treatment options offered to individuals with depression.


2013 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa Okajima ◽  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Shingo Nishida ◽  
Akira Usui ◽  
Ken-ichi Hayashida ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Norah Vincent ◽  
Maxine Holmqvist

Chapter 17 describes LI interventions in the treatment of chronic sleep problems and insomnia, and explores computerized cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) and challenges, using case studies throughout.


L Encéphale ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hartley ◽  
S. Dagneaux ◽  
V. Londe ◽  
M.-T. Liane ◽  
F. Aussert ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Strauss ◽  
Amy Arbon ◽  
Michael Barkham ◽  
Sarah Byford ◽  
Rebecca Crane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Depression has serious personal, family and economic consequences. It is estimated that it will cost £12.15 billion to the economy each year in England by 2026. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is the National Health Service talking therapies service in England for adults experiencing anxiety or depression. Over 1 million people are referred to IAPT every year, over half experiencing depression. Where symptoms of depression are mild/moderate, people are typically offered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) self-help supported by a psychological wellbeing practitioner (PWP). The problem is that over half of people who complete treatment for depression in IAPT remain depressed despite receiving National Institute of Health and Care Excellent (NICE) recommended treatment. Furthermore, less than half of IAPT service users complete treatment. This study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of an alternative to CBT self-help. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy differs from CBT in focus, approach and practice and may be more effective with a higher number of treatment completions. Methods/Design: This is a definitive randomised controlled trial comparing supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy self-help (MBCT-SH) with supported cognitive behavioural therapy self-help (CBT-SH) for adults experiencing mild/moderate depression being treated in IAPT services. Four hundred and ten participants experiencing mild/moderate depression will be recruited from IAPT services and randomised to receive either an MBCT-based self-help workbook or a CBT-based self-help workbook. Participants will be asked to complete their workbook within 16 weeks, with six support sessions with a PWP. The primary outcome is depression symptom severity upon treatment completion. Secondary outcomes are treatment completion rates and measures of generalized anxiety, wellbeing, functioning and mindfulness. An exploratory non-inferiority analysis will be conducted in the event the primary hypothesis is not supported. A semi-structured interview with participants will guide understanding of change processes.Discussion: If the findings from this randomised controlled trial demonstrate that MBCT-SH is more effective than CBT-SH for adults experiencing depression, this will provide evidence for policy makers and lead to changes to clinical practice in IAPT services, leading to greater choice of self-help treatment options and better outcomes for service users. If the exploratory non-inferiority analysis is conducted and this indicates non-inferiority of MBCT-SH in comparison to CBT-SH this will also be of interest to policy makers when seeking to increase service user choice of self-help treatment options for depression. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trial registration number ISRCTN 13495752. Registered on 31 August 2017 (www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13495752).Protocol Version: Version 1 (18 January 2020)Date first participant randomised: 24 November 2017Trial Sponsor: Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust ([email protected])


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document