Comparative evaluation of etch pattern, the length of resin tags, and shear bond strength of all-in-one adhesive system on intact enamel with and without phosphoric acid pre-etching: An in vitro investigation

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Savitha Adiga ◽  
Ida Ataide ◽  
Marina Fernades
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
Eduardo Galera da Silva ◽  
Maria Filomena Rocha Lima Huhtala ◽  
Ana Paula Martins Gomes ◽  
Clovis Pagani ◽  
Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Aim This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength of a chemical resin cement to five adhesive systems in bovine dentin. Materials and methods One hundred and three bovine teeth were divided into five experimental groups (n = 19) and two control groups (n = 4). A flat dentin surface was exposed on each tooth after wet grinding the buccal enamel, in order to apply the adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Multi Bond Uno plus Duo, One Step, Prompt L-Pop) to 95 teeth, according to manufacture's instructions. Four teeth were etched with phosphoric acid (negative control) and four teeth were no etched with phosphoric acid (positive control). Light-cured composite blocks were sandblasted before the cementation with C&B Cement (Bisco) over the treated dentin. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C and submitted to the shear bond strength test after 7 days. Results ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 0.05) demonstrated that Adper Single Bond (7.47 ± 4.37), Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (6.68 ± 5.11) and One Step (7.30 ± 4.29) presented the highest bond strength values. Prompt L-Pop (0.05 ± 0.17) and Multi Bond Uno plus Duo (0.72 ± 1.41) presented the lowest significant bond strength values. Conclusion The shear bond strength of composite resin cylinders cemented with chemically activated resin cement depends on the adhesive system used. Clinical significance Fourth and fifth generation light polymerized bonding systems are indicated when self-polymerizing cements are used. How to cite this article Kubo CH, Caneppele TMF, da Silva EG, Huhtala MFRL, Torres CRG, Pagani C, Gomes APM. Shear Bond Strength of a Chemical Resin Cement to Five Adhesive Systems in Bovine Dentin. World J Dent 2012;3(2):150-155.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Hideo Shimizu ◽  
Karlos Giovani Grando ◽  
Isabela Almeida Shimizu ◽  
Augusto Ricardo Andriguetto ◽  
Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic metal brackets bonded by direct and indirect techniques. METHODS: Thirty healthy human maxillary premolar teeth were used. The teeth were divided into three groups of 10 teeth each: Group I - indirect bonding with SondhiTM Rapid-Set system (3M/Unitek), Group II - indirect bonding with TransbondTM XT adhesive system (3M/Unitek) and Group III - direct bonding with TransbondTM XT adhesive system (3M/Unitek). After bonding and obtaining the specimens for the study, the specimens were subjected to SBS testing in a universal testing machine (Emic, model DL-500). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to ascertain that the data had a normal distribution and the Bartlett test to check whether there was homogeneity of variance. One-factor analysis of variance was performed and, subsequently, Tukey's test for paired means. A 5% significance level was adopted. RESULTS: The results of Group I were 67.6 (N) and 5.9 (MPa); Group II, 68.9 (N) and 6.1 (MPa) and Group III (control), 92.5 (N) and 8.1 (MPa). CONCLUSION: It can therefore be concluded that the means for Group III were significantly higher compared with Groups I and II in both Newton (N) and Megapascal (MPa) values. The means attained by the indirect bonding technique used in Groups I and II, however, exhibited no statistically significant differences.


2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35
Author(s):  
Shinya Horiuchi ◽  
Shingo Kuroda ◽  
Masahiro Hiasa ◽  
Toshiyuki Suge ◽  
Seitaro Saku ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine the reinforcement of bond strength of a self-etching system by applying a pretreatment agent. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were used in this study. The enamel surfaces were treated with four pretreatment agents—phosphoric acid, polyacrylic acid, citric acid, and ammonium hexafluorosilicate (SiF)—and were examined under a scanning electron microscope. Afterward, orthodontic brackets were bonded with a self-etching adhesive system (n  =  10 for each agent), and shear bond strength was measured through a debonding process. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also assessed. Results: Enamel surfaces treated with polyacrylic acid seemed almost the same as intact enamel. Treatment with SiF induced slight shallow depressions compared with the intact enamel. On the other hand, enamel surfaces treated with citric acid and phosphoric acid showed severe etching patterns. All pretreatments increased the bond strength, but SiF-treated specimens revealed the greatest strength (12.201 ± 1.048 MPa), followed by polyacrylic acid (12.030 ± 2.103 MPa). The control group with no pretreatment showed the least strength (9.078 ± 1.678 MPa). All pretreatments increased ARI score compared with the control group. Conclusions: Surface conditioning before bracket adhesion could reinforce the bond strength of the self-etching adhesive system, resulting in a more reliable bonding system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sabra Jaâfoura ◽  
Amira Kikly ◽  
Saida Sahtout ◽  
Mounir Trabelsi ◽  
Dorra Kammoun

Introduction. This in vitro study compared the shear strength of three composite resin systems to fluorosed and normal dentin. Methods. Silorane FiltekTM P90, FiltekTMZ250 XT in combination with the adhesive system AdperTM Single bond 2, and Amelogen® Plus in association with Peak Universal Bond® were tested. Fifteen normal and 15 fluorosed dentine disks were prepared per material. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal machine. Results. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in bond strength between the tested composite resins. All tested materials had significantly different adhesion at the fluorosed and the nonfluorosed interface. FiltekTM Z250 XT and Silorane had lower adhesion values to fluorosed than to normal dentin. In contrast, Amelogen® Plus presented a better average resistance at the fluorosed interface. Conclusion. Amelogen® Plus presented a better average shear bond strength on the fluorosed dentine. FiltekTMZ250 XT showed the best adhesion forces and shear bond strength with sound dentine. Further studies are needed to better understand the sealing of these systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document