scholarly journals Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 436-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahya Orcun Zorba ◽  
Nurcan Ozakar Ilday ◽  
Yusuf Ziya Bayındır ◽  
Sezer Demirbuga
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Direct Restoration ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Indirect Composite ◽  
Composite Inlays ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample t-tests and Tukey′s tests. Results: Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength (P < 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.

Enamel Bond Strength of New Universal Adhesive Bonding Agents

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
DE McLean ◽  
EJ Meyers ◽  
VL Guillory ◽  
KS Vandewalle
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Bonding ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Purpose Universal bonding agents have been introduced for use as self-etch or etch-and-rinse adhesives depending on the dental substrate and clinician's preference. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite to enamel using universal adhesives compared to a self-etch adhesive when applied in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes over time. Methods and Materials Extracted human third molars were used to create 120 enamel specimens. The specimens were ground flat and randomly divided into three groups: two universal adhesives and one self-etch adhesive. Each group was then subdivided, with half the specimens bonded in self-etch mode and half in etch-and-rinse mode. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions, and composite was bonded using a standardized mold and cured incrementally. The groups were further divided into two subgroups with 10 specimens each. One subgroup was stored for 24 hours and the second for six months in 37°C distilled water and tested in shear. Failure mode was also determined for each specimen. Results A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found a significant difference between groups based on bonding agent (p&lt;0.001) and surface treatment (p&lt;0.001) but not on time (p=0.943), with no significant interaction (p&gt;0.05). Clearfil SE in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes had more mixed fractures than either universal adhesive in either mode. Conclusions Etching enamel significantly increased the SBS of composite to enamel. Clearfil SE had significantly greater bond strength to enamel than either universal adhesive, which were not significantly different from each other.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THREE SELF-ETCH DENTIN BONDING AGENTS TO DENTIN: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 454-459
Author(s):  
Bhalla V. ◽  
◽  
K. Goud M. ◽  
Chockattu S. ◽  
Khera A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Self Etch

Background:Dentin bonding is an ever-evolving field in adhesive dentistry. With the introduction of newer systems into the market, there is a crucial need to test their efficiency in terms of bond strength. Dual-cured adhesives in theory may provide for a better degree of conversion as compared to conventional light-cured adhesives .Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different self-etch adhesives namely ClearfilSE bond (Kuraray), Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) and Futura Bond DC (Voco) to dentin. Materials & Methods: Ninety extracted non-carious, intact human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Each tooth was decoronated using a double-sided diamond disc with water coolant to a depth of 2mm from the cusp tip .The cut dentin surface was then abraded against 600-grit wet silicon carbide papers for 60 seconds to produce a uniform smear layer. The root portion of each tooth was mounted on a plastic ring using cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were then divided into three adhesive groups of 30 teeth each, Group A: ClearfilSE Bond (Kuraray), Group B: Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent), Group C :Futura Bond DC (Voco). All bonding agents were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, in combination with the resin composite Tetric N Ceram (IvoclarVivadent). The samples were thermocycled, followed by shear bond strength testing using a Universal testing machine (Hounsfield). Data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<0.05) and Post hoc Tukey’s test for inter- and intra- group analysis respectively. Results: Clearfil SE Bond yielded the highest shear bond strength values (30.9 ±4.66 MPa) which were statistically significant, followed byTetric N Bond Universal group (29.8 ±4.34) and the lowest shear bond strength values were recorded for Futura Bond DC (18.2 ±3.13). Conclusion: Clearfil SE bond and Tetric N bond Universal can be considered as better options than Futura Bond DC.

Bond Strength Comparison of Orthodontic Bonding Systems: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Tubayesha Hassan ◽  
MH Sattar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Scientific Review ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Self Etch

As a means of regular practice in orthodontics and aesthetic dentistry, resin based adhesive systems are being used exclusively. Keeping up with the ever-increasing demand for aesthetic dental treatment all over the world, newer and more improved adhesive systems have been developed. However, regarding the comparison as to which bonding system performs better in clinical perspective, there is lack of existing scientific review articles. In this review, we tend to explore the conventional etch and rinse bonding system and the self-etch primer bonding system. The different tests to assess and compare bond strength between these two types of adhesives from various bibliography are discussed. The results of shear bond strength test, adhesive remnant index (ARI), enamel-adhesive interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the effect of saliva contamination and time are discussed. Interestingly, each system has its strengths and weaknesses. In shear bond strength, self-etch bonding systems clearly exhibits less strength than conventional bonding systems. Resin tags into enamel surface are shorter in self-etch primer adhesives which results from milder etching to enamel compared to the conventional aid-etch and rinse adhesives. Contrarily, the irreversible changes to enamel surface is more aggressive in conventional acid-etching which states that self-etching systems are better according to the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2017; Vol-7 (1-2), P.20-26

scholarly journals Immediate Dentin Bond Strength of Self-etch Dentine Adhesives

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
David Lafuente ◽  
Isabel Ferreto
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
The Other ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Sixth Generation ◽  
Self Etch

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate bond strength of two sixth generation and two seventh generation dentin bonding agents to superficial dentin. Specimens were prepared to exposed superficial dentin and either Clearfil SE, Clearfil S3, Adper Prompt-l-pop of G-bond was applied over the dentin surface and light cured. Then composite resin was applied to the treated surface and light-cured in two increments. Specimens were tested 15 minutes after they were made for shear bond strength at 0.01 cm/min. Clearfil SE had statistically higher bond strength than the other three adhesives evaluated (42.9 MPa). There was no statistical difference among Clearfil S3, Adper Prompt-l-pop and G-Bond. The dentin adhesive with an application of an acidic primer before the application of the adhesive showed better immediate bond strength.

scholarly journals The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Bahari ◽  
Siavash Savadi Oskoee ◽  
Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom ◽  
Nasim Molayi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Aluminium Chloride ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Composite Samples

Background. Contamination of dentin surface is one of the common problems in restorative dentistry. The aim was to investigate the effects of different surface contaminators on the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive system (UAS) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies. Methods. One hundred forty-four maxillary anterior sound human teeth were divided into six groups based on the types of surface contaminators: no surface contaminator (control) and experimental groups contaminated with blood, saliva, aluminium chloride (ALC), ferric sulphate (FS), and caries disclosing agent (CDA). Then, each group was further subdivided into two, based on the application strategy of UAS (ER and SE). After applying the adhesive according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and bonding cylindrical composite samples, the SBS was measured. The data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and t test (P<0.05). Results. The SBS in all contaminated groups, except for CDA, was significantly lower in both ER and SE strategies compared to control group (P<0.05). A comparison between the application strategies revealed that ER and SE were only significantly different in the FS contaminated group (P<0.05). Conclusion. All tested contaminators, except CDA, significantly decreased SBS of UAS in both ER and SE strategies.

scholarly journals The Use of Mouse Models to Investigate Shear Bond Strength in Amelogenesis Imperfecta

2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (11) ◽  
pp. 1352-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Pugach ◽  
F. Ozer ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
K. Sheth ◽  
R. Beasley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Mouse Models ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Amelogenesis Imperfecta ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Knock Out ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Variable Success ◽  
Self Etch

Patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) have defective enamel; therefore, bonded restorations of patients with AI have variable success rates. To distinguish which cases of AI may have good clinical outcomes with bonded materials, we evaluated etching characteristics and bond strength of enamel in mouse models, comparing wild-type (WT) with those having mutations in amelogenin (Amelx) and matrix metalloproteinase-20 (Mmp20), which mimic 2 forms of human AI. Etched enamel surfaces were compared for roughness by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Bonding was compared through shear bond strength (SBS) studies with 2 different systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch). Etched enamel surfaces of incisors from Amelx knock-out ( AmelxKO) mice appeared randomly organized and non-uniform compared with WT. Etching of Mmp20KO surfaces left little enamel, and the etching pattern was indistinguishable from unetched surfaces. SBS results were significantly different when AmelxKO and Mmp20KO enamel surfaces were compared. A significant increase in SBS was measured for all samples when the self-etch system was compared with the etch-and-rinse system. We have developed a novel system for testing shear bond strength of mouse incisors with AI variants, and analysis of these data may have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with AI.

Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restorations Under Cycling Conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. E71-E80 ◽  
Author(s):  
RF Zanatta ◽  
M Lungova ◽  
AB Borges ◽  
CRG Torres ◽  
H-G Sydow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage and shear bond strength of composite restorations under different cycling conditions. Methods and Materials: Class V cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 human molars (n=60). A further 60 molars were used to prepare flat enamel and dentin specimens (n=60 each). Cavities and specimens were divided into six groups and pretreated with an adhesive (self-etch/Clearfil SE Bond or etch-and-rinse/Optibond FL). Composite was inserted in the cavities or adhered to the specimens' surfaces, respectively, and submitted to cycling (control: no cycling; thermal cycling: 10,000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C; thermal/erosive cycling: thermal cycling plus storage in hydrochloric acid pH 2.1, 5 minutes, 6×/day, 8 days). Microleakage was quantified by stereomicroscopy in enamel and dentin margins after immersion in silver nitrate. Specimens were submitted to shear bond strength testing. Statistical analysis was done by two-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p&lt;0.05). Results: Microleakage in enamel margins was significantly lower in the control group compared with thermal cycling or thermal/erosive cycling. Erosive conditions increased microleakage compared with thermal cycling (significant only for Clearfil SE Bond). No significant differences were observed in dentin margins. Bond strength of enamel specimens was reduced by thermal cycling and thermal/erosive cycling when Clearfil SE Bond was used and only by thermal/erosive cycling when Optibond FL was used. No differences were observed among dentin specimens. Conclusions: Thermal/erosive cycling can adversely affect microleakage and shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel.

Effect of Postoperative Peroxide Bleaching on the Stability of Composite to Enamel and Dentin Bonds

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Dudek ◽  
A Roubickova ◽  
L Comba ◽  
D Housova ◽  
P Bradna
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Bond ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Carbamide Peroxide ◽  
Peroxide Bleaching ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY This study investigated the effect of peroxide bleaching gel on the durability of the adhesive bond between composite material, enamel, and dentin created with the etch-and-rinse adhesive Gluma Comfort Bond (GLU) and with the self-etch adhesives Clearfil SE Bond (CLE), Adper Prompt (ADP), and iBond (IBO). The adhesives were applied to flattened enamel and dentin of extracted human molars and built up with a microhybrid composite (Charisma). After 25 eight-hour cycles of bleaching with a 20% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Opalescence PF 20), the shear bond strength was measured and compared with one-day and two-month control specimens stored in water. The data were analyzed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis statistics (p&lt;0.05). Detailed fractographic analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. The bleaching gel significantly decreased the bond strength on both enamel and dentin for the simplified single-step self-etch adhesives ADP and IBO and markedly affected a fracture pattern of ADP specimens at the periphery of their bonded area. The results of our study indicate that the durability of adhesive restorations can be detrimentally influenced by carbamide peroxide bleaching and that different adhesives show varying sensitivity levels to the bleaching gel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document