scholarly journals r-index: Quantifying the quality of an individual′s scientific research output

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. C. Rahul
Keyword(s):  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Research Output

Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators

2019 ◽  
pp. 39-55
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Scientific Research Output ◽  
Measurement And Evaluation ◽  
Rational Evaluation

An unbiased and reasonable research evaluation should reflect the diversity and impact of research productivity. The evaluation of scientific research is essential to determine its achievement, reputation, growth, and progress of an individual or an institution. In this context, production and quality of scholarly content offer a strong foundation for its rational evaluation. The citations along with the number of scientific publications are predominantly used to evaluate research content. The use of scientometric indicators is of great use in the measurement and evaluation of the scientific research output, but at the same instant, it requires a great carefulness in use.

scholarly journals U-INDEX: Unified Index for Measuring Quality of Scientific Research Output

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-77
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Digital Publishing ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Scientific Research Output ◽  
Standardized Index ◽  
Unified Index

With the beginning of the Internet and the diversity of its applications, And the increase in the digital publishing of open access sources, and the multiplicity of sites, which take the network measurements as an application axis. For this reason, many indicators have appeared, which are concerned with measuring the quality of the scientific scholar output. This study, tries to diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the approved indexes, and overcome them by designing a new index that combines all indexes characteristics and exceeds the negatives of, some of them as a Standardized index used to evaluate the scientific outcomes of scientists scholar output. After applying and comparing the Standardized index, we reached the value that was more accurate and objective than the benefits of other indexes and the possibility of overcoming some of the negatives accompanying the other indexes.

Mobility of Engineering and Technology Professionals and its Impact on the Quality of Engineering and Technology Education

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Fredreck Chinyemba
Keyword(s):  
Technology Education ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Engineering And Technology Education ◽  
University Of Technology ◽  
Scientific Research Output ◽  
Engineering And Technology ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Part Time ◽  
The Impact

This study explores the impact of mobility of qualified and experienced engineering and technology lecturers on the quality of engineering and technology education. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from students, lecturers, Heads of Departments and Academic Deans at Chinhoyi University of Technology, Zimbabwe. The findings from this study indicate that the absence of experienced and qualified professionals has a negative effect on the quality of engineering and technology education. The lecturer’s experience is considered a rich legitimate source of quality. Findings also reveal that the use of teaching assistants and part time lecturers as an alternative to experienced professionals, coupled with lack of resources, adversely impacted on the quality of graduates from the institution. Essentially, lectures conducted were characterized by poor instructional delivery, rushing through courses and over burdened lecturers. Scientific research output was significantly low and productive time was being wasted on human resource issues.

Analysis of the ch-index: an indicator to evaluate the diffusion of scientific research output by citers

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiorenzo Franceschini ◽  
Domenico Maisano ◽  
Anna Perotti ◽  
Andrea Proto
Keyword(s):  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Research Output

scholarly journals fCite: a fractional citation tool to quantify an individual’s scientific research output

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukasz Pawel Kozlowski
Keyword(s):  
Research Output ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
User Profiles ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scientific Research Output ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Multiple Metrics ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Number Of Authors

ABSTRACTHere, I present the fCite web service (fcite.org) a tool for the in-depth analysis of an individual’s scientific research output. While multiple existing tools (e.g., Google Scholar, iCite, Microsoft Academic) focus on the total number of citations and the H-index, I propose the analysis of the research output by considering multiple metrics to provide greater insight into a scientist’s multifaceted profile. The most distinguishing feature of fCite is its ability to calculate fractional scores for most of the metrics currently in use. Thanks to the division of citations (and RCR scores) by the number of authors, the tool provides a more detailed analysis of a scholar’s portfolio. fCite is based on PUBMED data (~18 million publications), and the statistics are calculated with respect to ORCID data (~600,000 user profiles).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document