scholarly journals A cross-sectional study on different time intervals from the appreciation of symptoms to final diagnosis in inoperable primary lung cancer: An Eastern Indian experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swapnendu Misra ◽  
Surajit Chatterjee ◽  
Ira Das ◽  
Ritam Chakraborty ◽  
Kaushik Saha ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Kashish Dutta ◽  
Varinder Saini ◽  
Nitin Gupta ◽  
Kranti Garg

2020 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Maryam Naseri ◽  
Mohammad Shahsavan ◽  
Faeze Salahshour ◽  
Soheil Peiman ◽  
Seyed Farshad Allameh ◽  
...  

Abstract The extent of radiation exposure in emergency settings is not well documented; here, the corresponding effective dose (ED) is provided. In 500 patients admitted in row to the emergency department, ED was compared in patients according to complaints and their visiting physicians. Out of all, 220 patients aged 43.5 ± 22.2 years (admission: 2.0 ± 1.6 days) had at least an imaging. The main reasons for admission were trauma (10.5%) and then orthopedic problems (8.6%). EDs from CT and radiography were 1.66 ± 3.59 and 0.71 ± 1.67 mSv, respectively (from all 2.29 ± 4.12). Patients with abdominal (5.8 ± 5.2 mSv; p < 0.002) and pelvic (12.0 ± 6.3 mSv; p < 0.007) complaints received higher ED from CT and radiography and, also, patients visited by surgeons (7.94 ± 6.9 mSv). CT scan was the main source for ED to patients. Irrespective of the final diagnosis, patients with abdominopelvic complaints and those visited by surgeons are at higher exposure risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela Maria Silva ◽  
Vânia Sammartino Mariano ◽  
Paula Roberta Aguiar Pastrez ◽  
Miguel Cordoba Pinto ◽  
Emily Montosa Nunes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loes T Wouters ◽  
Dorien L Zwart ◽  
Daphne C Erkelens ◽  
Noël S Cheung ◽  
Esther de Groot ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During telephone triage, it is difficult to assign adequate urgency to patients with chest discomfort. Considering the time of calling could be helpful. Objective To assess the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in certain time periods and whether sex influences this risk. Methods Cross-sectional study of 1655 recordings of telephone conversations of patients who called the out-of-hours services primary care (OHS-PC) for chest discomfort. Call time, patient characteristics, symptoms, medical history and urgency allocation of the triage conversations were collected. The final diagnosis of each call was retrieved at the patient’s general practice. Absolute numbers of patients with and without ACS were plotted and risks per hour were calculated. The risk ratio of ACS at night (0 to 9 am) was calculated by comparing to the risk at other hours and was adjusted for gender and age. Results The mean age of callers was 58.9 (standard deviation ±19.5) years, 55.5% were women and, in total, 199 (12.0%) had an ACS. The crude risk ratio for an ACS at night was 1.80 (confidence interval 1.39–2.34, P < 0.001): 2.33 (1.68–3.22, P < 0.001) for men and 1.29 (0.83–1.99, P = 0.256) for women. The adjusted risk ratio for ACS of all people at night was 1.82 (1.07–3.10, P = 0.039). Conclusions Patients calling the OHS-PC for chest discomfort between 0 and 9 am have almost twice a higher risk of ACS than those calling other hours, a phenomenon more evident in men than in women. At night, dispatching ambulances more ‘straightaway’ could be considered for these patients with chest discomfort. Trial number NTR7331.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document