scholarly journals A clinical comparative study of fascia iliaca compartment block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for positioning and duration of postoperative analgesia in fracture femur under spinal anesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Krishnamurthy ◽  
NikilaDevarayasamudram Gopal
Author(s):  
Mohamed G. Naeem ◽  
Naglaa K. Mohammed ◽  
Reda S. Abd Elrahman ◽  
Osama M. Shalaby

Background: Fracture femur is common in elderly. Spinal anesthesia (SA) in elderly patients can be associated with major hemodynamic changes whereas lumbar plexus block (LPB) can provide ideal perioperative analgesia as there is no hemodynamic instability or depression of pulmonary functions. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of SA versus LPB for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in fracture femur surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was carried out 70 patients of either sex with age >20 years, ASA physical status I - III scheduled for fracture femur surgery. Patients were randomly classified into two equal groups (n = 35); group I (SA) received SA by heavy bupivacaine HCL 0.5% 2.5-3.5 ml and group II (LBP) received posterior LPB by 30-35 ml bupivacaine 0.5%. Results: The time for performing the block was significantly longer in group LPB than group SA. The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly increased in group LPB than group SA. The intraoperative HR was significantly increased, and intraoperative MAP was significantly decreased in group SA compared to group LPB at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes. Postoperative HR and MAP was significantly increased in group SA compared to group LPB at 1 and 6 h. Postoperative VAS was significantly increased in group SA than group LPB at 1 and 6 h. The duration of sensory and motor block was significantly increased in group LPB than group SA. The time of postoperative first analgesic requirement was significantly longer and the total pethidine consumption in the 1st 24 h was significantly lower in group LPB than group SA. SA was associated with significant increase in hypotension, nausea, vomiting and headache. Conclusion: LPB is an effective alternative to SA as an anesthetic technique for femur fracture surgeries. LBP offers a more stable intraoperative hemodynamics and provides longer duration of analgesia postoperatively with less side effects. However, SA has shorter time for performing the block with earlier onset of sensory and motor block.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3477-3486
Author(s):  
Dr Syeda Sana ◽  
Dr Ramesh G. Pathak ◽  
Dr Nazima Memon

Introduction: Fracture of proximal femur is a common occurrence following road traffic accidents and falls (in relatively older age group). These fractures are associated with considerable pain before surgery and in postoperative period. Effective pain management during positioning and in postoperative period is crucial and fascia Iliaca compartment block can be used effectively for this purpose in these patients. Many adjuvants like epinephrine, clonidine, Opioids, ketamine, dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine were combined with local anaesthetics to prolong the post-operative analgesia.  We conducted this prospective study to know duration  of post-operative analgesia with Fascia iliaca compartment block (ficb)  using Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone in patients with proximal fracture femur. Materials and methods: This was a randomized, prospective, double blinded and controlled study done in the department of anesthesiology of a medical college situated in an urban area. 90 patients of either gender , ASA grade I & II ,the age of whom was between 18-80 years and who were undergoing surgery for proximal fracture femur under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this study . All these patients received FICB by landmark technique before spinal anesthesia. The patients were divided in 3 groups. Group I - Patient in this group received 0.25% Bupivacaine plus normal saline 0.9%. Group II Patient in this group received 0.25% Bupivacaine plus dexamethasone. Group III Patient in this group received 0.25% Bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. Level of analgesia during positioning and in post operative period along with other parameters like sedation scores, VAS scores, hemodynamics and complications in these 3 groups were compared. Results: The study comprised of 90 patients out of which 45 (50%) were males and 45 (50%) were females with a M: F ratio of 1:1. ASA Grades and Mean duration of surgeries in these groups were comparable. For preoperative Pulse Rate, SBP, SpO2 the test used was One-Way ANOVA. p > 0.05 for all three parameters. There was no significant difference in onset of FICB and time required for giving spinal anesthesia in three groups (p>0.05). 27(90%) patients in group I, 25(83%) patients in group II and 26(87%) patients in group III had no sensation to pinprick thirty minutes after FICB. Preoperative pulse rate and pulse rate thirty minutes after FICB were compared .There was significant reduction in pulse rate (p<0.05) in group III 30 minutes after FICB. The analysis of changes in mean pulse rates showed that there was no significant difference in mean pulse rate intraoperatively (p>0.05). the study of postoperative duration of analgesia showed that There was highly significant difference in post-operative duration of analgesia between group I&II ,group I&III and group II&III . Conclusion: Addition of dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine for fascia iliaca compartment block in patients with proximal femur fracture further prolongs post-operative analgesia compared to plain Bupivacaine. Addition of dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine provides better postoperative analgesia than Bupivacaine with dexamethasone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document