scholarly journals Preparedness for emergencies and complications: Proactive planning and multidisciplinary approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 366 ◽  
Author(s):  
SukhminderJit Singh Bajwa ◽  
Lalit Mehdiratta
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 02037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Israa Fadhil Alqaisi

Managing stakeholders’ expectations and interests is key to a project’s success. So, identifying stakeholders at the beginning of the projects, recognizing and managing their needs and expectations will contribute to the creation of a suitable environment and be catalyst for success. This can be achieved through the establishment of appropriate and timely communication that meets the requirements of stakeholders. This includes providing the decision makers with the required data and receiving feedback to ensure alignment among project objectives and stakeholders expectations. This paper mentions one of the projects which neglected the proactive planning and management of stakeholder’s requirements that causes waste in time and resources and many issues that appear as a result of poor planning, and the lessons learned from it.


Opflow ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Amrou Atassi ◽  
Jim Pingatore ◽  
John Hardwick ◽  
Eva Opitz

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. e52-e55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina B. Newport ◽  
Sonia Malhotra ◽  
Eric Widera
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
H.O. Adeyemi ◽  
O.O. Akinyemi ◽  
A.I. Musa ◽  
B.J. Olorunfemi

Abstract This study evaluated managements’ proactive planning approach (PPA) to enhance safety among workers in South-western Nigeria small scale industry (SSI). The main objective was to rate the managements’ efforts at eliminating risk among their employees. By worker participatory and psychological survey approach, three tools were used; workplace observation (visual), management safety culture (questionnaire) and managers interviews (oral). The survey included 200 workers, 120 supervisors and 80 managers, in 82 SSI. Four steps to a safety proactive action plans (PAP), (looking for clues, prioritization of identified potential hazard, making improvements to eliminate the risk and follow up), were rated by employees on a scale from 0 to 5. Paired t-test was used to appraise the significant difference between the managers’ mean scores rated by the supervisors and other workers. 77.1% of workers and 64.2% supervisors rated their managers as either “not done at all” or “poorly done”. Workers’ scores for managers PPA had statistically significantly lower ratings (mean = 1.09, SEM = 0.22) compared to that of the supervisors rating (mean = 1.55, SEM = 0.32), with t (14) = −1.185, p = 0.784. There is a closed poor performance perception gaps, of managers’ PPA, of the two groups of employees. It can be concluded that safety is not emphasized, by managers of SSI, as overriding priority and this may have contributed to high reported injuries among their workforce. Courses to enhance managements’ understanding for inclusion of safety among the leading priorities becomes necessary. This will reduce work-related risks and promotes occupational safety and health among the group of workers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-82
Author(s):  
Iván Győző Somlai

The author describes his personal experience as a young refugee from a revolution in Europe, through his later intimate contact with three refugee communities in the course of decades of work in Asia, and reflects upon the greater context of the numerous issues impacting on decision-making and enveloping the sphere of refugees. Especially in the current tide of millions displaced, it is not possible in times of crises to simply segue in an attempt to harmonize the exceedingly complex situation. All components of the inter-related issues and results, namely causes of flight, reception outside their home countries, plans for resettlement and actual resettlement, as well as retaining some level of communication with those left behind need to be understood through improved, proactive planning and preparation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eryk Szwarc ◽  
Jarosław Wikarek

AbstractAmong the many factors that cause project delays or cancellations are disruptions, that is, unforeseen events occurring during the implementation of a project, which postpone or interrupt the performance of project activities. Examples of disruptions include employee absenteeism, addition of new activities, and others. One way to deal with this type of events is to predict potential disruptions and prepare redundant resources to be used should a disruption occur (proactive approach). The focus of the present paper are human resources, in particular redundant project team competence frameworks, which allow to continue work on a project in the event of a disruption. Previous studies on planning competence frameworks regard insensitivity (robustness) to one type of disruption, caused by employee absenteeism (an absence of one, two, or three employees). The goal of this article is to present a proactive procedure that allows to seek competence frameworks robust to two types of disruptions: absence of one employee and addition of new activities not included in the project plan. Examples are provided to illustrate how the proposed approach can be used in practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document