scholarly journals Bone mineral density and mandibular osteoporotic alterations in panoramic radiographs: Correlation by peripheral bone densitometry in men

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
Luciana Munhoz ◽  
IsabelaGoulart Gil Choi ◽  
DanielKey Miura ◽  
PlautoChristopher Aranha Watanabe ◽  
EmikoSaito Arita
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 227.2-228
Author(s):  
D. Claire ◽  
M. Geoffroy ◽  
L. Kanagaratnam ◽  
C. Isabelle ◽  
A. Hittinger ◽  
...  

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Marwaha ◽  
N. Tandon ◽  
D. H. K. Reddy ◽  
K. Mani ◽  
S. Puri ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Di Franco ◽  
M. T. Mauceri ◽  
A. Sili-Scavalli ◽  
A. Iagnocco ◽  
A. Ciocci

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Paula Cristina De Faria ◽  
Maria Fernanda Lima Villaça-Carvalho ◽  
Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes ◽  
Mari Eli Leonelli De Moraes ◽  
Luiz Roberto Coutinho Manhães Júnior

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of panoramic radiographs (PR) and their radiomorphometric indices as an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. <strong>Material and</strong> <strong>Methods:</strong> Twenty five women were selected, who had been prescribed PR for different purposes. The PR were analysed according to the MCI, which evaluates the mandibular cortex below the mental foramen, and then divided into two groups: normal and bone mineral loss. Bone densitometry scans were obtained (DXA) from the lumbar spine and neck of the femur/whole femur, which were used as the gold standard for comparison against the MCI. Kappa test (p&lt;0.05) was used to determine the association between the MCI and bone densitometry readings. <strong>Results:</strong> Regarding the DXA, 7 patients were normal at the lumbar spine or femur, 24 subjects showed osteopenia at the lumbar spine or femur and 9 subjects had osteoporosis at the lumbar spine or femur. Regarding the association between DXA and MCI, 18 subjects showed some degree of bone loss at the spine detected by both DXA and the Klemetti index. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> PR may be useful to assess the risk of such diseases being present.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document