Assessing differences in hand dominance by testing hand preference against hand performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
PamelaMandela Idenya ◽  
Peter Gichangi ◽  
AOgeng'o Julius
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1848-1856
Author(s):  
P.M. Idenya ◽  
P. Gichangi ◽  
J. Ogeng’o

Several studies analyse anthropometric dimensions of the hands, but few look at how they influence hand performance or hand efficiency. In this analytic cross-sectional study conducted amongst 162 preclinical medical students, directional asymmetry was evaluated in relation to hand preference and hand efficiency in order to determine whether it can be used as an indicator for outcomes of hand dominance. Directional asymmetry (DA) was established by calculating differences in the mean hand measurements and the mean hand volumes. Hand preference was assessed using the modified Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, and handedness categories determined by applying the Geschwind Score. Hand dominance was categorized from the laterality score obtained from differences between left and right hands. Differences in hand dimensions were evaluated in relation to hand preference and hand efficiency. An apparent similarity in the morphology of the hands was suggested by the highly positive statistically significant result in the paired samples correlation test across all the parameters (p < 0.001). A positive association (not statistically significant) was noted between the handedness categories and the demonstrated directional asymmetry. No gender disparity was found in the relationship between DA and Hand efficiency by grip strength testing. The EHI-GS hand preference category positively indicated the preferred hand but did not on its own designate hand dominance or hand proficiency. Notwithstanding the gender, EHI-GS handedness neither predicted DA nor hand efficiency. Similarly, neither EHI-GS hand preference nor hand efficiency by grip strength testing could predict DA in males and females alike. Key words: Hand performance, Hand proficiency, Hand dominance, Grip strength testing, Laterality


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Chatagny ◽  
Simon Badoud ◽  
Mélanie Kaeser ◽  
Anne-Dominique Gindrat ◽  
Julie Savidan ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Lewandowski ◽  
David A. Kobus ◽  
Katherine L. Church ◽  
Karl Van Orden

Hand-grip strength, measured by a hand dynamometer, was compared with hand preference for writing in a sample of 173 male and female undergraduate students. Hand preference and performance correlated significantly, but superiority of hand grip for 24% of the subjects did not coincide with the preferred hand. Hand-grip performance was not an accurate predictor of hand preference, and neuropsychological inferences on the basis of hand performance should be made cautiously. No significant differences were found between the right/left ratio scores for males and females, or order conditions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL E.R. NICHOLLS ◽  
HEIDI L. CHAPMAN ◽  
TOBIAS LOETSCHER ◽  
GINA M. GRIMSHAW

AbstractThe idea that handedness indicates something about a person’s cognitive ability and personality is a perennial issue. A variety of models have been put forward to explain this relationship and predict a range of outcomes from higher levels of cognitive ability in left-handers or moderate right-handers to lower levels of achievement in left- or mixed-handers. We tested these models using a sample (n = 895) drawn from the BRAINnet database (www.brainnet.net). Participants completed a general cognitive ability (GCA) scale and a test of hand preference/performance. Moderate right-handers, as indexed by their performance measures, had higher GCA scores compared with strong left- or right-handers. The performance measure also showed lower levels of GCA for left-handers compared with right-handers. The hand preference data showed little or no association with cognitive ability—perhaps because this measure clusters individuals toward the extremes of the handedness distribution. While adding support to Annett’s heterozygous advantage model, which predicts a cognitive disadvantage for strong left- or right-handers, the data also confirm recent research showing a GCA disadvantage for left-handers. Although this study demonstrates that handedness is related to cognitive ability, the effects are subtle and might only be identified in large-scale studies with sensitive measures of hand performance. (JINS, 2010, 16, 585–592.)


1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutz Jäncke

Asymmetry of hand performance was investigated with the paper-and-pencil test of hand dominance originally developed by Steingruber in 1971. This test, originally constructed to measure asymmetry of hand performance in children, gave appropriate scores on asymmetry of hand performance in adults if a shorter time limit than originally proposed was applied. Asymmetry of hand performance in adults as measured with the new instruction showed reliable asymmetries in performance which are similar to those obtained on different widely accepted tests measuring asymmetries of hand performance.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uyen-Sa D. T. Nguyen ◽  
Alyssa B. Dufour ◽  
Rock G. Positano ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
Christopher C. Dodson ◽  
...  

Background: To our knowledge, hand dominance and side of foot disorders has not been described in the literature. We sought to evaluate whether hand dominance was associated with ipsilateral foot disorders in community-dwelling older men and women. Methods: Data were from the Framingham Foot Study (N = 2,089, examined 2002–2008). Hand preference for writing was used to classify hand dominance. Foot disorders and side of disorders were based on validated foot examination findings. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, accounting for intraperson variability. Results: Left-handed people were less likely to have foot pain or any foot disorders ipsilateral but were more likely to have hallux valgus ipsilateral to the left hand. Among right-handed people, the following statistically significant increased odds of having an ipsilateral versus contralateral foot disorder were seen: 30% for Morton’s neuroma, 18% for hammer toes, 21% for lesser toe deformity, and a twofold increased odds of any foot disorder; there was a 17% decreased odds for Tailor’s bunion and an 11% decreased odds for pes cavus. Conclusions: For the 2,089 study participants, certain forefoot disorders were shown to be ipsilateral and others were contralateral to the dominant hand. Future studies should examine whether the same biological mechanism that explains ipsilateral hand and foot preference may explain ipsilateral hand dominance and forefoot disorders. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 103(1): 16–23, 2013)


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Lise Doyen ◽  
Thierry Dufour ◽  
Xavier Caroff ◽  
Améziane Cherfouh ◽  
Michèle Carlier

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Scharoun ◽  
Pamela J. Bryden ◽  
Michael D. Sage ◽  
Quincy J. Almeida ◽  
Eric A. Roy

This study examined the influence of motor symptom asymmetry in Parkinson’s disease (PD) on Grooved Pegboard (GP) performance in right-handed participants. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale was used to assess motor symptoms and separate participants with PD into two groups (right-arm affected, left-arm affected) for comparison with a group of healthy older adults. Participants completed the place and replace GP tasks two times with both hands. Laterality quotients were computed to quantify performance differences between the two hands. Comparisons among the three groups indicated that when the nonpreferred hand is affected by PD motor symptoms, superior preferred hand performance (as seen in healthy older adults) is further exaggerated in tasks that require precision (i.e., place task). Regardless of the task, when the preferred hand is affected, there is an evident shift to superior left-hand performance, which may inevitably manifest as a switch in hand preference. Results add to the discussion of the relationship between handedness and motor symptom asymmetry in PD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document