scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in unresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A hospital-based retrospective evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sundaram Subramanian ◽  
Nithya Sridharan ◽  
V. Balasundaram ◽  
Sameer Chaudhari
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract Context: Role of nimotuzumab in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is well established in India; however, no clinical evidence is available for its role in recurrent and/or metastatic HNC. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab when added to standard treatment in unresectable, recurrent, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) Settings and Design: Hospital records of 14 patients diagnosed with recurrent and/or metastatic HNC with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma and being treated with nimotuzumab along with standard treatments from December 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Subjects and Methods: The tumor response rate and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Toxicity and adverse events (AEs) were assessed as per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v 4. Results: Oral cavity was most commonly involved region followed by hypopharynx and oropharynx. At 24 weeks after completion of treatment, overall response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) was 75%. Survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 77.80%, 64.81%, and 64.81%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.17 months, median OS was not reached. All AEs were either Grade I (66.7%) or Grade II (33.3%). No Grade III or Grade IV AEs were observed. No added toxicity was observed due to nimotuzumab. Conclusions: In the first of its kind study, the addition of nimotuzumab to standard treatment showed promising response rate as well as survival outcomes in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN patients without producing additional toxicity.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without Nimotuzumab in unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: Prospective comparative study - ESCORT-N study

2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Nilotpal Chakravarty ◽  
Sharad Bhatnagar ◽  
G. S. Chowdhary
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Abstract Background: Nimotuzumab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody which can be added to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to improve efficacy for management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN). We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab with CRT for LASCCHN and compared with CRT alone. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 29 LASCCHN (Stage III–IVb) patients received Nimotuzumab plus CRT or CRT alone. Treatment included six cycles of cisplatin (40–50 mg/week) or carboplatin (area under the curve-based), nimotuzumab (200 mg/week), and radiotherapy (60–70 Gy). Tumor response was evaluated as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. MoS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Toxicity and adverse events (AE's) were assessed as per CTCAE v 4.0. Results: At 24 weeks after completion of treatment, the tumor response rate (complete response, partial response, stable disease) was 53.3% and 35.7% favoring nimotuzumab arm while progression of disease was 40% and 35.7% in Nimotuzumab plus CRT and CRT groups, respectively. However, the objective response rate was 57% and 30% in favor of nimotuzumab arm. At median follow-up of 45.5 months, MoS was 33 months in Nimotuzumab plus CRT and 27 months in CRT group. The 5-year survival rate was 33.3% in Nimotuzumab plus CRT versus 7.1% in CRT group. Nimotuzumab was observed to be safe with no additional AE's such as hypersensitivity, hypomagnesemia, and allergic reaction was reported. Conclusion: Addition of Nimotuzumab to standard CRT showed improved survival rate in unresectable, LASCCHN patients without producing additional toxicity.

scholarly journals Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Response to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, non-comparative, open-label interventional pilot study

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Noronha ◽  
C Goswami ◽  
S Patil ◽  
A Joshi ◽  
V M Patil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Induction Regimen

AbstractBackground:Docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is an efficacious induction regimen but is more toxic than cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. This study aimed to determine whether docetaxel and cisplatin without 5-fluorouracil maintains efficacy while decreasing toxicity.Methods:A multicenter non-comparative pilot study of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was performed. Patients received primary therapy comprising three cycles of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate to the docetaxel and cisplatin induction regimen.Results:A total of 26 patients were enrolled: of these, 23 (88.5 per cent) received all three docetaxel and cisplatin cycles. Common grade 3–4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (19.2 per cent of patients), diarrhoea (19.2 per cent) and non-neutropenic infection (15.4 per cent). The overall response rate to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy was 65.4 per cent. A total of 23 patients (88.5 per cent) subsequently received chemoradiotherapy with a median radiotherapy dose of 70 Gy. The response rate to chemoradiotherapy was 73 per cent. At a median follow up of 44 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 62 per cent and 69 per cent, respectively.Conclusion:Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy is a feasible induction regimen with comparable efficacy to docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of radiotherapy/cetuximab versus radiotherapy/chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: a systematic review of published, primarily non-randomized, data

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097535
Author(s):  
Mei Mei ◽  
Yu-Huan Chen ◽  
Tian Meng ◽  
Ling-Han Qu ◽  
Zhi-Yong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Disease Specific

Background: Cetuximab (CTX) has been approved to be administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) to treat locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent CTX with RT (ExRT). Method: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE databases were systematically searched to find relevant articles. The combined hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the efficacy and safety of ExRT in contrast to concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with RT (ChRT). Results: In total, 32 articles with 4556 patients were included. The pooled HRs indicated that ExRT achieved an unfavorable overall survival (HR: 1.86, p < 0.0001), disease-specific survival (HR: 2.58, p = 0.002), locoregional control (HR: 1.94, p < 0.00001), and progression-free survival (HR: 2.04, p = 0.003) compared with ChRT for locally advanced HNSCC patients. In human papillomavirus-positive patient subgroups, ExRT showed inferior disease-specific survival (HR: 2.55, p = 0.009) and locoregional control (HR: 2.27, p < 0.0001) in contrast to ChRT. Additionally, ExRT increased the occurrence of mucositis (RR: 1.17, p < 0.005), skin toxicity (RR: 6.26, p < 0.00001), and infection (RR: 2.27, p = 0.04) compared with non-CTX groups (ChRT and RT), and was associated with lower incidence of anemia (RR: 0.35, p = 0.009), leukocytopenia (RR: 0.17, p < 0.0001), neutropenia (RR: 0.06, p < 0.0001), nausea/vomiting (RR: 0.23, p < 0.0001), and renal toxicity (RR: 0.14, p = 0.007). Conclusion: ChRT should remain the standard treatment for locally advanced HNSCC patients. ExRT was recognized as an effective alternative treatment for locally advanced HNSCC patients who experienced unbearable toxicities caused by non-CTX treatments.

Phase II study of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: Trial of the Cancer Research Group Pakistan

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15520-15520 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Javed ◽  
A. Shaharyar ◽  
I. H. Shah ◽  
M. A. Shah ◽  
T. N. Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

15520 Background: The optimum radiosensitizing dose and schedule of gemcitabine for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck are not known. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer concurrent with radical radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. Method: Thirty-nine patients with stage III or IV B inoperable carcinoma of head and neck were enrolled. Eligible patients had histopathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma with age between 18–70 years. Patients had a KPS >70 with an adequate marrow, hepatic and renal function. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy was allowed. Patients with nasopharyngeal, glottic or sub-glottic cancer were excluded. Gemcitabine 150 mg/m2 or a total dose not exceeding 200 mg was given on day 1,8,15,22,29, and 36 during radiation treatment. Gemcitabine was infused in 200 ml of normal saline in 2 hours and radiation was delivered two hours after the completion of gemcitabine infusion. Conventional fractionation was used to deliver a total dose of 66 Gy. CTC version 2.0 of NCI and RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme were used for evaluation of toxicity and RECIST was used for response evaluation. Results: Only 35 patients were considered evaluable for response. Complete response was seen in 8 (22.9%) (95% CI; 10.4–40.1%), partial response in 25 (71.4%), with an overall response rate of 94.3% (95% CI; 80.8–99.3%). All the thirty-nine patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 mucositis was seen in 28 (71.8%) and 2 (5.1%) patients respectively. Grade 3 pharyngeal toxicity was seen in 6 (15.4%). One patient developed pharyngo-cutaneous fistula. Despite vigorous symptomatic and supportive care acute toxicities led to treatment interruption in 16 (41%) of patients. Conclusion: Weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 150mg/m2 concurrent with radiation therapy gives a high overall response rate and a high rate of acute toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Cisplatin Plus Placebo Compared With Cisplatin Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic/Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8646-8654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Burtness ◽  
Meredith A. Goldwasser ◽  
William Flood ◽  
Bassam Mattar ◽  
Arlene A. Forastiere
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose Therapy of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck results in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 months. These cancers are rich in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We wished to determine whether the addition of cetuximab, which inhibits activation of EGFR, would improve PFS. Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin every 4 weeks, with weekly cetuximab (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Tumor tissue was assayed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points of interest were response rate, toxicity, overall survival, and correlation of EGFR with clinical end points. Results There were 117 analyzable patients enrolled. Median PFS was 2.7 months for arm B and 4.2 months for arm A. The hazard ratio for progression of arm A to arm B was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.12). Median overall survival was 8.0 months for arm B and 9.2 months for arm A (P = .21). The hazard ratio for survival by skin toxicity in cetuximab-treated patients was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86). Objective response rate was 26% for arm A and 10% for arm B (P = .03). Enhancement of response was greater for patients with EGFR staining present in less than 80% of cells. Conclusion Addition of cetuximab to cisplatin significantly improves response rate. There was a survival advantage for the development of rash. Progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved by the addition of cetuximab in this study.

Intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II study of radiotherapy with cisplatin and 7-week continuous infusional fluorouracil.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1192-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Wibault ◽  
M A Bensmaine ◽  
M de Forni ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
E Tellez Bernal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
World Health ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Who Grade

PURPOSE To evaluate an intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocol of conventional radiotherapy with intermittent cisplatin (CDDP) and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) in unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients with unresectable stage IV MO disease (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]/American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], 1987) received radiotherapy 70 Gy followed by CDDP 80 mg/m2 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d. Response was assessed 2 months after treatment completion. RESULTS Thirty patients (52%) received the full treatment schedule; 53 (93%) received full-dose radiotherapy, while 48 (84%) were given at least 75% of the planned chemotherapy doses. Severe mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO]) grade 3 to 4 was the limiting toxicity and was seen in 79% of patients. The median time for mucositis resolution was 8 weeks. Other toxicities were generally manageable, but there were four treatment related deaths (7%). Fifty patients were assessable for activity, with an overall response rate of 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 82%). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 42% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSION This simultaneous combined-modality regimen was feasible at the cost of severe mucosal toxicity, which required hospitalization with nutritional, parenteral, and hydroelectrolytic support. The high response rate achieved (70%) did not translate into improved survival, probably due to patient eligibility. The likelihood of cure of this high-tumoral-volume patient population remains low (approximately 10%), despite the association of two therapeutic modalities at full standard therapeutic intensity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document