Root-rot resistance in common bean

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 365-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Tu ◽  
S. J. Park

A bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) line, A - 300, resistant to Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum was introduced into Ontario from Colombia. The results of tests conducted in a root-rot nursery, in a greenhouse and in a growth room showed that this bean line is resistant to Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli and Pythium ultimum. Key words: Bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, root rot resistance

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 240-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Eke ◽  
Gael Chatue Chatue ◽  
Louise Nana Wakam ◽  
Rufin Marie Toghueo Kouipou ◽  
Patrick Valère Tsouh Fokou ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 1351-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suheidy Valentín Torres ◽  
María M. Vargas ◽  
Graciela Godoy-Lutz ◽  
Timothy G. Porch ◽  
James S. Beaver

In common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Rhizoctonia solani Kühn is an important pathogen causing web blight (WB) in the tropics, and it is also a soilborne pathogen causing root rot (RR) worldwide. This pathogen is a species complex classified into 14 anastomosis groups (AG). AG 1-IA, AG 1-IB, AG 1-IE, AG 1-IF, AG 2-2, and AG 4 have been reported to cause WB of the aboveground structures of the plant, while AG 4 and AG 2-2 have been associated with RR. There is limited information, however, concerning the ability of particular isolates of specific AG to cause both diseases in common bean. Nine R. solani isolates, including three AG 1 and three AG 4 WB isolates and three AG 4 RR isolates collected from both leaves and roots, respectively, of common bean in Puerto Rico, were used to evaluate the response of 12 common bean genotypes to WB inoculated using a detached-leaf method and to RR inoculated using a solution suspension of R. solani mycelia in the greenhouse. All R. solani isolates were able to induce both RR and WB symptoms. RR readings were generally more severe than the WB readings. The RR isolate RR1 (AG 4) produced the most severe RR scores. A few bean lines had mean RR scores ≤4.4 for specific R. solani isolates on a scale of 1 to 9, with 1 representing resistant and 9 highly susceptible. However, all of the bean lines had mean RR scores ≥5.0 when inoculated with the isolates RR1, RR2, and RR3, which were determined to be AG 4 in this study. Significant line–isolate interactions were observed for the WB and RR inoculations for the three planting dates, suggesting a differential response of the common bean lines to the pathogen. This genotypic interaction may require bean breeders and pathologists to monitor the virulence patterns of R. solani in specific growing environments, while the compatibility of specific R. solani isolates to both aerial and root tissue needs to be considered for disease control strategies.


1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Reddy ◽  
R. K. Hynes ◽  
G. Lazarovits

One hundred and twenty diverse bacterial strains were screened under greenhouse conditions for their ability to protect white bean seedlings from preemergence damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani and postemergence root rot by Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli. Preemergence mortality or root rot increased with an increase in the inoculum concentration of fungal isolates. For further testing, 200 propagules/g soil of P. ultimum, 3 propagules/g soil of R. solani, and log 3 conidia/g vermiculite of F. solani f.sp. phaseoli were used, as these rates provided an optimal level (approximately 50%) of disease severity. Bacterial strains suspended in sterile distilled water were added to pathogen-amended soil or vermiculite at log 7 colony-forming units/g soil or vermiculite prior to seeding. Final healthy stand and root rot were recorded 4 weeks after planting. Nine bacterial strains on P. ultimum, five on R. solani, and nine on F. solani f.sp. phaseoli provided significant (P = 0.05) suppression of disease severity compared with the nonbacterized control. Bacterial strains were also tested in vitro against the mycelial growth of the fungi on solid and liquid media. There was no relationship between the ability of bacterial strains to inhibit fungal vegetative growth on solid culture media and their ability to suppress pathogen activity in the greenhouse, but, for a few strains, the reduction in disease was linked to reduced growth of the pathogens in liquid media.Key words: White bean, damping-off, root rot, Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hammad Abdelwanees Ketta ◽  
Omar Abd El-Raouf Hewedy

Abstract Background Root rot pathogens reported to cause considerable losses in both the quality and productivity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.). It is an aggressive crop disease with detriment economic influence caused by Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani among other soil-borne fungal pathogens. Destructive plant diseases such as root rot have been managed in the last decades using synthetic pesticides. Main body Seeking of economical and eco-friendly alternatives to combat aggressive soil-borne fungal pathogens that cause significant yield losses is urgently needed. Trichoderma emerged as promising antagonist that inhibits pathogens including those inducing root rot disease. Detailed studies for managing common bean and pea root rot disease using different Trichoderma species (T. harzianum, T. hamatum, T. viride, T. koningii, T. asperellum, T. atroviridae, T. lignorum, T. virens, T. longibrachiatum, T. cerinum, and T. album) were reported both in vitro and in vivo with promotion of plant growth and induction of systemic defense. The wide scale application of selected metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. to induce host resistance and/or to promote crop yield, may represent a powerful tool for the implementation of integrated pest management strategies. Conclusions Biological management of common bean and pea root rot-inducing pathogens using various species of the Trichoderma fungus might have taken place during the recent years. Trichoderma species and their secondary metabolites are useful in the development of protection against root rot to bestow high-yielding common bean and pea crops.


1977 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Russell ◽  
A. E. A. Mussa

SummaryTwo systemic fungicides, benomyl and thiabendazole, were more active than the non-systemic fungicide Drazoxolon in inhibiting fungal growth in vitro. A similar pattern was obtained in glasshouse trials with benomyl and thiabendazole giving adequate protection at low concentrations while Drazoxolon was ineffective unless applied at 50% the commercial product concentration. A field trial using thiabendazole, Drazoxolon and a mixture of benomyl and thiram confirmed the glasshouse results.Some phytotoxicity was noticed with high concentrations of both benomyl and thiabendazole, but satisfactory disease control was achieved using fungicide concentrations which did not induce phytotoxicity.


1963 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kerr

At least four fungal pathogens are involved in the root rot-Fusarium wilt complex of peas which is a serious problem following intensive cropping of peas in South Australia. The pathogens are Fusarium oxysporum f. pisi race 2 Snyder & Hansen, F. solani f. pisi Snyder & Hansen, Pythium ultimum Trow, and Ascochyta pinodella L. K. Jones. In susceptible pea cultivars there is a marked interaction between F. oxysporum and P. ultimum. P. ultimum alone causes initial stunting from which plants gradually recover; F. OX1Jsporum alone probably CRuses little damage; both fungi together CRuse initial stunting followed by severe wilt symptom about 6 weeks after sowing and death 2 weeks later. The importance ofF. solani and A. pinodella has not been fully determined, but they probably cause only minor damage.


2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Caron ◽  
L. Laverdière ◽  
P.O. Thibodeau ◽  
R.R. Bélanger

Le potentiel antagoniste du biofongicide à base de Trichoderma harzianum MAUL-20, isolé au Québec, a été testé contre cinq agents telluriques phytopathogènes(Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici (FORL), Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum et Verticillium dahliae) du concombre et de la tomate de serre. Le biofongicide a démontré une efficacité contre P. ultimum et R. solani chez le concombre et la tomate et contre FORL chez la tomate. De plus, T. harzianum MAUL-20 a eu un effet stimulant sur le développement des plants de concombre lorsque cultivés, sans agents pathogènes, dans un substrat organique alimenté du biofongicide. L'efficacité de T. harzianum MAUL-20 a été comparée à celle du biofongicide américain Rootshield™ (Trichoderma harzianum KRL-AG2) et le premier a démontré une activité antagoniste égale ou supérieure à celle de Rootshield™.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document