scholarly journals Properties of Poly (Carbonate)/Vapor-Grown Carbon Fiber Composite Prepared by Melt compounding

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jittiwat NITHIKARNJANATHARN ◽  
Hisai UEDA ◽  
Shuichi TANOUE ◽  
Hideyuki UEMATSU ◽  
Yoshiyuki IEMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Fiber Composite ◽  
Carbon Fiber Composite ◽  
Melt Compounding ◽  
Poly Carbonate

scholarly journals Preparation and Properties of Polypropylene/Vapor Grown Carbon Fiber Composite Monofilaments by Melt Compounding

2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terumasa KOYAMA ◽  
Shuichi TANOUE ◽  
Yoshiyuki IEMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Fiber Composite ◽  
Carbon Fiber Composite ◽  
Melt Compounding

Cytocompatibility of Carbon Nanofiber Materials for Neural Applications

2003 ◽  
Vol 774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice L. McKenzie ◽  
Michael C. Waid ◽  
Riyi Shi ◽  
Thomas J. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Carbon Nanofibers ◽  
Carbon Fibers ◽  
Carbon Nanofiber ◽  
Fiber Composite ◽  
Scar Tissue ◽  
Pc 12 Cells ◽  
Low Surface Energy ◽  
Poly Carbonate

AbstractSince the cytocompatibility of carbon nanofibers with respect to neural applications remains largely uninvestigated, the objective of the present in vitro study was to determine cytocompatibility properties of formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Carbon fiber substrates were prepared from four different types of carbon fibers, two with nanoscale diameters (nanophase, or less than or equal to 100 nm) and two with conventional diameters (or greater than 200 nm). Within these two categories, both a high and a low surface energy fiber were investigated and tested. Astrocytes (glial scar tissue-forming cells) and pheochromocytoma cells (PC-12; neuronal-like cells) were seeded separately onto the substrates. Results provided the first evidence that astrocytes preferentially adhered on the carbon fiber that had the largest diameter and the lowest surface energy. PC-12 cells exhibited the most neurites on the carbon fiber with nanodimensions and low surface energy. These results may indicate that PC-12 cells prefer nanoscale carbon fibers while astrocytes prefer conventional scale fibers. A composite was formed from poly-carbonate urethane and the 60 nm carbon fiber. Composite substrates were thus formed using different weight percentages of this fiber in the polymer matrix. Increased astrocyte adherence and PC-12 neurite density corresponded to decreasing amounts of the carbon nanofibers in the poly-carbonate urethane matrices. Controlling carbon fiber diameter may be an approach for increasing implant contact with neurons and decreasing scar tissue formation.

Prestressed Carbon Fiber Composite Overwrapped Gun Tube

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Littlefield ◽  
Edward Hyland ◽  
Jack Keating
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Fiber Composite ◽  
Carbon Fiber Composite

scholarly journals Lightweight Cellulose/Carbon Fiber Composite Foam for Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding

Polymers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Li ◽  
Huiping Lin ◽  
Piao Lan ◽  
Jie Gao ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Carbon Fibers ◽  
Electromagnetic Interference ◽  
Fiber Composite ◽  
Carbon Fiber Composites ◽  
Shielding Effectiveness ◽  
Electromagnetic Interference Shielding ◽  
Carbon Fiber Composite ◽  
Foaming Process ◽  
Long Carbon Fibers

Lightweight electromagnetic interference shielding cellulose foam/carbon fiber composites were prepared by blending cellulose foam solution with carbon fibers and then freeze drying. Two kinds of carbon fiber (diameter of 7 μm) with different lengths were used, short carbon fibers (SCF, L/D = 100) and long carbon fibers (LCF, L/D = 300). It was observed that SCFs and LCFs built efficient network structures during the foaming process. Furthermore, the foaming process significantly increased the specific electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness from 10 to 60 dB. In addition, cellulose/carbon fiber composite foams possessed good mechanical properties and low thermal conductivity of 0.021–0.046 W/(m·K).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document