Mouth breathing – A predictor for patient satisfaction after  nasal septoplasty?

Background: No reliable marker exists to predict septoplasty outcome. Most patients suffering from nasal airway obstruction (NAO) caused by a deviation of the nasal septum report a bothersome mouth breathing and dryness. In this study our aim was to assess, whether mouth breathing could be objectified in these patients and whether mouth breathing could predict septoplasty outcome. Methods: A monocentric, prospective case-control study of 21 patients was conducted. The proportion of mouth breathing was measured in a blinded manner. As a measurement of patient satisfaction, subjective symptoms pre- and postoperatively, were assessed by using VAS, NOSE and SNOT-20 score. In the patient group an additional acoustic rhinometry and a clinical examination of the nose were performed. Results: With a mean of 25% (SD = 20%) the proportion of mouth breathing in patients with NAO did not differ significantly from the proportion in controls without NAO, with a mean of 27% (SD = 23%). Analysis of subjective scores revealed a significant reduction of subjective symptoms after septoplasty. A higher preoperative proportion of mouth breathing correlated with more remaining postoperative NAO. Conclusions: The percentage of mouth breathing is no different in patients with symptomatic septal deviation than in control patients. Mouth breathing in patients with NAO, evaluated for septoplasty, could be a negative predictive factor for patient satisfaction after nasal septoplasty. Mouth breathing in these patients should be observed carefully because more preoperative mouth breathing should make one more hesitant to consider septoplasty.

Download Full-text

Telemedicine and patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case–control study of outpatient pediatric urology patients

Journal of Child Health Care ◽

10.1177/13674935211058272 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 136749352110582

Author(s):

Sarah A Holzman ◽

Carol A Davis-Dao ◽

Antoine E Khoury ◽

Michelle A Fortier ◽

Zeev N Kain

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Conditional Logistic Regression ◽

Patient Survey ◽

Pediatric Urology ◽

Rank Test ◽

Signed Rank ◽

Signed Rank Test ◽

Urology Clinic ◽

Control Study

Telemedicine has increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our objective was to determine if patient satisfaction with telemedicine differed from in-person visits in an academic pediatric urology clinic. Following outpatient telemedicine and in-person pediatric urology visits, the validated NRC Health© Patient Survey was used to assess patient experience. Patient satisfaction was assessed on a 10-point scale with scores of 9–10 considered “satisfied” and 1–8 considered “not satisfied.” Satisfaction scores between telemedicine and in-person groups were compared using McNemar’s test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and conditional logistic regression. Fifty-one patients had urology telemedicine visits during April–August 2020 and completed the NRC Health© Patient Survey. Propensity score matching was used to identify 102 in-person controls between January 2019 and March 2020. Ninety-two percent of telemedicine patients were satisfied compared to 87% of in-person patients (OR 1.7 95% CI [0.53–5.6]). Regression analysis adjusting for matching variables demonstrated that patient satisfaction was higher for telemedicine compared to in-person visits but was not statistically significant (OR 1.5 95% CI [0.43–5.6]). Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was similar to in-person visits in the pediatric urology clinic. Reduced waiting time and convenience associated with telemedicine visits provide an opportunity for telemedicine as a useful modality for pediatric urology.

Download Full-text

Association of childhood tracheomalacia with bronchiectasis: a case–control study

Archives of Disease in Childhood ◽

10.1136/archdischild-2021-322578 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. archdischild-2021-322578

Author(s):

Rahul Thomas ◽

Anne Chang ◽

Ian Brent Masters ◽

Keith Grimwood ◽

Julie Marchant ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Case Control Study ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Lower Airway ◽

Common Symptom ◽

European Respiratory Society ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Blinded Manner ◽

Control Study

ObjectiveChildren with tracheomalacia can develop chronic lower airway infection and neutrophilic inflammation. It is plausible children with tracheomalacia are at increased risk of developing bronchiectasis. We hypothesised that compared with controls, tracheomalacia in children is associated with bronchiectasis.DesignSingle-centre, case–control study.Setting and patients45 children with chest high-resolution CT (c-HRCT) confirmed bronchiectasis (cases) and enrolled in the Australian Bronchiectasis Registry were selected randomly from Queensland, and 90 unmatched children without chronic respiratory symptoms or radiographic evidence of bronchiectasis (disease controls). Cases and controls had flexible bronchoscopy performed for clinical reasons within 4 weeks of their c-HRCT.InterventionsThe bronchoscopy videos were reviewed in a blinded manner for: (a) any tracheomalacia (any shape deformity of the trachea at end-expiration) and (b) tracheomalacia defined by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement (>50% expiratory reduction in the cross-sectional luminal area).Main outcome measures and resultsCases were younger (median age=2.6 years, IQR 1.5–4.1) than controls (7.8 years, IQR 3.4–12.8), but well-balanced for sex (56% and 52% male, respectively). Using multivariable analysis (adjusted for age), the presence of any tracheomalacia was significantly associated with bronchiectasis (adjusted OR (ORadj)=13.2, 95% CI 3.2 to 55), while that for ERS-defined tracheomalacia further increased this risk (ORadj=24.4, 95% CI 3.4 to infinity).ConclusionBronchoscopic-defined tracheomalacia is associated with childhood bronchiectasis. While causality cannot be inferred, children with tracheomalacia should be monitored for chronic (>4 weeks) wet cough, the most common symptom of bronchiectasis, which if present should be treated and then investigated if the cough persists or is recurrent.

Download Full-text