scholarly journals Heavy Metal Contamination of Surface Soil in Relationship to Land Use Patterns: A Case Study of Benue State, Nigeria

2010 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Iorfa Adamu ◽  
Therese Ntonzi Nganje
Author(s):  
Caili Sun ◽  
Sixi Zhu ◽  
Bin Zhao ◽  
Wujiang Li ◽  
Xiaoye Gao ◽  
...  

Land use conversion could directly or indirectly influence heavy metal geochemistry by changing soil properties. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of land use conversion on surface soil heavy metal contamination in the karst plateau lakeshore wetlands of Southwest China. Based on this, a total of 120 soil samples were collected from 30 sites from different types of land uses (farmlands, grasslands and woodlands) around a lake in Suohuangcang National Wetland Park in August 2017. Contents of As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Hg, Pb and Zn were analyzed, and soil heavy metal contamination was assessed in all three land use types. Results showed that land use transformation from farmland to grassland or woodland was not conducive to the release of soil heavy metal. Surface soil of all three land use types have been moderately polluted by As, Cr, Pb, and Zn, and grassland and woodland also had moderate Cd contamination. The pollution load index (PLI) results revealed low heavy metal contamination in grassland and woodland but no contamination in farmland. Although the integrated contamination in the studied region did not pose a serious potential ecological risk (RI < 150), it might affect human health through the water supply and food chain. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor and control As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn concentrations of surface soil through controlling pollutants, improving waste treatment, as well as strengthening supervision and management in the vicinity of the Suohuangcang National Wetland Park.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1532-1549
Author(s):  
S. Maryam Hosseini ◽  
Mana Kamranjam ◽  
Roger Brewer ◽  
Maryam Rezazadeh ◽  
Mahlagha Ghorbanli

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2739-2748 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Zhao ◽  
B. J. Fu ◽  
L. D. Chen

Abstract. Land use and land cover are most important in quantifying soil erosion. Based on the C-factor of the popular soil erosion model, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and a scale-pattern-process theory in landscape ecology, we proposed a multi-scale soil loss evaluation index (SL) to evaluate the effects of land use patterns on soil erosion. We examined the advantages and shortcomings of SL for small watershed (SLsw) by comparing to the C-factor used in RUSLE. We used the Yanhe watershed located on China's Loess Plateau as a case study to demonstrate the utilities of SLsw. The SLsw calculation involves the delineations of the drainage network and sub-watershed boundaries, the calculations of soil loss horizontal distance index, the soil loss vertical distance index, slope steepness, rainfall-runoff erosivity, soil erodibility, and cover and management practice. We used several extensions within the geographic information system (GIS), and AVSWAT2000 hydrological model to derive all the required GIS layers. We compared the SLsw with the C-factor to identify spatial patterns to understand the causes for the differences. The SLsw values for the Yanhe watershed are in the range of 0.15 to 0.45, and there are 593 sub-watersheds with SLsw values that are lower than the C-factor values (LOW) and 227 sub-watersheds with SLsw values higher than the C-factor values (HIGH). The HIGH area have greater rainfall-runoff erosivity than LOW area for all land use types. The cultivated land is located on the steeper slope or is closer to the drainage network in the horizontal direction in HIGH area in comparison to LOW area. The results imply that SLsw can be used to identify the effect of land use distribution on soil loss, whereas the C-factor has less power to do it. Both HIGH and LOW areas have similar soil erodibility values for all land use types. The average vertical distances of forest land and sparse forest land to the drainage network are shorter in LOW area than that in HIGH area. Other land use types have shorter average vertical distances in HIGH area than that LOW area. SLsw has advantages over C-factor in its ability to specify the subwatersheds that require the land use patterns optimization by adjusting the locations of land uses to minimize soil loss.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document