scholarly journals ProX: XML for interfacing with XML for processing XML (and an XForm to go with it)

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Nordström
Keyword(s):  
End User ◽  
Abstraction Layer ◽  
Shell Script

The process XML or ProX for short was introduced to create an abstraction layer around running XProc pipelines. While XProc is XML, running XProc pipelines using an actual engine involves a lot more, usually batch or shell scripts that configure the engine and whatever inputs and options, etc, that the pipeline defines, which is something of a pain. Offering the resulting configuration options to an end user in a GUI is difficult at best and a nightmare for any conscientious developer. This paper describes an XML-based abstraction layer that defines all those configuration options. The XML is made available to the user so s/he can configure the pipeline and whatever options it has, and save the configured process as an instance that is then converted to a shell script that runs the configured pipeline, greatly simplifying the configuration.

Using XML to Implement XML

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Nordström
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Document Management ◽  
End User ◽  
Abstraction Layer ◽  
Document Management System ◽  
Black Boxes

This paper discusses implementing XProc-based publishing and processing in a document management system that is currently very difficult to expand because even though it handles and processes XML, the system is currently implemented in a way that makes any changes to publishing and processing difficult. The author currently depends on C# developers without XML knowledge for any changes. The paper suggests using XML to implement the XProc pipelines with, handling everything from the .bat files for the XProc engine to the GUI that makes the pipelines available to the end user. This XML can be used to generate both, but is also useful as an abstraction layer that black-boxes not only the XProc but everything surrounding it, providing a blueprint for the processes, simplifying development and, for the author, eliminating an unwanted dependency to C# developers.

scholarly journals Abstracting container technologies and transfer mechanisms in the Scalable CyberInfrastructure for Artificial Intelligence and Likelihood Free Inference (SCAILFIN) project

2020 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 07023
Author(s):  
Kenyi Hurtado Anampa ◽  
Cody Kankel ◽  
Mike Hildreth ◽  
Paul Brenner ◽  
Irena Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Workflow Management ◽  
Workflow Engine ◽  
End User ◽  
Abstraction Layer ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Performance Computing ◽  
Workflow Application ◽  
Transfer Mechanisms

High Performance Computing (HPC) facilities provide vast computational power and storage, but generally work on fixed environments designed to address the most common software needs locally, making it challenging for users to bring their own software. To overcome this issue, most HPC facilities have added support for HPC friendly container technologies such as Shifter, Singularity, or Charliecloud. These different container technologies are all compatible with the more popular Docker containers, however the implementation and use of said containers is different for each HPC friendly container technology. These usage differences can make it difficult for an end user to easily submit and utilize different HPC sites without making adjustments to their workflows and software. This issue is exacerbated when attempting to utilize workflow management software between different sites with differing container technologies. The SCAILFIN project aims to develop and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) and likelihood-free inference (LFI) techniques and software using scalable cyberinfrastructure (CI) that span multiple sites. The project has extended the CERN-based REANA framework, a platform designed to enable analysis reusability, and reproducibility while supporting different workflow engine languages, in order to support submission to different HPC facilities. The work presented here focuses on the development of an abstraction layer that allows the support of different container technologies and different transfer protocols for files and directories between the HPC facility and the REANA cluster edge service from the user’s workflow application.

Technology characteristics predicting end user acceptance of smart intravenous infusion pumps

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tosha B. Wetterneck ◽  
Pascale Carayon ◽  
Folasade Sobande ◽  
Ann Schoofs Hundt
Keyword(s):  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
User Acceptance ◽  
End User ◽  
Infusion Pumps

Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi UG In Your Hand Dengan Metode End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS)

ICIT Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-226
Author(s):  
Eka Fitri Rahayu
Keyword(s):  
Ease Of Use ◽  
End User ◽  
End User Computing

Informasi sangat dibutuhkan dalam pengambilan keputusan. Sistem informasi yang efektif adalah sistem informasi yang harus mampu memberikan kepuasan kepada para penggunanya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) dengan Instrumen Accuracy, Content, Format, Timeliness dan Ease of Use terhadap kepuasan pengguna sistem UG In Your Hand. Data yang digunakan sebanyak 96 responden yang diperoleh melalui kuesioner online yang dibagikan kepada Mahasiswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan model Regresi Linier Berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Instrumen Ease of Use dan Timeliness mempengaruhi kepuasan pengguna sistem, selain itu Instrumen Content, Accuracy dan Format tidak mempengaruhi kepuasan pengguna sistem UG In Your Hand.   Kata Kunci : Kepuasan Pengguna, UG In Your Hand, Metode EUCS

Bridging the gap between end user needs and science capability: decision making under uncertainty

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
AS Kiem ◽  
DC Verdon-Kidd ◽  
EK Austin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
User Needs ◽  
Decision Making Under Uncertainty ◽  
End User

From Legislators to the End-User

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
End User

HEURISTIC EVALUATION FOR MOBILE APPLICATION (STUDI KASUS: APLIKASI DEPO AUTO 2000 TANJUNG API API PALEMBANG)

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usman Ependi
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Usability Testing ◽  
Heuristic Evaluation ◽  
End User ◽  
Error Prevention ◽  
The Real ◽  
User Control ◽  
Cosmetic Problem

Heuristic evaluation merupakan salah satu bentuk usability testing perangkat lunak yang dinilai oleh pengguna (evaluator). Dalam melakukan heuristic evaluation instrumen penilaian terdiri dari sepuluh (10) pernyataan dengan lima pilihan jawaban dalam skala severity ratings. Dalam penelitian ini heuristic evaluation terhadap aplikasi Depo Auto 2000 Tanjung Api-Api Palembang yang dilakukan oleh 4 evaluator.  Hasil dari heuristic evaluation dikelompokkan kedalam  masing-masing instrumen yaitu visibility of system status dengan nilai 0,75, match between system and the real world dengan nilai 0,25, user control and freedom dengan nilai 0,25, consistency and standards dengan nilai 0,75, error prevention dengan nilai 1, recognition rather than recall dengan nilai 1,25, flexibility and efficiency of use dengan nilai 0,25, Aesthetic and minimalist design dengan nilai 0,25, help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors dengan nilai 1 dan Help and documentation dengan nilai 0. Dari hasil heuristic evaluation yang dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa evaluator memberikan nilai 0 dan 1 aplikasi Depo Atuo 2000 Tanjung Api-Api Palembang. Hasil penilaian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa aplikasi yang buat tidak ada masalah usability dan hanya memiliki cosmetic problem sehingga aplikasi Depo Auto 2000 Tanjung Api Api Palembang  dapat dinyatakan layak untuk didistribusikan kepada pengguna akhir (end user). 

EURODEMO: End-user needs

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Edwards
Keyword(s):  
User Needs ◽  
End User

End-User Searching: Philosophy and Practise

1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-593
Author(s):  
R. E. Buntrock
Keyword(s):  
End User
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document