Differences Between the US and the EU Fuel Regulation Policies: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. RFG Program and the EU Auto Oil I Program

Author(s):  
Sandrine Dixson-Declève
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  
The U.S ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. 132-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Uzun

The article deals with the features of the Russian policy of agriculture support in comparison with the EU and the US policies. Comparative analysis is held considering the scales and levels of collective agriculture support, sources of supporting means, levels and mechanisms of support of agricultural production manufacturers, its consumers, agrarian infrastructure establishments, manufacturers and consumers of each of the principal types of agriculture production. The author makes an attempt to estimate the consequences of Russia’s accession to the World Trade Organization based on a hypothesis that this will result in unification of the manufacturers and consumers’ protection levels in Russia with the countries that have long been WTO members.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Brougher

With many blockbuster biologic drugs coming off patent in the next couple of years, biosimilars are making significant breakthroughs in cost-effective biologic therapies. The global market for biosimilars is expected to increase nearly 30 fold from $1.3 billion in 2013 to $35 billion by 2020. To promote biosimilar development and commercialization in the U.S., the Biosimilars Act was signed into law in 2010 to establish an abbreviated pathway by which the FDA could approve biosimilar versions of previously licensed biological products. Since its enactment, two biosimilars have been approved in the U.S. This Article will discuss key aspects of the U.S., the EU and Japanese approval pathways and will explore their likely impact on the commercialization of biosimilar medicines.  


Author(s):  
Oleg Prikhodko

The European Union is an important player in the U.S. policies aimed at maintaining liberal world order. The US-EU interaction has been shaped by a number of key variables, including international environment, specific goals of the U.S. administrations, institutional maturing of the EU, and a complex interplay of American and European diverging and overlapping interests. President D. Trump’s tenure was the most strained period in the US-EU relations, with an erosion of mutual trust and a ghost of trade war looming large. The Biden administration has reversed the U.S. policy towards the European Union. The US-EU summit held last June signified a return of normality in the relations of the transatlantic partners. Washington and Brussels outlined a broad agenda that embraces security, trade and economic issues, coordination in international affairs (concerning, in particular, Russia, China, and Iran), cooperation in decarbonizing of the world economy and promotion of a climate-friendly environment. A broad web of links between the United States and Europe facilitates their joining efforts in addressing global and regional challenges. Although, the US and the EU reached a series of compromises to mitigate their most acrimonious disagreements (Boeing–Airbus subsidies dispute is a vivid example in this regard), there are still unsettled major issues like a comprehensive free trade treaty unsuccessfully negotiated since the Obama presidency. The “Chinese factor” may turn out to be the most divisive one in the transatlantic relations, since the U.S. tough policy towards Beijing makes the EU countries to take hard decisions they prefer to avoid. While it is premature to predict precise implications of the Biden administration’s policy, one can reasonably expect the EU to become a more helpful partner to Washington in diplomatic and economic affairs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document