Common Rail Fuel Injection System for Improvement of Engine Performance on Heavy Duty Diesel Engine

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuro Kato ◽  
Takeshi Koyama ◽  
Kenji Sasaki ◽  
Koji Mori ◽  
Kazutoshi Mori
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Common Rail ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Fuel Injection System ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Application of Common Rail Fuel Injection System to a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Yamaki ◽  
Kazutoshi Mori ◽  
Hiroshi Kamikubo ◽  
Susumu Kohketsu ◽  
Kohji Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Common Rail ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Fuel Injection System ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Next Improvement Potentials for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine - Tailor the Fuel Injection System to the Combustion Needs

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1119-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jost Weber ◽  
Olaf Herrmann ◽  
Ron Puts ◽  
Jyun Kawamura ◽  
Yasufumi Tomida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Fuel Injection System ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Fuel Property Effects on PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosmin E. Dumitrescu ◽  
W. Stuart Neill ◽  
Hongsheng Guo ◽  
Vahid Hosseini ◽  
Wallace L. Chippior
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Fuel Property ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Soot Emissions ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

An experimental study was performed to investigate fuel property effects on premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI) combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. A matrix of research diesel fuels designed by the Coordinating Research Council, referred to as the Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE), was used. The fuel matrix design covers a wide range of cetane numbers (30 to 55), 90% distillation temperatures (270 to 340 °C) and aromatics content (20 to 45%). The fuels were tested in a single-cylinder Caterpillar diesel engine equipped with a common-rail fuel injection system. The engine was operated at 900 rpm, a relative air/fuel ratio of 1.2 and 60% exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) for all fuels. The study was limited to a single fuel injection event starting between −30° and 0 °CA after top dead center (aTDC) with a rail pressure of 150 MPa. The brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) ranged from 2.6 to 3.1 bar depending on the fuel and its injection timing. The experimental results show that cetane number was the most important fuel property affecting PCCI combustion behavior. The low cetane number fuels had better brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) due to more optimized combustion phasing and shorter combustion duration. They also had a longer ignition delay period available for premixing, which led to near-zero soot emissions. The two fuels with high cetane number and high 90% distillation temperature produced significant soot emissions. The two fuels with high cetane number and high aromatics produced the highest brake specific NOx emissions, although the absolute values were below 0.1 g/kW-h. Brake specific HC and CO emissions were primarily a function of the combustion phasing, but the low cetane number fuels had slightly higher HC and lower CO emissions than the high cetane number fuels.

Fuel Property Effects on PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosmin E. Dumitrescu ◽  
W. Stuart Neill ◽  
Hongsheng Guo ◽  
Vahid Hosseini ◽  
Wallace L. Chippior
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Fuel Property ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Soot Emissions ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

An experimental study was performed to investigate fuel property effects on Premixed-Charge Compression Ignition (PCCI) combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. A matrix of research diesel fuels designed by the Coordinating Research Council, referred to as the Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE), was used. The fuel matrix design covers a wide range of cetane numbers (30 to 55), 90% distillation temperatures (270 to 340°C) and aromatics content (20 to 45%). The fuels were tested in a single-cylinder Caterpillar diesel engine equipped with a common-rail fuel injection system. The engine was operated at 900 rpm, a relative air/fuel ratio of 1.2 and 60% exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) for all fuels. The study was limited to a single fuel injection event starting between −30° and 0°CA with a rail pressure of 150 MPa. The brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) ranged from 3.2 to 3.6 bar depending on the fuel and fuel injection timing. The experimental results show that cetane number was the most important fuel property affecting PCCI combustion behavior. The low cetane number fuels had better BSFC due to more optimized combustion phasing and shorter combustion duration. They also had a longer ignition delay period available for premixing, which led to near-zero soot emissions. The two fuels with high cetane number and high 90% distillation temperature produced significant soot emissions when the start of combustion occurred before the end of fuel injection. The two fuels with high cetane number and high aromatics produced the highest brake specific NOx emissions, although the absolute values were below 0.1 g/kW-hr. Brake specific HC and CO emissions were primarily a function of the combustion phasing, but the low cetane number fuels had slightly higher HC and lower CO emissions than the high cetane number fuels.

A Study on Adaptability of the Engine Control Module of an Existing Heavy Duty Diesel Engine to Optimize the Engine Performance With F-T Diesel Fuel

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kandulapati ◽  
Chuen-Sen Lin ◽  
Dennis Witmer ◽  
Thomas Johnson ◽  
Jack Schmid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Engine ◽  
Diesel Fuel ◽  
Load Condition ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Synthetic Fuels ◽  
Control Module ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Synthetic fuels produced from non-petroleum based feedstocks can effectively replace the depleting petroleum based conventional fuels while significantly reducing the emissions. The zero sulfur content and the near zero percentage of aromatics in the synthetic fuels make them promising clean fuels to meet the upcoming emissions regulations. However due to their significantly different properties when compared to the conventional fuels; the existing engines must be tested extensively to study their performance with the new fuels. This paper reports a detailed in-cylinder pressure measurement based study made on adaptability of the engine control module (ECM) of a modern heavy duty diesel engine to optimize the engine performance with the F-T diesel fuel. During this study, the F-T and Conventional diesel fuels were tested at different loads and various injection timing changes made with respect to the manufacturer setting. Results from these tests showed that the ECM used significantly different injection timings for the two fuels in the process of optimizing the engine performance. For the same power output the ECM used a 2° advance in the injection timing with respect to the manufacturer setting at the full load and 1° retard at the no load condition. While the injection timings used by the ECM were same for both the fuels at the 50% load condition. However, a necessity for further changes in the control strategies used by the ECM were observed to get the expected advantages with the F-T fuels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document