scholarly journals A Novel Survey Tool to Assess Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows' Attitudes Regarding Acquiring Teaching Skills During Fellowship Training

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy B. Richards ◽  
Emer Kelly ◽  
Henry Fessler ◽  
David H. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Teaching Skills ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Attitudes Toward Teaching ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Attending Physicians

Abstract Background Important components of fellowship training include learning teaching skills and career development. Pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows' opinions of the importance of developing teaching skills and interest in careers in medical education have not been previously described, and there are no tools to assess interest in acquiring teaching skills. Objective We describe the development and initial psychometric validation of a survey tool to assess trainees' attitudes toward and interest in acquiring teaching skills. Methods A survey tool to assess attitudes toward teaching and medical education skills was designed and psychometrically characterized. We then anonymously surveyed fellows in 1 PCCM program to assess their perceptions of and attitudes regarding acquiring teaching skills. Results The survey tool demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. The survey showed that most fellows felt that acquiring teaching skills was “very important,” and nearly half reported being “interested” or “very interested” in pursuing careers as medical educators. However, fellows disagreed with the feedback they received from attending physicians with regard to their teaching abilities (10% disagreed with feedback at the beginning of the year, 36% disagreed at the end of the year; P  =  .03). Conclusions Our survey demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and performance characteristics in a single-site study of PCCM fellows during 1 academic year. Fellows are interested in improving their teaching skills but do not know how to become better teachers. Added research in multiple settings should explore the generalizability of our findings.

The Association of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Training Programs with Research Publication Productivity and Employment Outcomes of Their Graduates

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali Basu ◽  
Robin Horak ◽  
Murray M. Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Publication Productivity ◽  
Research Publication ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Publication Success ◽  
Fellowship Programs

AbstractOur objective was to associate characteristics of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship training programs with career outcomes of PCCM physicians, including research publication productivity and employment characteristics. This is a descriptive study using publicly available data from 2557 PCCM physicians from the National Provider Index registry. We analyzed data on a systematic sample of 690 PCCM physicians representing 62 fellowship programs. There was substantial diversity in the characteristics of fellowship training programs in terms of fellowship size, intensive care unit (ICU) bed numbers, age of program, location, research rank of affiliated medical school, and academic metrics based on publication productivity of their graduates standardized over time. The clinical and academic attributes of fellowship training programs were associated with publication success and characteristics of their graduates' employment hospital. Programs with greater publication rate per graduate had more ICU beds and were associated with higher ranked medical schools. At the physician level, training program attributes including larger size, older program, and higher academic metrics were associated with graduates with greater publication productivity. There were varied characteristics of current employment hospitals, with graduates from larger, more academic fellowship training programs more likely to work in larger pediatric intensive care units (24 [interquartile range, IQR: 16–35] vs. 19 [IQR: 12–24] beds; p < 0.001), freestanding children's hospitals (52.6 vs. 26.3%; p < 0.001), hospitals with fellowship programs (57.3 vs. 40.3%; p = 0.01), and higher affiliated medical school research ranks (35.5 [IQR: 14–72] vs. 62 [IQR: 32, unranked]; p < 0.001). Large programs with higher academic metrics train physicians with greater publication success (H index 3 [IQR: 1–7] vs. 2 [IQR: 0–6]; p < 0.001) and greater likelihood of working in large academic centers. These associations may guide prospective trainees as they choose training programs that may foster their career values.

scholarly journals Empathy Can Be Taught, and Patients Teach it Best

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 238212052110003
Author(s):  
Sudhagar Thangarasu ◽  
Gowri Renganathan ◽  
Piruthiviraj Natarajan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Role Modeling ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Mixed Messages ◽  
Attending Physicians ◽  
Medical Education Curriculum

Empathy toward patients is an essential skill for a physician to deliver the best care for any patient. Empathy also protects the physician from moral injury and decreases the chances for malpractice litigations. The current graduate medical education curriculum allows trainees to graduate without getting focused training to develop empathy as a core competency domain. The tools to measure empathy inherently lack validity. The accurate measure of the provider’s empathy comes from the patient’s perspectives of their experience and their feedback, which is rarely reaching the trainee. The hidden curriculum in residency programs gives mixed messages to trainees due to inadequate role modeling by attending physicians. This narrative style manuscript portrays a teachable moment at the bedside vividly. The teaching team together reflected upon the lack of empathy, took steps to resolve the issue. The attending demonstrated role modeling as an authentic and impactful technique to teach empathy. The conclusion includes a proposal to include the patient’s real-time feedback to trainees as an essential domain under Graduate Medical Education core competencies of professionalism and patient care.

scholarly journals Entrustable Professional Activities in Hematopathology Pathology Fellowship Training: Consensus Design and Proposal

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237428952199082
Author(s):  
Kristie White ◽  
Julianne Qualtieri ◽  
Elizabeth L. Courville ◽  
Rose C. Beck ◽  
Bachir Alobeid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Constructive Feedback ◽  
Delphi Approach

Hematopathology fellowship education has grown in complexity as patient-centered treatment plans have come to depend on integration of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and cytogenetic variables. This complexity is in competition with the need for timely hematopathology care with stewardship of patient, laboratory, and societal resources. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones provide a guidance document for hematopathology training, but fellows and their educators are in need of a simple framework that allows assessment and feedback of growth toward independent hematopathology practice. Entrustable professional activities provide one such framework, and herein, we provide proposed Hematopathology Fellowship Entrustable Professional Activities based on review of pertinent guidelines and literature, with multiple rounds of expert and stakeholder input utilizing a modified mini-Delphi approach. Ten core entrustable professional activities deemed essential for graduating hematopathology fellows were developed together with skills and knowledge statements, example scenarios, and corresponding Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones. Application of these entrustable professional activities in program design, fellow evaluation, and decisions regarding level of supervision is discussed with consideration of benefits and barriers to implementation. These entrustable professional activities may be used by hematopathology fellowship directors and faculty to provide fellows with timely constructive feedback, determine entrustment decisions, provide the Clinical Competency Committee with granular data to support Milestone evaluations, and provide insight into areas of potential improvement in fellowship training. Fellows will benefit from a clear roadmap to independent hematopathology practice with concrete and timely feedback.

Entrustable Professional Activities and Curricular Milestones for Fellowship Training in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 2290-2291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry E. Fessler ◽  
Doreen Addrizzo-Harris ◽  
James M. Beck ◽  
John D. Buckley ◽  
Stephen M. Pastores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Professional Activities

scholarly journals Residents and Medical Students Correctly Answer Clinical Questions More Often with Google and UpToDate than With PubMed or Ovid MEDLINE

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Theresa Arndt
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Correct Answer ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Search Tool ◽  
Clinical Questions ◽  
Attending Physicians

Objective – To determine which search tool (Google, UpToDate, PubMed or Ovid-MEDLINE) produces more accurate answers for residents, medical students, and attending physicians searching on clinical questions in anesthesiology and critical care. Searcher confidence in the answers and speed with which answers were found were also examined. Design – Randomized study without a control group. Setting – Large university medical center. Subjects –Subjects included 15 fourth year medical students (third and fourth year), 35 residents, and 4 attending physicians volunteered and completed the study. One additional attending withdrew halfway through the study. The authors were unsuccessful in recruiting an equal number of subjects from each group. Methods – A set of eight anesthesia and critical care questions was developed, based on their commonality and importance in clinical practice and their answerability. Four search tools were employed: Google, UpToDate, PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE. In part I, subjects were given a random set of four of the questions to answer with the search tool(s) of their choice, but could use only one search tool per question. In part II, several weeks later, the same subjects were randomly assigned a search tool with which to answer all 8 questions. The authors state that “for data analysis, PubMed was arbitrarily chosen to be the “reference standard.”” Statistical analysis was used to identify significant differences between PubMed and the other search tools. Main Results – Part I: Subjects choosing a search tool were more likely to find a correct answer with Google or UpToDate. There were no statistically significant differences in confidence with answers between any of the search tools and PubMed. Part II: Though subjects were assigned a search tool, some questions were repeated from part I. For repeated questions, Ovid users (compared to PubMed users) were significantly less likely to find the correct answer for repeated questions. Otherwise, there was no statistically significant difference in questions answered correctly. Confidence did not differ. When asked to answer new questions, subjects using Google and UpToDate were significantly more likely to find a correct answer than PubMed users. UpToDate users were more confident. There was no statistical difference in primary outcome (correct answer with high confidence) between Google, Ovid, and PubMed. Pooled data from parts I and II, removing repeated questions: Subjects using Google and UpToDate were more likely to find correct answers. Confidence was highest among UpToDate users. Average search time per question (limited to 5 minutes per question) in ascending order of time spent was: UpToDate, Google, PubMed, and Ovid. Conclusion – While the number of participants is small, the results suggest that the popular search engine Google and the commercially produced secondary online source UpToDate are more useful and efficient for finding answers to questions arising in anesthesiology and critical care practice than tools focused exclusively on indexing the primary literature.

The Adult Playfulness Scale: An Initial Assessment

1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Glynn ◽  
Jane Webster
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Psychological Traits ◽  
Psychological Constructs ◽  
Adult Playfulness ◽  
Functional Orientation ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Gender

We develop a theory-based measure of adults' playfulness, the Adult Playfulness Scale. Five studies, conducted in laboratory and field sites with over 300 individuals, examine the psychometric properties and correlates of playfulness. As expected, playfulness relates to a set of psychological traits, including cognitive spontaneity and creativity, as well as to functional orientation and rank. No definitive relationships were found, however, between adults' playfulness and gender or age, but playfulness related positively to work outcomes, including task evaluations, perceptions, involvement, and performance, and provided more predictive efficacy than other psychological constructs studied here. Finally, the Adult Playfulness Scale demonstrates good reliability and shows promise for the study of playfulness in the workplace.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document