High School Teachers as Negotiators Between Curriculum Intentions and Enactment: The Dynamics of Mathematics Curriculum Development

2011 ◽  
pp. 191-209
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Dan Cheng

In this paper, the writer will use a literature analysis approach to explore the issue of teacher autonomy and professionalism in both centralized and decentralized curriculum models. Through literature analysis, the paper argues that centralized and decentralized curricula each have their own positive and negative effects on teachers' autonomy and professional development. Under the current curriculum model in China, teachers' autonomy and professionalism in curriculum development are both enhanced and limited to some extent. Based on the analysis of the literature, this paper will propose recommendations for enhancing Chinese high school teachers' autonomy and professionalism in curriculum development.


2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 728

The Historical Modules Project, a part of the Institute in the History of Mathematics and Its Use in Teaching (IHMT), is sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America (MAA) and supported by the National Science Foundation. In the project, eighteen high school teachers and six college teachers with experience in the history of mathematics have been working in six teams to develop modules for various topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. These modules are intended to show teachers how to use the history of mathematics in teaching mathematics.


2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 416-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Hung Liu

The merits of incorporating history into mathematics education have received considerable attention and have been discussed for decades. Still, before taking as dogma that history must be incorporated in mathematics, an obvious question is, Why should the history of mathematics have a place in school mathematics? Answering this question is difficult, since the answer is subject to one's personal definition of teaching and is also bound up with one's view of mathematics. Fauvel's (1991) list of fifteen reasons for including the history of mathematics in the mathematics curriculum includes cognitive, affective, and sociocultural aspects. My purpose in this article is not to provide complete and satisfactory answers but rather, on the basis of theoretical arguments and empirical evidence, to attempt to pinpoint worthwhile considerations to help high school teachers think about what history really can do for the curriculum and for their teaching.


1966 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-334
Author(s):  
James H. Zant

The significant thing about Dr. Kline's paper is the question it raises in the mind of the reader. Is Dr. Kline finally coining around to the point of proposing a new mathematics curriculum for the high school and doing something about it? He will certainly not make the mistake, made by many of us in the past ten years, of calling it “modern mathematics.” The idea for the first-year algebra is here; and, though he says, “The content … is the traditional one,” this is not entirely true; certainly its organization is not traditional. If he would now find what mathematics is being taught in grades 1-8 and obtain the help of some good high school teachers who know how students of this age level learn, he could write a book, and then all of us could find out what he is talking about.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document