British Ability Scales (Bas) Word Reading Test

Author(s):  
John R. Beech ◽  
Chris Singleton
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Osmon ◽  
Elizabeth Plambeck ◽  
Liesa Klein ◽  
Quintino Mano

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Włodzimierz Płotek ◽  
Marcin Cybulski ◽  
Marta Łockiewicz ◽  
Marta Bogdanowicz ◽  
Anna Kluzik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Chan ◽  
Suzanne Adlof ◽  
Dawna Duff ◽  
Alexis Mitchell ◽  
Maalavika Ragunathan ◽  
...  

Purpose: To examine the relationship between parent concerns about children’s oral language, reading, and related skills and their children’s performance on standardized assessments of language and reading, with a particular focus on whether those relationships differed between children recruited for in-school versus remote participation. Methods: This study used data from a larger, longitudinal project focused on children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD) and/or dyslexia. The “in-school” sample (n = 133) completed assessments in-person before the COVID-19 school closures, and the “remote” sample (n = 84) recruited via advertisements completed all assessments online. Parents completed a checklist of concerns regarding language and literacy development, attention and executive functions. All children completed norm-referenced assessments of language and reading.Results: The two recruitment strategies yielded samples that differed in racial diversity (higher in the in-school sample), caregiver education levels and financial resources (higher in the remote sample), and word reading test scores (higher in the remote sample). Parents in both samples reported higher levels of concerns about literacy skills than oral language skills, and the correlation between parent concerns about literacy and children’s word reading test scores was stronger than the correlation between parent concerns about oral language and children’s language test scores. We did not find higher level of concerns or a higher correlation between concerns and reading and language performance in the remote sample than the in-school sample.Conclusions: Researchers should be aware of the impact of different recruitment strategies on sample attainment. Referral models that rely on parent and teacher concerns about oral language to prompt a language evaluation may contribute to low rates of identification of children who meet criteria for DLD. Future research can consider parent concerns about literacy, attention, and executive functions as indicators of a need for language evaluation, especially considering the high comorbidity between language and other developmental disorders.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Motohiro Isaki ◽  
Tadahiro Kanazawa ◽  
Toshihiko Hinobayashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Kitajima

Previous studies have examined that the reading abilities of Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) children are poorer than those of Normal Birth Weight (NBW) children. However, little is known about the cognitive functions that have been used to explain the reading problems in VLBW children. This study investigated that the effects of attention function on reading abilities in VLBW children. 23 VLBW children (mean age 9.1 years old) and 23 NBW children (mean age 9.2 years old) completed a reading test (containing word reading and non-word reading tasks), attention tasks, a phonological task and a naming task. The group differences were significant for the non-word reading task and attention tasks. Moreover, there were significant correlations between scores on the reading test and those on attention tasks. Multiple stepwise regression analysis suggested the reading scores were influenced by attention. These results of the present study suggest that attentional dyslexia is a characteristic of reading among VLBW children.


1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim H. J. Van Bon ◽  
Judith M. L. Van Der Pijl

ABSTRACTThis Study investigated whether the pseudoword repetition difference between poor and normal readers could be explained by differences in memory for verbal materials or in familiarity with the composition of verbal materials. Dutch second graders and poor readers scoring in the same range on a word-reading test repeated pseudowords that varied in length and wordlikeness. The pseudoword repetition deficit of poor readers reported in the literature was replicated. Although the repetition scores were influenced by pseudoword length and wordlikeness, no interaction with reader group was found, thus indicating that neither variable represented a causal factor in the poor readers' repetition deficit. Statistical correction for reader group differences on a phoneme detection task and an auditory discrimination task made the pseudoword repetition difference disappear. We conclude that the basic problem is unlikely to be with subvocal rehearsal, and that the cause of the repetition deficit is already operative in early, perceptual stages of processing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-634
Author(s):  
Yujeong Park ◽  
Melissa Martin ◽  
R. Steve McCallum ◽  
Sherry M. Bell

To preliminarily validate the Monitoring Instructional Responsiveness−Reading (MIR-R) for use in low-income settings, data were collected from 147 students from first through fifth grades who were primarily from low-income families. Data from three MIR-R components (Total Words Read, Ideas Attempted, Ideas Correct) and three related dependent measures (i.e., Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency [TOSCRF], Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency [TOSWRF], and Gray Silent Reading Test [GSRT]) were obtained across two time points (i.e., Time 1 and Time 2) in the same setting to address test–retest reliability and concurrent validity. Results showed (a) stability of the three MIR-R components scores over time, (b) strong correlations ( p < .05) between the MIR-R Total Words Read and Ideas Attempted and TOSWRF and TOSCRF, and (c) strong associations between MIR-R Ideas Correct and TOSCRF, TOSWRF, and GSRT in Time 1 and Time 2. Because these results showed strong associations between MIR-R and established measures of reading and because MIR-R can be administered in only 3 min, it may provide an efficient operationalization of student progress. Additional implications were discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document