Bilingualism and Jury Service

2017 ◽  
pp. 207-211
Keyword(s):  
Jury Service

scholarly journals “The Terror of their Lives”: Irish Jurors' Experiences

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Níamh Howlin
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Social Economic ◽  
Poor State ◽  
Public Meetings ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Jury Service ◽  
The World ◽  
Jury System

A commentator noted in 1881 that Irishmen regarded jury service as “the greatest burden that can be inflicted upon them … they would be delighted if trial by jury was suspended tomorrow.” He later added, “[o]f course an enormous outcry would be raised about it in the national press, and in public meetings; but jurors … would give anything in the world not to serve … because it is the terror of their lives.” Much has been written about the poor state of the nineteenth-century Irish jury system, and it is certainly true that for various social, economic and political reasons, in comparison with that in England, the Irish system appears to have operated in a way that fell somewhat short of ideal. This article seeks to provide an understanding of the realities facing the jurors themselves, and will examine their experiences of the justice system before, during, and after the trial.

scholarly journals A Legal History of the New Zealand Jury Service - Introduction, Evolution, and Equality?

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Michèle Powles
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal History ◽  
Race And Gender ◽  
Jury Service ◽  
History Of ◽  
Jury System ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Service Introduction

This article traces the development of the New Zealand jury system. Most noteworthy in thisdevelopment has been the lack of controversy the system has created. At the end of the nineteenth century, however, the pursuit of equality in the legal system generally led to debate and reform of juries in relation to representation, race and gender.

10. The jury

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Wilson ◽  
Helen Rutherford ◽  
Tony Storey ◽  
Natalie Wortley
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Ethnic Composition ◽  
Jury Trial ◽  
Criminal Trials ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Jury Deliberations ◽  
Jury Trials ◽  
Jury Service ◽  
The Impact

The jury consists of twelve, randomly-selected members of the public, who decide guilt or innocence in the most serious criminal trials in the Crown Court. This ensures that the general public are represented in the criminal justice system. This chapter explains the rules on eligibility for, and disqualification or excusal from, jury service. It considers issues such as the power of the jury to acquit in defiance of the evidence (‘jury equity’); the confidentiality of jury deliberations and the implications of that for appeals; the ethnic composition of a jury; whether juries should be excluded from certain trials such as those involving serious fraud or where there is evidence of jury ‘tampering’; whether the accused should be able to ‘waive’ their right to jury trial; and the impact of social media on jury trials. It concludes by examining the relative advantages and disadvantages of jury trials.

Jury service and ex-psychiatric patients

1991 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-290
Author(s):  
Tony Maden
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Jury Service ◽  
Psychological Pressure ◽  
Special Hospitals

The Matthew Trust has argued that ex-offenders and ex-patients of the special hospitals should not be allowed to do jury service until they have had at least ten years without offending or have been out of an institution for at least ten years. Mr Peter Thompson, Director of the Matthew Trust, argues that this period is necessary, in order to overcome the effects of institutionalisation and adjust to life in the community. The ex-offender or patient is held to be under such psychological pressure during this ten years, largely as a result of society's prejudices, that he would be unable to perform objectively on a jury.

The Exclusion of the Clergy from Criminal Trial Juries: An Historical Perspective

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (24) ◽  
pp. 151-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Pattenden
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ages ◽  
Historical Perspective ◽  
Criminal Trial ◽  
Religious Community ◽  
Religious Denomination ◽  
Criminal Trials ◽  
Religious Order ◽  
Official Report ◽  
Jury Service ◽  
History Of

Schedule 1 to the Juries Act 1974 provides that ‘[a] man in holy orders; a regular minister of any religious denomination [and] [a] vowed member of any religious order living in a monastery, convent or other religious community’ is ineligible to serve on a criminal (and also a civil) jury. This has been the law since 1972. For the remainder of this century members of the clergy have been eligible, but not compellable, jurors. In practice they did not serve. The change effected in 1972 is a reversion to the position which probably prevailed in the Middle Ages. Aside from the occasional official report, the liability of religious functionaries to serve on juries in criminal trials has been rarely written about. The last time it happened was in 1882. The object of this article is to fill the lacuna by tracing the history of the clergy's ineligibility for jury service in criminal trials and the reasons for it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document