Surveillance theory meets participatory theory

Author(s):  
Kirstie Ball ◽  
Tjerk Timan ◽  
William Webster
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Frank Fischer

This final chapter explores ideas previously taken up and relates them to political theory, democratic deliberative politics in particular. Up to this point, these ideas have been presented as theoretical contributions to both participatory governance and the relocalization movement. The discussion here seeks to extend the theoretical perspective more specifically to a number of important but relatively neglected traditions in democratic political theory, especially as they relate to ideas taken from the writings of Bookchin and Sale. This involves the theories of associative democracy, insurgent democratic politics, and participatory or democratic expertise. These theoretical orientations are provided as steps in search of a broader environmental political theory that can address the democratic struggles that are anticipated during the socio-ecological climate crisis ahead.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Seward ◽  
Charlotte Hanlon ◽  
Saba Hinrichs ◽  
Crick Lund ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
...  

Implementation research is a multidisciplinary field that addresses the complex phenomenon of how context influences our ability to deliver evidence-informed healthcare. There is increasing realisation of the importance of applying robust implementation research to scale-up lifesaving interventions that meet health-related sustainable development goals. However, the lack of high-quality implementation research is impeding our ability to meet these targets. In this paper we provide guidance to assist researchers to understand and conceptualise how implementation research methods can be used to deliver high-quality evidence-informed practice at scale. There are four phases to implementation research: pre-implementation, piloting, implementation and evaluation, and post-implementation and scale-up phases. Implementation science and theory-driven approaches can be used to design, pilot, implement and evaluate implementation programmes. Important components of implementation research such as stakeholder engagement can be applied to embed the research into existing health systems therefore ensure applicability in the ‘real world’. Implementation research also needs to be participatory; co-designed by all stakeholders who can influence implementation efforts. Although there is increasing interest in applying robust methodology to understand how and why implementation programmes work in real-world settings, global health actors still tend to favour evaluations conducted in controlled environments. Perhaps this is due to implementation research being a multidisciplinary field requiring expertise from a range of specialist disciplines such as implementation science and social science. To help translate some of the ambiguity surrounding the methodologies applied to implementation research, we draw on our expertise from a range of disciplines including global health, social science, policy, implementation science, epidemiology, and statistics to offer an overview of how to conduct participatory, theory-driven implementation research to design and test the effectiveness of delivering high-quality evidence-informed interventions at scale.


Author(s):  
Robert Garner

This chapter examines the claim that democracy is the ideal form of political obligation. It first traces the historical evolution of the term ‘democracy’ before discussing the debate between advocates of the protective theory and the participatory theory of democracy, asking whether it is possible to reconcile elitism with democracy and whether participatory democracy is politically realistic. It then describes the new directions that democratic theory has taken in recent years, focusing on four theories: associative democracy, cosmopolitan democracy, deliberative democracy, and ecological democracy. It also explains why democracy is viewed as the major grounding for political obligation, with emphasis on the problem of majority rule and what to do with the minority consequences of majoritarianism.


This article outlines the mystical path followed by Jungian analyst and author Marion Woodman. It unpacks the mystical aspects of Jungian psychology and uses Woodman’s life as a lens to view how the practice of mysticism can operate within alternative psycho-religious belief systems. Woodman deeply embraces mysticism as a transformative, feminist practice by focusing her work on healing the psycho-spiritual effects of patriarchy and the associated repression of women and the body. This paper also discusses how Woodman’s mystical revelations have begun to affect the epistemological foundation of Jungian psychology in a way that echoes the embodied and enactive perspective of participatory theory.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Alexander Winsley

<p>This paper explores the balancing act between freedom of expression and hate speech. It takes its cue from a recent dialogue between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron concerning democratic legitimacy. This dialogue forms the conceptual starting point for the paper, and a detailed analysis of democratic principles will follow. Robert Post’s participatory theory of democracy is critiqued, and his recent conversion to democratic relativism is analysed. The operation of hate speech laws in Canada and New Zealand will both be assessed in order to see how both of these countries treat the issue of democratic legitimacy.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Alexander Winsley

<p>This paper explores the balancing act between freedom of expression and hate speech. It takes its cue from a recent dialogue between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron concerning democratic legitimacy. This dialogue forms the conceptual starting point for the paper, and a detailed analysis of democratic principles will follow. Robert Post’s participatory theory of democracy is critiqued, and his recent conversion to democratic relativism is analysed. The operation of hate speech laws in Canada and New Zealand will both be assessed in order to see how both of these countries treat the issue of democratic legitimacy.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document