Economic Analysis of a Theoretical Integrated Livestock-Shrimp Farming System

2020 ◽  
pp. 123-130
Author(s):  
Cheng-Sheng Lee ◽  
Yung C. Shang
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Shrimp Farming

Economic Analysis of Including an Annual Forage in a Corn-Soybean Farming System

jpa ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent D. Olson ◽  
Neal P. Martin ◽  
Dale R. Hicks ◽  
Michael A. Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Farming System

Occurrence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in some shrimp farms of Bangladesh

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana Ashrafi Neela ◽  
Md Atiquer Rahman ◽  
MST Nasrin Akhter Banu ◽  
M Habibur Rahman ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brackish Water ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Shrimp Farming ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Pseudomonas Sp ◽  
Bacillus Sp ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Acinetobacter Sp ◽  
Shrimp Farms

Tetracycline (TC) and ampicillin (AMP) resistant bacteria were identified from both fresh and brackish water shrimp farming system, in Bangladesh. Among 78 isolates from freshwater samples, 14.10, 17.95 and 23.8% were found resistant to TC, AMP and TC plus AMP, respectively. On the other hand, isolates from the brackish water samples, the percentages of TC, AMP and TC plus AMP resistant isolates were 10.25, 12.82 and 15.38, respectively. In freshwater samples, the highest percentage of resistant bacteria was Bacillus sp. (38.9), Pseudomonas sp. (22.2), Staphylococcus sp. (16.7), Acinetobacter sp. (11.1), Brevibacillus sp. (5.5) and Enterobacter sp. (5.5). While in brackish water samples dominant resistant bacteria was Bacillus sp. (50) followed by Pseudomonas sp. (16.7), Acinetobacter sp. (16.7), Enterobacter sp. (8.3) and Microvirgula sp. (8.3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v41i2.13449 Bangladesh J. Bot. 41(2): 197-200, 2012 (December)

scholarly journals Economic Analysis of Integrated Farming Systems in Uttar Kannada District of Karnataka

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Shruthi ◽  
N.R. Mamle Desai
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Farming Systems ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Personal Interview ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Integrated Farming ◽  
Integrated Farming Systems

Background: The present study was conducted in Uttar Kannada district of Karnataka as a project on integrated farming systems was implemented in this district by University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during the year 2013-15. It was considered for study in master’s research. Methods: Under the study three taluks viz., Sirsi, Mundagod and Bhatkala were selected with an overall objective of identifying and analyzing and the economics of integrated farming systems. The relevant data collected from primary sources through personal interview method were analyzed by tabular and production function techniques. Four main integrated farming systems followed by majority of the farmers in the study area are selected for study, viz., Integrated Farming System-I,II,III,IV. Result: The study revealed that the total cost under Integrated Farming Systems-III was highest with Rs. 129023, while it was Rs. 115388, Rs.115266 and Rs. 97434 respectively in Integrated Farming Systems-I,II and IV. net farm returns was highest under Integrated Farming Systems-I which was Rs. 86351. In all the different integrated farming systems, the labour and seed cost had significant influence on gross returns. The seed and feed were underutilized, fertilizer, FYM and land were over utilized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document