Social protection for workers outside the traditional employment contract – a Swedish example

Author(s):  
Annamaria Johansson Westregård
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-39
Author(s):  
Isabela Fadul de Oliveira

RESUMO:Este texto tem como objetivo refletir sobre o processo recente de regulamentação das relações de trabalho terceirizado no Brasil. Para tanto, partimos de uma breve apresentação sobre a forma como foi organizado o sistema de regulamentação e proteção social do trabalho no país, identificando o contrato individual de emprego como um dos seus eixos estruturantes. Em seguida, localizamos o início do debate jurídico sobre a terceirização nos anos 1990 e destacamos os aspectos principais da disputa em torno da sua regulamentação. Ao final, examinamos as mudanças introduzidas pelas Leis 13.429/2017 e 13.467/2017 no ordenamento jurídico trabalhista, procurando demonstrar como seu conteúdo normativo põe em xeque a estrutura do Direito do Trabalho no país e promove as condições para a livre exploração do trabalho terceirizado, respondendo aos anseios da classe patronal e resultando em perda de direitos para a classe trabalhadora. ABSTRACT:This text aims to reflect about the recent process of regulation of outsourced work relationships in Brazil. Therefore, we start with a brief presentation about how the system of regulation and social protection of work in the country was organized, identifying the individual employment contract as one of its structuring axes. Next, we locate the beginning of the legal debate about the outsourcing in the 1990s and highlight the main aspects of the dispute over its regulation. In the end, we examine the changes introduced by Laws 13,429 / 2017 and 13,467 / 2017 in the labor legal system, trying to demonstrate how its normative content puts the structure of Labor Law in the country in check and promotes the conditions for the free exploitation of outsourced work, responding to the wishes of the employers’ class and resulting in loss of rights for the working class. 


Author(s):  
Marvin Reuter ◽  
Morten Wahrendorf ◽  
Cristina Di Tecco ◽  
Tahira M. Probst ◽  
Sascha Ruhle ◽  
...  

European employees are increasingly likely to work in cases of illness (sickness presenteeism, SP). Past studies found inconsistent evidence for the assumption that temporary workers decide to avoid taking sick leave due to job insecurity. A new measure to identify decision-based determinants of SP is presenteeism propensity (PP), which is the number of days worked while ill in relation to the sum of days worked while ill and days taken sickness absence. We investigated the link between employment contract and PP using cross-sectional data from 20,240 employees participating in the 2015 European Working Conditions Survey. Workers were grouped by type and duration of employment contract. The link between contract and PP was estimated using a multilevel Poisson model adjusted for socio-demographical, occupational and health-related covariates. We found that European employees worked 39% of the days they were ill. In contrast to previous studies, temporary workers were significantly more likely to decide for presenteeism than permanent workers were, especially when the contract was limited to less than 1 year. Controlling for perceived job insecurity did just marginally attenuate this association. Presenteeism was also more common among young and middle-aged workers; however, we did not find a significant interaction between contract and age affecting presenteeism. In conclusion, the employment contract is an important determinant of presenteeism. Our results give reason to believe that temporary workers show increased attendance behavior independent of job insecurity, because they are less likely to have access to social protection in case of illness.


The article considers the state policy of social protection of the population in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Methods of legal regulation of social security law. The system of social security law is analyzed. The history of formation and development of social security in the Republic of Uzbekistan is studied. Attention is paid to the rights of social security during the period of quarantine from a pandemic, and international legislation and experience are comparatively analyzed . The article deals with themain characteristics of the legal regulation of remote workers ' labor; theconcept and features of remote laboras a subject of labor law. The authors analyzed therelationship of an employment contract with a remote employee with other labor contracts. Legal acts in the field of regulating the work of remote workersin the context of a pandemic have been studied. Features of concluding an employment contract with a remote employee. Electronic interaction during the pandemic period, whichis under the control of the employer; - interaction between the employer and the employee is carried outusing public information and telecommunications networks.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.38) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Nikolaevich Bobkov ◽  
Yuri Gennadievich Odegov ◽  
Valentina Vasilievna Pavlova

This paper provides a characterization of the essence of precarious employment. The author describes some of the key stages in the transformation of the employment sector. The paper shares the findings from a sociological study into precarious employment in a representative group. The author has explored some of the key parameters for the group and has fine-tuned a set of indicators of precarious employment and their quantitative values which identify particular aspects of precarious employment (Note 1), namely with a focus on: assessments of the level of being protected by the employment contract (employee evaluations of the terms and conditions of the employment contract and assessments of the extent to which the employer abides by them; assessments of the likelihood of being laid off; assessments of one’s willingness to look for another job and the reasons behind it); assessments of the accessibility of mechanisms of social protection for employees; self-assessments of material well-being; work conditions (e.g., length of the work week, half-time work, and availability and duration of work in an additional place); etc. The author has identified a total of 5 profiles for present-day employment in Russia, which are characterized by an increase in signs of precarious employment, and provides a comparative characterization thereof.   


Author(s):  
Tatyana A. Zykina ◽  

The article deals with the introduction of digital technologies in the sphere of labor regu-lation, under which labor law, in order to remain an effective regulator, is trying to be modi-fied, introducing new types of objects (the Internet, digital platforms) and subjects (artificial intelligence, virtual personality) into the structure of legal relations. At the same time, the content of legal relations also changes. The author supports the po-sition of those researchers who propose to include digital legal relations into a separate group. Among the digital legal relations, it is proposed to isolate digital labor relations. Moreover, it is argued that in the sphere of labor there may be two types of digital legal relations, de-pending on the volume of use of digitalization tools. In the first case, digitalization only com-plements the classical labor relations, for example, through the use of electronic labor books or an electronic digital signature; in the second case, digitalization penetrates deeper, and the interaction of the parties is carried out at a distance, without physical contact, which is re-placed by digital technologies. The author proposes to divide digital labor relations into two groups, depending on the period of employment of the parties to the employment contract in the virtual environment. The first group includes digital labor relations related to the use of exclusively remote labor. The second group of digital labor relations involves the alternation of work in the office with a remote work. Remote digital labor relations, regardless of the group, have many differences from usual labor relations. The peculiarities of such work affect the procedure for concluding employ-ment contracts, which implies, in particular, the exchange of electronic documents between the employee and the employer when hiring. The existence of digital labor relations is caused by the specifics that are manifested in their implementation in a special virtual environment, on digital platforms, without real (or limited) communication of the parties to the legal labor relationship. Such specificity requires of employees and employers to have information knowledge and skills in addition to their professional ones, as well as to ensure their safe Internet cooperation and the exercise of digital rights. It is noted that work in the virtual space has led to a blurring of the criteria between em-ployment and self-employment. The difference exists in the field of social protection: it is provided if work is carried out on the basis of an employment contract, if not, there is no pro-tection at all. But the very process of work, freedom in choosing periods of work and rest, focus on the result, the ability to use any territory as a platform for the performance of their duties - makes work for hire and work for oneself very similar phenomena. In a democratic state, it is necessary to expand the scope of labor regulation to include the regulation of the work of the self-employed.


Work ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-260
Author(s):  
Emile Tompa ◽  
Heather Scott-Marshall ◽  
Miao Fang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document