Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted and Transsternal Thymectomy

Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is a minimally invasive technique that has been used in thymectomy operations in recent years. Minimally invasive surgical techniques offer less postoperative pain, a shorter length of hospital stay, and faster recovery compared to conventional surgical techniques. In our study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of robotic and transsternal thymectomies by analyzing the operative and postoperative data of these two approaches. Methods: Twelve robotic thymectomy patients and 16 transsternal thymectomy patients who were operated on in our clinic in 2018 were included in the study. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time (p=0.231). The median chest tube duration was 1.5 [range, 1-2] days in robotic thymectomy and 2.5 [range, 1-3.75] days in transsternal thymectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.082). The amount of chest tube drainage was significantly lower in the robotic thymectomy group (p=0.006). The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in robotic thymectomy patients (p<0.001). Conclusion: The amount of chest tube drainage was lower and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic surgery compared to the transsternal approach. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of operative time. Within today's minimally invasive surgical techniques, robotic thymectomy can be considered a practical, comfortable, and safe technique with better early postoperative outcomes. Keywords: Robot-Assisted Thymectomy, Thymectomy, Transsternal Thymectomy

Download Full-text

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000506716 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Zhenhua Gu ◽

Yucheng Yang ◽

Rui Ding ◽

Meili Wang ◽

Jianming Pu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽

Kidney Stones ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽

Alternative Approach ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Advances in micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for kidney stones have made it an alternative approach to the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) approach. Nevertheless, the superiority of micro-PCNL over RIRS is still under debate. The results are controversial. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical results in patients presenting with kidney stones treated with micro-PCNL or RIRS. Methods: A literature search was done for electronic databases to identify researches that compared micro-PCNL and RIRS till December 2019. The clinical outcome included complications, stone-free rates (SFRs), hemoglobin reduction, length of hospital stay, and operative time. Results: Five articles were included in our study. The pooled results revealed no statistical difference in the rate of complications (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.57–1.74, p = 0.99), length of hospital stay (MD = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.82 to 0.24, p = 0.28), and operative time (MD = −6.63, 95% CI = −27.34 to 14.08, p = 0.53) between the 2 groups. However, significant difference was present in hemoglobin reduction (MD = −0.43, 95% CI = −0.55 to 0.30, p < 0.001) and the SFRs (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.98, p = 0.04) when comparing RIRS with micro-PCNL. Conclusions: Compared with micro-PCNL to treat kidney stones, RIRS is associated with better stone clearance and bearing higher hemoglobin loss. As the advantages of both technologies have been shown in some fields, the continuation of well-designed clinical trials may be necessary.

Download Full-text

Implementation and Effectiveness of Early Chest Tube Removal during an Enhanced Recovery Programme after Oesophago-gastrectomy

Journal of Nepal Medical Association ◽

10.31729/jnma.2699 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 53 (197) ◽

pp. 24-27 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Rajeev Bhandari ◽

You Yong-hao

Keyword(s):

Pleural Effusion ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Chest Tube ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Task Force ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Control Group ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Chest Tube Removal

Introduction: Oesophageal resection were notoriously complicated and produces a cohort of patients prone to postoperative complications and here we would like to focus on the implementation and effectiveness of early chest tube removal in ERAS after oesophago-gastrectomy considering the various aspect like pleural effusion and reducing the length of hospital stay which ultimately lead to reducing the economic burden on patient.Methods: An ERAS programme was devised and implemented with the support of a dedicated in-hospital task-force. The patients underwent esophago-gastrectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the ERAS group and the control group (non-ERAS). The ERAS group was treated with early removal of the chest tube after surgery, and the control group was treated with traditional way and outcomes were compared between them.Results: The length of hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group（p<0.05. However, there was no statistical significant difference in the incidences of pleural effusion between the two groups（p＞0.05).Conclusions: The introduction of early chest tube removal as an ERAS programme after oesophago-gastrectomy would not increase the risk of pleural effusion and would not increase the total length of stay and cost of hospitalisation without jeopardising patient safety or clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Delayed appendicectomy in patients with non-perforated acute appendicitis

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173415 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (8) ◽

pp. 2766

Author(s):

Anandaravi B. N. ◽

Krishna S. R. ◽

Pradeep Kumar H. D. ◽

Mayank Garg

Keyword(s):

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Readmission Rate ◽

Operative Time ◽

Perforated Appendicitis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Perforation Rate ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Emergency Group ◽

Delayed Group

Background: Appendicitis remains one of the most common diseases encountered by the surgeon in practice. Appendicectomy is the most common urgent or emergency general surgical operation performed. Emergency appendicectomy is believed to be the standard treatment protocol for patients with acute appendicitis. This study was conducted to verify whether acute non-perforated appendicitis requires immediate surgery or can be delayed to be taken up on elective basis.Methods: This is a retrospective study of all the cases undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis over the period of January 2016 to December 2016 in K. R. hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. The cases were divided into two comparison groups: emergency group (operated within 12 hours of admission) and delayed group (operated between 12-72 hours). Parameters like age, sex, duration of symptoms, total leucocytes count, temperature, haemoglobin, radiological investigations, operative procedure, operative time, length of hospital stay, length of post-operative stay were collected and the end points for comparison were: Operative time, perforation rate, post-operative complication, length of hospital stay, readmission rate. Cases of perforated appendicitis in preoperative diagnosis, interval appendicectomy and appendicectomy done in association with other abdominal conditions were excluded from the study.Results: During this one-year period 283 patients have undergone appendicectomy. Out of this 189 (66.8%) patients have undergone surgery within 12 hours of admission and 94 (33.2%) have undergone surgery between 12 to 72 hours of admission. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, per operative perforation rate, post-operative complication rate, readmission rate. Length of the hospital stay was greater in delayed group as compared to emergency group. But there was no significant difference between the post-operative length of hospital stay.Conclusions: Acute appendicitis can be treated surgically in a delayed elective basis without increasing morbidity.

Download Full-text

Defining the Pros and Cons of Open, Conventional Laparoscopy, and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in a Developing Nation

Advances in Urology ◽

10.1155/2014/850156 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Mrinal Pahwa ◽

Archna R. Pahwa ◽

Mohit Girotra ◽

Rtika Ryfka Abrahm ◽

Sachin Kathuria ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Time ◽

Conventional Laparoscopy ◽

Drain Removal ◽

Robotic Pyeloplasty ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Pros And Cons ◽

Open Pyeloplasty ◽

Complications Rate

Introduction. Congenital pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is one of the most common causes of hydronephrosis. Historically, open dismembered pyeloplasty has been considered the gold standard intervention for correcting PUJO. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of three different approaches, namely, open, conventional laparoscopy, and robotic pyeloplasty.Material and Methods. 60 patients underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty (30 conventional laparoscopies and 30 robotics) for congenital PUJO at a tertiary health center in India. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed. The data of these patients were retrospectively compared with another cohort of 30 patients who had undergone open pyeloplasty.Results. There was significant difference in operative time, time to drain removal, hospital stay, pain score, and complications rate between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty (P<0.05). SFI was considerably lesser in robotic as compared to conventional laparoscopy. The success rate in OP, CLP, and RP was 93.33, 96.67, and 96.67%.Conclusion. Robotic pyeloplasty is safe, effective, and feasible. It is associated with significantly lesser operative time, lesser blood loss, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer complications. It is also associated with considerably lesser surgeon fatigue as compared to conventional laparoscopy pyeloplasty.

Download Full-text

The Safety of Selective Use of Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Sigmoid and Rectal Resections—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm7110392 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (11) ◽

pp. 392 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michał Nowakowski ◽

Piotr Małczak ◽

Magdalena Mizera ◽

Mateusz Rubinkiewicz ◽

Anna Lasek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Lymph Nodes ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Splenic Flexure ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Splenic Flexure Mobilization

Background: According to traditional textbooks on surgery, splenic flexure mobilization is suggested as a mandatory part of open rectal resection. However, its use in minimally invasive access seems to be limited. This stage of the procedure is considered difficult in the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature on flexure mobilization and perform meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Embase and Scopus databases to identify all eligible studies that compared patients undergoing rectal or sigmoid resection with or without splenic flexure mobilization. Inclusion criteria: (1) comparison of groups of patients with and without mobilization and (2) reports on overall morbidity, anastomotic leakage, operative time, length of specimen, number of harvested lymph nodes, or length of hospital stay. The outcomes of interest were: operative time, conversion rate, number of lymph nodes harvested, overall morbidity, mortality, leakage rate, reoperation rate, and length of stay. Results: Initial search yielded 2282 studies. In the end, we included 10 studies in the meta-analysis. Splenic flexure is associated with longer operative time (95% confidence interval (CI) 23.61–41.25; p < 0.001) and higher rate of anastomotic leakage (risk ratios (RR): 1.02; 95% CI 1.10–3.35; p = 0.02), however the length of hospital stay is shorter by 0.42 days. There were no differences in remaining outcomes. Conclusions: Not mobilizing the splenic flexure results in a significantly shorter operative time and a longer length of stay. Further research is required to establish whether flexure mobilization is required in minimally invasive surgery.

Download Full-text

Peri-Operative Outcomes after Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy by Using an Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology (Caiman®): A Prospective, Comparative, and Multi-Institutional Study

Current Urology ◽

10.1159/000489421 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 64-69 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Marco Borghesi ◽

Riccardo Schiavina ◽

Alessandro Antonelli ◽

Carlo Buizza ◽

Antonio Celia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Radical Cystectomy ◽

Operative Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Robot Assisted ◽

Operative Outcomes ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Significant Difference

Objective: To report and compare the peri-operative outcomes of patients undergoing open (ORC) and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer performed with a radiofrequency seal and cut device (Caiman®). Materials and Methods: Data of patients undergoing ORC or RARC between January 2015 and March 2016 at 6 Italian institutions were prospectively recorded and analyzed. Thirty-and 90-day complications were stratified according to the Martin's criteria and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Data on operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, complications, and length of stay were evaluated and compared between the ORC and RARC groups. Results: Thirty-three (66%) and 17 (34%) patients were treated with ORC and RARC, respectively. The median age was 72 (64-78) years. Overall operative time was longer in RARC compared to ORC (389 ± 80.1 vs. 242 ± 62.2 min, p < 0.001), while the estimated blood loss during cystectomy was higher after ORC (370 ± 126.8 vs. 243.3 ± 201.6 ml, p = 0.03). The transfusion rate was significantly higher in the ORC compared to RARC (24.2 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.04). Eight (19%) and 7 (16.7%) patients experienced 30- and 90-day post-operative complications, with no significant difference between ORC and RARC. Length of stay was significantly shorter in RARC group (median 7 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Open and robot-assisted procedures were safely performed by using a new advanced bipolar seal and cut technology (Caiman®). RARC demonstrated to be superior to ORC in terms of bleeding, transfusion rates and length of hospital stay, despite longer operative time.

Download Full-text

Clinical Outcomes between Stand-Alone Zero-Profile Spacers and Cervical Plate with Cage Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of 166 Patients

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10143076 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (14) ◽

pp. 3076

Author(s):

Samuel Sommaruga ◽

Joaquin Camara-Quintana ◽

Kishan Patel ◽

Aria Nouri ◽

Enrico Tessitore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Retrospective Analysis ◽

Surgical Outcomes ◽

Operative Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽

Cervical Discectomy ◽

Dysphagia Score ◽

Significant Difference

Stand-alone (SA) zero-profile implants are an alternative to cervical plating (CP) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). In this study, we investigate differences in surgical outcomes between SA and CP in ACDF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 166 patients with myelopathy and/or radiculopathy who had ACDF with SA or CP from Jan 2013–Dec 2016. We measured surgical outcomes including Bazaz dysphagia score at 3 months, Nurick grade at last follow-up, and length of hospital stay. 166 patients (92F/74M) were reviewed. 92 presented with radiculopathy (55%), 37 with myelopathy (22%), and 37 with myeloradiculopathy (22%). The average operative time with CP was longer than SA (194 ± 69 vs. 126 ± 46 min) (p < 0.001), as was the average length of hospital stay (2.1 ± 2 vs. 1.5 ± 1 days) (p = 0.006). At 3 months, 82 patients (49.4%) had a follow-up for dysphagia, with 3 patients reporting mild dysphagia and none reporting moderate or severe dysphagia. Nurick grade at last follow-up for the myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy cohorts improved in 63 patients (85%). Prolonged length of stay was associated with reduced odds of having an optimal outcome by 0.50 (CI = 0.35–0.85, p = 0.003). Overall, we demonstrate that there is no significant difference in neurological outcome or rates of dysphagia between SA and CP, and that both lead to overall improvement of symptoms based on Nurick grading. However, we also show that the SA group has shorter length of hospital stay and operative time compared to CP.

Download Full-text

The Benefit of Modified Rehabilitation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in Total Hip Replacement

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/003588408x285900 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 90 (5) ◽

pp. 406-411 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Anastasios K Lilikakis ◽

Beryl Gillespie ◽

Richard N Villar

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Total Hip Replacement ◽

Hip Replacement ◽

Surgical Techniques ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Minimally Invasive Techniques ◽

Rehabilitation Protocol ◽

Total Hip ◽

Invasive Techniques

INTRODUCTION We wished to assess if an intensive rehabilitation regimen alone, or one combined with modified anaesthetic and surgical techniques, can change the speed of rehabilitation or the length of hospital stay after total hip replacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS We compared 44 patients who had followed a traditional care pathway, with 38 patients who had rehabilitated under a new rehabilitation protocol, with 40 patients who had also received modified, minimally invasive techniques. The speed of rehabilitation was measured in terms of three specific milestones accomplished on the day after surgery. RESULTS We found a statistically significant improvement in the day after surgery each activity was possible. The length of hospital stay was reduced from 6.5 days to 5.4 days to 4.1 days, a difference which was also statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The data support the view that a new rehabilitation protocol alone can reduce the length of hospital stay and hasten rehabilitation. The combination of modified anaesthetic and minimally invasive surgical techniques with the new rehabilitation regimen can further improve short-term outcome after total hip replacement.

Download Full-text

Retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy vs. Conventional adrenalectomy in treatment of benign adrenal lesions: Comparative analysis

Acta chirurgica iugoslavica ◽

10.2298/aci0702045t ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 54 (2) ◽

pp. 45-48 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

G. Todorov ◽

Tc. Lukanova

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Operative Time ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽

Adrenal Tumors ◽

Endoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Median Operative Time

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is considered to be the standard of care for the surgical treatment of the adrenal gland? s pathology. Since the initial report of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 1992 and of retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy in 1994, it has evolved into a feasible and safe minimally invasive procedure for benign adrenal tumors. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 63 retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomies (REAs) and 45 conventional adrenalectomies (CAs) from 1996 to 2004 were evaluated. 61 patients underwent 63 REAs. Tumor size varied from 2 to 8 cm. Median age was 48.6 years. Median operative time was 135 min (45-240), median intraoperative blood loss - 85 ml (30- 550). The complication rate was 17.77%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (2-10). 44 patients underwent 45 conventional adenalectomies. Median age was 44.5 years (16-71). Intraoperative complication rate was 17.77%, postoperative - 22.22 %, Median operative time was 120 min (75 -240). Median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days (6-21). No statistically significant difference was established between median operative times of REA- and CA-groups (p=0.91). Conventional adrenalectomy was associated with a significantly increased complication rate (p= 0.009). Hospitalization was also longer after the open technique (d). Introduced in 1994 and displaying all advantages of minimal access surgery REA has become the standard of care for benign adrenal tumors. .

Download Full-text

Minimally Invasive versus Open Approach for Cervical Laminoforaminotomy

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ◽

10.1017/s0317167100011446 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 38 (2) ◽

pp. 262-267 ◽

Cited By ~ 37

Author(s):

Mark J. Winder ◽

Kenneth C. Thomas

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Radicular Pain ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Open Approach ◽

Cervical Foraminotomy ◽

Analgesic Use

Background:Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for radicular symptoms has become more prevalent. The reported experience with microscopic tubular assisted posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (MTPF) for the treatment of radicular pain is lacking. Tubular assisted techniques have been considered to offer significant benefit, over open procedures, in terms of minimizing tissue damage, operative time, blood loss, analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay. We hypothesized that MTPF reduces post-operative analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay over the traditional open laminoforaminotomy, with no difference in complication rates and, secondly, that MTPF is comparable to endoscopic posterior foraminotomy (EPF).Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of 107 patients who underwent posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for radicular pain between 1999 and 2009. Patient demographics, intra-operative parameters, length of hospitalization, post-operative analgesic use, complications and short-term neurological outcome were compared between groups.Results:Between 1999 and 2009, a total of 107 patients were identified to have undergone a cervical foraminotomy. An open approach was used in 65 patients, while 42 underwent MTPF. Operative time and complications were comparable between groups. Significant differences favoring MTPF were observed in operative blood loss, post-operative analgesic use and length of hospital stay (p<0.001). All results were comparable to previous reports utilizing EPF.Conclusions:MTPF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy significantly reduces blood loss, post-operative analgesic use and length of hospital stay compared to the standard open approach. Operative time and complication rates were comparable between both techniques, whilst MTPF offered similar results compared to EPF.

Download Full-text