scholarly journals Literatura y teatro en el cinismo de Diógenes de Sínope y Nietzsche

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Camilo Torres Estrada ◽  

Este artículo relaciona la biografía de Diógenes de Sínope, hecha por Diógenes Laercio, y Ecce Homo, la autobiografía de Friedrich Nietzsche. A través de una concepción del teatro, el propósito es relacionar ambos textos biográficos encontrando una escritura filosófica particular que se separa de las formas usuales de la teoría. A partir de este análisis es posible demostrar que ambos autores consideraban inseparables la forma y el contenido de su filosofía, que tenían una idea de la práctica indiferenciable de la teoría, y que sus maneras particulares de expresarse constituían por sí mismas una forma de pensamiento: la resistencia al sentido último, lo que los une al teatro y a la literatura.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-73
Author(s):  
Silas Borges Monteiro ◽  
Anaise Avila Severo

Este ensaio procura demonstrar que Heráclito poderia ser considerado leitor de Friedrich Nietzsche. Esta especulação sustenta-se, basicamente, sobre a decisão estilística de Nietzsche em escolher seus leitores, sobre as vivências partilhadas entre o filósofo alemão e o grego e da presença de Heráclito, em Ecce homo, como aquele com quem Nietzsche mais se sentia acolhido. O interesse mais evidente do jovem professor da Basileia sobre o filósofo obscuro se vê na destinação de tempo que ele dá em seu curso de 1873. Mais do que examinar as alternativas conceituais, o autor de O nascimento da tragédia quer aprender com as vivências dos pré-platônicos, sobretudo com seu filósofo trágico por excelência. Embora a relação estudada entre Nietzsche e Heráclito reconheça a óbvia questão cronológica, este ensaio fabula sobre possibilidades da anacronia de Heráclito leitor de Nietzsche.


1944 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Lőwith

To commemorate Nietzsche on the occasion of his hundredth anniversary is both easy and difficult. It is easy because one cannot but remember him as the prophet of our century. He is more alive in 1944 than he was in 1888 when he suddenly burned out like a volcano after the last eruption, calledEcce Homo. He knew every recess of the modern soul, its widest periphery and its hidden center. His problems are our problems and his predicament is our own. For this very reason it is also difficult to commemorate him. He is still becoming what he is, and one cannot but hesitate to sum up his final significance in the history of Western man and the Christian Occident.


Author(s):  
Andrew Hui

This chapter focuses on the aphorisms of Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche's philology on fragments became a philosophy of fragments when he abandoned his profession as a classicist in the late 1870s. Rather than just studying aphorisms, he started producing them. In the most productive stretch of his life—from Human, All Too Human (1878) to Ecce Homo (1888)—he composed thousands upon thousands of pithy sayings and maxims. Nietzsche proposes a radical hermeneutics that bridges writing and ethics: he wants his readers ultimately to stop reading, stop interpreting, and start living. For Nietzsche, readers must create at last their own values, for “nobody can get more out of things, including books, than what he already knows.”


Sosquua ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-43
Author(s):  
Ana Campos Isla

Este artículo propone revisar, señalar y determinar la importancia de las posturas dietéticas en el siglo actual, a partir de dos (2) pensadores claves. El primero es Plutarco y el texto Cómo mantenerse sano. El segundo es Friedrich Nietzsche, en particular, los primeros dos (2) apartados de Ecce Homo. El texto también introduce a la reflexión sobre ideas principales del discurso psicoanalítico, diferente al filosófico; por su incidencia en la lectura y en el trabajo clínico en lo que acontece con los sujetos en relación con el cuerpo actualmente. Finalmente, esboza algunas divergencias y encuentros entre estos discursos.


Author(s):  
John Marmysz

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.


Author(s):  
Vanessa Lemm

Readers of Giorgio Agamben would agree that the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is not one of his primary interlocutors. As such, Agamben’s engagement with Nietzsche is different from the French reception of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Georges Bataille, as well as in his contemporary Italian colleague Roberto Esposito, for whom Nietzsche’s philosophy is a key point of reference in their thinking of politics beyond sovereignty. Agamben’s stance towards the thought of Nietzsche may seem ambiguous to some readers, in particular with regard to his shifting position on Nietzsche’s much-debated vision of the eternal recurrence of the same.


1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-24
Author(s):  
Rodolphe Gasché
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 238-262
Author(s):  
Virgil W. Brower

This article exploits a core defect in the phenomenology of sensation and self. Although phenomenology has made great strides in redeeming the body from cognitive solipsisms that often follow short-sighted readings of Descartes and Kant, it has not grappled with the specific kind of corporeal self-reflexivity that emerges in the oral sense of taste with the thoroughness it deserves. This path is illuminated by the works of Martin Luther, Jean-Luc Marion, and Jacques Derrida as they attempt to think through the specific phenomena accessible through the lips, tongue, and mouth. Their attempts are, in turn, supplemented with detours through Walter Benjamin, Hélène Cixous, and Friedrich Nietzsche. The paper draws attention to the German distinction between Geschmack and Kosten as well as the role taste may play in relation to faith, the call to love, justice, and messianism. The messiah of love and justice will have been that one who proclaims: taste the flesh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document