scholarly journals EFFECT OF STRETCHING TO RELIEVE SPASTICITY IN NEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONS- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Aditi Hari Bhilwade ◽  
Suvarna Ganvir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Literature Evidence ◽  
Neurological Conditions

Background- Stretching is most commonly used technique to reduce spasticity. There are various techniques in reducing spasticity in neurological conditions. Objective- To investigate the literature evidence for the effect of stretching on spasticity in neurological conditions. Data sources- A systematic review of all literature found in last 20 years are related to the different techniques of stretching to reduce spasticity (keywords: stretching, spasticity) from PubMed, Google scholar, Science direct and Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Electronic searching was used to find the source literature using definitive keywords. Conclusion- There are the wide variety of the studies investigating the effect of stretching to relieve spasticity in neurological conditions. The further studies can be done to investigate the long-term effects of stretching to reduce spasticity.  

scholarly journals More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Lopez-Leon ◽  
Talia Wegman-Ostrosky ◽  
Carol Perelman ◽  
Rosalinda Sepulveda ◽  
Paulina A. Rebolledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Attention Disorder ◽  
Initial Recovery ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractCOVID-19 can involve persistence, sequelae, and other medical complications that last weeks to months after initial recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify studies assessing the long-term effects of COVID-19. LitCOVID and Embase were searched to identify articles with original data published before the 1st of January 2021, with a minimum of 100 patients. For effects reported in two or more studies, meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed using the MetaXL software to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% CI. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A total of 18,251 publications were identified, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of 55 long-term effects was estimated, 21 meta-analyses were performed, and 47,910 patients were included (age 17–87 years). The included studies defined long-COVID as ranging from 14 to 110 days post-viral infection. It was estimated that 80% of the infected patients with SARS-CoV-2 developed one or more long-term symptoms. The five most common symptoms were fatigue (58%), headache (44%), attention disorder (27%), hair loss (25%), and dyspnea (24%). Multi-disciplinary teams are crucial to developing preventive measures, rehabilitation techniques, and clinical management strategies with whole-patient perspectives designed to address long COVID-19 care.

Small-Scale Deliberation and Mass Democracy: A Systematic Review of the Spillover Effects of Deliberative Minipublics

2021 ◽  
pp. 003232172110072
Author(s):  
Ramon van der Does ◽  
Vincent Jacquet
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Spillover Effects ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Current Crisis ◽  
Mass Democracy

Deliberative minipublics are popular tools to address the current crisis in democracy. However, it remains ambiguous to what degree these small-scale forums matter for mass democracy. In this study, we ask the question to what extent minipublics have “spillover effects” on lay citizens—that is, long-term effects on participating citizens and effects on non-participating citizens. We answer this question by means of a systematic review of the empirical research on minipublics’ spillover effects published before 2019. We identify 60 eligible studies published between 1999 and 2018 and provide a synthesis of the empirical results. We show that the evidence for most spillover effects remains tentative because the relevant body of empirical evidence is still small. Based on the review, we discuss the implications for democratic theory and outline several trajectories for future research.

scholarly journals Immediate and long-term effects of mechanical loading on Achilles tendon volume: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 110289
Author(s):  
Eman Merza ◽  
Stephen Pearson ◽  
Glen Lichtwark ◽  
Meg Ollason ◽  
Peter Malliaras
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Mechanical Loading ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Effects

Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms

2007 ◽  
Vol 146 (7) ◽  
pp. 502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel T. Brewer ◽  
Talya Salz ◽  
Sarah E. Lillie
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Long Term Effects

scholarly journals Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Anton Jochum Keestra ◽  
Obada Barry ◽  
Lianne de Jong ◽  
Gerhard Wahl
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Long Term Effects

scholarly journals Os impactos da pandemia de COVID-19 na mobilidade urbana: uma revisão narrativa de literatura

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. e460101623917
Author(s):  
Francisca Rafaela Pereira de Amorim Castro Rosa ◽  
Bárbara Queiroz de Figueiredo ◽  
Bruno Rodrigues Cancela ◽  
Dieison Danrlei Roehrs ◽  
João Victor Marques de Matos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Information Services ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
National Library ◽  
Electronic Library ◽  
Cochrane Database

Introdução: a mobilidade urbana é entendida como a capacidade cotidiana de deslocamento de pessoas e bens no espaço urbano de forma segura e em tempo considerado adequado. Recentemente, a situação pandêmica foi gradualmente amenizada e o plano de recuperação econômica e social foi colocado em pauta pelo governo durante o período pós-epidemia. Nessas circunstâncias, o sistema de transporte urbano desempenha um papel crucial no processo de recuperação social e econômica como garantia básica da cidade. Portanto, maior atenção deve ser dada aos impactos da pandemia de COVID-19 no sistema de transporte urbano, bem como no comportamento de viagem. Objetivo: evidenciar os impactos causados pela pandemia de COVID-19 na mobilidade urbana. Metodologia: trata-se de revisão narrativa da literatura, com estudos acoplados nas seguintes bases de dados: National Library of Medicine (PubMed MEDLINE), Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Google Scholar, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e EBSCO Information Services. Resultados: alguns impactos sobre a mobilidade urbana puderam ser observados devido ao alto grau de contágio do novo coronavírus e, portanto, à necessidade de permanecer em casa e manter um distanciamento mínimo. São impactos a princípio sociais, econômicos ou ambientais, mas que apresentam forte relação com a mobilidade urbana. Em geral houve uma drástica diminuição da locomoção nas cidades, que se encontraram vazias, e há um temor com relação à volta às atividades normais à medida que o isolamento vai sendo flexibilizado. Considerações finais: a pandemia de COVID-19 provocou inúmeras mudanças na vida da população mundial. Na mobilidade urbana não foi diferente. Com o fechamento do comércio considerado não essencial, a suspensão de aulas e a instalação de regimes de teletrabalho, grande parte dos deslocamentos diários foram interrompidos e/ou modificados. Medidas como a instalação de políticas de subsídio do transporte público, de ampliação das ciclovias, de aplicação de ações de desestímulo do uso do transporte individual motorizado, de melhora na segurança pública e de circulação de pedestres e ciclistas etc., se mostraram urgentes durante a quarentena, não apenas para gerar condições mínimas para mobilidade ativa, mas também para melhorar a qualidade de vida da população como um todo.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials of Long-Term Opioid Management for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

2011 ◽  
Vol 3;14 (2;3) ◽  
pp. 91-121
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Chronic Opioid Therapy ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Background: Even though opioids have been used for pain for thousands of years, opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain is controversial due to concerns regarding the long-term effectiveness and safety, particularly the risk of tolerance, dependance, or abuse. While the debate continues, the use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain has increased exponentially. Even though evidence is limited, multiple expert panels have concluded that chronic opioid therapy can be effective therapy for carefully selected and monitored patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Study Design: A systematic review of randomized trials of opioid management for chronic noncancer pain. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of opioids in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Methods: A comprehensive evaluation of the literature relating to opioids in chronic non-cancer pain was performed. The literature was evaluated according to Cochrane review criteria for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Jadad criteria. A literature search was conducted by using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ECRI Institute Library, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website, U.S. National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), clinical trials, systematic reviews and cross references from systematic reviews. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and used by other systematic reviews and guidelines. Outcome Measures: Pain relief was the primary outcome measure. Other outcome measures were functional improvement, withdrawals, and adverse effects. Results: Based on the USPSTF criteria, the indicated level of evidence was fair for Tramadol in managing osteoarthritis. For all the drugs assessed, including Tramadol, for all other conditions, the evidence was poor based on either weak positive evidence, indeterminate evidence, or negative evidence. Limitations: A paucity of literature, specifically with follow-up beyond 12 weeks for all types of opioids with controlled trials for various chronic non-cancer pain conditions. Conclusions: This systematic review illustrated fair evidence for Tramadol in managing osteoarthritis with poor evidence for all other drugs and conditions. Thus, recommendations must be based on non-randomized studies. Key words: Chronic non-cancer pain, opioids, opioid efficacy, opioid effectiveness, significant pain relief, functional improvement, adverse effects, morphine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, tramadol, buprenorphine, methadone, tapentadol, oxycodone, oxymorphone, systematic reviews, randomized trials

scholarly journals Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Antonio Salvador-Oliván ◽  
Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca ◽  
Rosario Arquero-Avilés
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Average Precision ◽  
Search Filter ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Relevant Publication

Objective: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or updating reviews and for decision-making in health care. This study aimed to develop a search filter for retrieving systematic reviews that improves upon the performance of the PubMed systematic review search filter.Methods: Search terms were identified from abstracts of reviews published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the titles of articles indexed as systematic reviews in PubMed. Both the precision of the candidate terms and the number of systematic reviews retrieved from PubMed were evaluated after excluding the subset of articles retrieved by the PubMed systematic review filter. Terms that achieved a precision greater than 70% and relevant publication types indexed with MeSH terms were included in the filter search strategy.Results: The search strategy used in our filter added specific terms not included in PubMed’s systematic review filter and achieved a 61.3% increase in the number of retrieved articles that are potential systematic reviews. Moreover, it achieved an average precision that is likely greater than 80%.Conclusions: The developed search filter will enable users to identify more systematic reviews from PubMed than the PubMed systematic review filter with high precision.

scholarly journals Distúrbios olfatórios decorrentes de infecção por SARS-CoV-2: fisiopatologia, fatores de risco e possíveis intervenções

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e180101119618
Author(s):  
Júlia Fernandes Nogueira ◽  
Bárbara Queiroz de Figueiredo ◽  
Ana Luísa de Castro Melo ◽  
Ana Paula Ferreira Araújo ◽  
Isabella Barata Linces Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Information Services ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
National Library ◽  
Electronic Library ◽  
Cochrane Database

Introdução: existem relatos de uma manifestação secundária à infecção e atuação viral no organismo: distúrbios do olfato e, consequentemente, do paladar, e que estão presentes antes mesmo da confirmação molecular da infecção causada por SARS-CoV-2. Objetivo: responder quais são os mecanismos de disfunções olfatórias decorrentes da Covid-19, bem como fatores de risco e possíveis intervenções. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva do tipo revisão integrativa da literatura. A pesquisa foi realizada através do acesso online nas bases de dados National Library of Medicine (PubMed MEDLINE), Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Google Scholar, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e EBSCO Information Services, no mês de agosto de 2021. Resultados: Os mecanismos dos distúrbios olfatórios relacionados à infecção por SARS-CoV-2 ainda são desconhecidos, mas é provavelmente o resultado de vários padrões, como edema da mucosa nasal, dano epitelial olfatório e até mesmo envolvimento da região central vias olfativas. Foi demonstrado que a expressão de enzima conversora de angiotensina (ACE2) foi encontrada na camada basal do epitélio escamoso não queratinizante na mucosa nasal e oral e na nasofaringe. Conclusão: Podem ocorrer distúrbios olfativo-gustativos em intensidades variáveis e prévios aos sintomas gerais da Covid-19, devem ser considerados como parte dos sintomas da doença, mesmo em quadros leves. Não há ainda evidências científicas de tratamentos específicos para tais distúrbios na Covid-19, sendo de importância que estudos posteriores consigam, por meio de empirismo clínico, melhor propedêutica para esses casos, principalmente aqueles que manifestam-se como sequela duradoura da infecção por SARS-CoV-2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document