The Effect of Restaurant Employees’ Shared Leadership on their LMX, TMX and Knowledge Sharing

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 77-103
Author(s):  
Ho-Yeol Jeong ◽  
Gyu-Min Lee
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 100590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwatobi A. Ogunmokun ◽  
Kayode Kolawole Eluwole ◽  
Turgay Avci ◽  
Taiwo Temitope Lasisi ◽  
Juliet E. Ikhide

Author(s):  
Ana Martins ◽  
Isabel Martins ◽  
Orlando Petiz Pereira

Organizations are currently living through profound changes while dealing with the prevailing rate of information change and innovation. Alternative ways of educating organizations highlight the strategic importance of humanization in organizations. Humanization is the stabilizer of productivity and communities of practice (CoPs) – the tools which enable employees to act in this space. Organizations that nurture CoPs embrace learning, are sensitive, tolerant, and cooperate. CoPs are nurtured by cooperation while disregarding both competition and egotism. Strategic variables emerge in this context which leads to the paradigm shift focusing on trust, voluntary sharing, employees' selflessness, and shared leadership. Knowledge in an organization and within each employee is viewed as complementary and not a substitute or as an issue of contention. Knowledge sharing is a necessary condition to improve both organizational performance and its attractiveness. The importance of CoPs in this chapter focuses on the humanization perspective as CoPs promote learning in business contexts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 150-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Jeoung Han ◽  
Yunsoo Lee ◽  
Michael Beyerlein ◽  
Judith Kolb

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the effect of shared leadership on student project team processes and outcomes. The authors focused on shared leadership and its association with team processes (coordination, goal commitment and knowledge sharing) and team performance.Design/methodology/approachTo examine the shared leadership, team processes and performance model, the authors conducted two separate surveys of 158 graduate and undergraduate students working in project teams at a large southwestern university.FindingsResults showed that shared leadership positively affected coordination activities, goal commitment and knowledge sharing, which in turn positively affect team performance. Each team process factor had a mediation effect, although shared leadership had no direct effect on team performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis research adds to the knowledge of important team process factors through which shared leadership indirectly affects team performance.Practical implicationsBased on the findings, the authors provided implications for students and instructors that shared leadership can facilitate team performance by enabling team members to coordinate activities, commit to goals and share knowledge effectively.Originality/valueThis study presents an initial understanding of the shared leadership-team performance relationship by introducing influential variables, such as coordination activities, goal commitment and knowledge sharing in a team.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Zielińska

This article concerns work in dispersed teams, and particularly the sharing of leadership tasks through members of such teams. The research tool created on the scientific literature was presented (questionnaire). This tool was used in the pilot study, which covered 5 teams of various degrees of dispersion, formed by 47 people. The results of the study made it possible to conclude that knowledge sharing is the most shared leadership task. Moreover, a correlation between the degree of shared leadership tasks and the degree of team dispersion was discovered


Author(s):  
Ana Martins ◽  
Isabel Martins ◽  
Orlando Petiz Pereira

Organizations are currently living through profound changes while dealing with the prevailing rate of information change and innovation. Alternative ways of educating organizations highlight the strategic importance of humanization in organizations. Humanization is the stabilizer of productivity and communities of practice (CoPs) – the tools which enable employees to act in this space. Organizations that nurture CoPs embrace learning, are sensitive, tolerant, and cooperate. CoPs are nurtured by cooperation while disregarding both competition and egotism. Strategic variables emerge in this context which leads to the paradigm shift focusing on trust, voluntary sharing, employees' selflessness, and shared leadership. Knowledge in an organization and within each employee is viewed as complementary and not a substitute or as an issue of contention. Knowledge sharing is a necessary condition to improve both organizational performance and its attractiveness. The importance of CoPs in this chapter focuses on the humanization perspective as CoPs promote learning in business contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document