Seksueel onaangepast gedrag bij een patiënt met dementie: literatuurreview en casusrapport

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. SEAUX ◽  
K. GOEDSEELS ◽  
J. DE LEPELEIRE
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Pharmacological Treatments ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
History Of ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Sexually inappropriate behaviour in a patient with dementia: literature review and case report In this paper, the medical history of a 75-year-old man with dementia and sexually inappropriate behaviour (SIB) is described. An overview of the literature regarding the approach and treatment of SIB in persons with dementia was performed. PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane database were consulted, and thirteen articles selected. There are no randomised controlled trials available. The literature is limited to case studies and reviews of case studies. Non-pharmacological treatments are perceived to be the first step, although they are rarely studied. There is no consensus regarding a pharmacological approach. However, all studies suggest the paradigm of “start low and go slow”. A variety of drugs have been described. When starting a pharmacological treatment, it is recommended to keep in mind comorbidities and possible side-effects. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) seem to be the preferred first line treatment if the behaviour is not too harmful. If the behaviour is intrusive, anti-androgens seem to be the drug of choice. Further research is needed: a consensus regarding the definition and the development of a screening tool could support randomised controlled trials concerning pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Research concerning ethical dilemmas should, however, not be neglected.

scholarly journals Non-pharmacological interventions in dementia

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Douglas ◽  
Ian James ◽  
Clive Ballard
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Pharmacological Treatments ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Valid Data ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Reality Orientation

It is increasingly recognised that pharmacological treatments for dementia should be used as a second-line approach and that non-pharmacological options should, in best practice, be pursued first. This review examines current non-pharmacological approaches. It highlights the more traditional treatments such as behavioural therapy, reality orientation and validation therapy, and also examines the potential of interesting new alternative options such as cognitive therapy, aromatherapy and multisensory therapies. The current literature is explored with particular reference to recent research, especially randomised controlled trials in the area. Although many non-pharmacological treatments have reported benefits in multiple research studies, there is a need for further reliable and valid data before the efficacy of these approaches is more widely recognised.

scholarly journals Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e043370
Author(s):  
Ainsley Matthewson ◽  
Olena Bereznyakova ◽  
Brian Dewar ◽  
Alexandra Davis ◽  
Mark Fedyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Reference Centre ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionWomen have historically been under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including many landmark RCTs that established standards of care. In light of this fact, some modern researchers are calling for replication of earlier landmark trials with women only. This approach is ethically concerning, in that it would require some enrolled women to be deprived of treatments that are currently considered standard of care.ObjectiveIn an attempt to better understand the justification of a women-only approach to designing clinical trials, this study looks to systematically categorise the number of women-only RCTs for conditions that affect both men and women and the reasons given within the medical and philosophical literatures to perform them.MethodologyThis scoping review of the literature will search, screen and select articles based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, after which a grounded theory approach will be used to synthesise the data. It is expected that there will be a variety of reasons given for why a women-only trial may be justified. Electronic databases that will be searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Web of Science Proceedings, ClinicalTrials.gov, Philosopher’s Index, Phil Papers, JSTOR, Periodicals Archive Online, Project MUSE and the National Reference Centre for Bioethics.SignificanceThe scope of this study is to determine published rationales used to justify women-only randomised trials, both in the case of new trials and in the repetition of landmark trials.Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics board approval is not required for this study as there is no participant involvement. Results will be published as a stand-alone manuscript and will inform a larger project related to the ethics of a women-only RCT of carotid intervention for women with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis.

Non-pharmacological interventions to improve constipation amongst older adults in long-term care settings: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 992-999
Author(s):  
Iria Dobarrio-Sanz ◽  
José Manuel Hernández-Padilla ◽  
María Mar López-Rodríguez ◽  
Cayetano Fernández-Sola ◽  
José Granero-Molina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Efficacy of antidepressants in treating the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: meta-analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 197 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surendra P. Singh ◽  
Vidhi Singh ◽  
Nilamadhab Kar ◽  
Kelvin Chan
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chronic Schizophrenia ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Issue ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundTreatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia continues to be a major clinical issue.AimsTo analyse the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia.MethodSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of antidepressants and placebo on the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia, measured through standardised rating scales. Outcome was measured as standardised mean difference between end-of-trial and baseline scores of negative symptoms.ResultsThere were 23 trials from 22 publications (n = 819). The antidepressants involved were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, reboxetine, mianserin, trazodone and ritanserin; trials on other antidepressants were not available. The overall standardised mean difference was moderate (–0.48) in favour of antidepressants and subgroup analysis revealed significant responses for fluoxetine, trazodone and ritanserin.ConclusionsAntidepressants along with antipsychotics are more effective in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone.

Acupuncture Studies on Pain

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moolamanil Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Complementary Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Basic Understanding ◽  
History Of ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Peripheral Sensory

The relegation of acupuncture to complementary therapy ignores the history of its development and restricts possibilities for its clinical use and further research. Clinical studies with randomised, controlled trials and double blinding require reconsideration and adaptation when using acupuncture for treatment when multiple patient and treatment variables are involved. Ample experimental evidence exists for acupuncture to be considered as a modality of peripheral sensory stimulation, but present clinical research has not incontrovertibly validated the use of acupuncture on patients with chronic pain. A basic understanding of the neuro-physiology of pain and its differentiation does provide better indications for its use. More consistent results may then be obtained, as seen from a few recent studies.

scholarly journals Impact of pharmacological Interventions on fertility outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMMED ABDALLA ◽  
Najeeb Shah ◽  
Harshal Deshmukh ◽  
Amirhossein Sahebkar ◽  
Linda Östlundh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Ovulation Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine condition associated with sub-fertility, infertility and poor reproductive outcomes. Objectives: To review the effectiveness of different pharmacological interventions on fertility outcomes in women with PCOS. Search Strategy: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science in April 2020 and updated the search in PubMed March 2021. Selection Criteria: Two independent reviewers selected studies, and only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Thirty-four RCTs that met the eligibility criteria were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using the random effect model. Main Results: There was a significant increase in pregnancy rate with follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) vs clomiphene citrate (CC)+ metformin (Odd Ratio(OR):4.08; 95%CI:1.12-14.83,I²=79%), Letrozole vs CC (OR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.34-1.86, I²= 0%), metformin vs placebo(OR: 3.00; 95%CI: 1.95-4.59, I²= 0%) and with CC+ metformin vs CC (OR: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.02-2.16, I²= 39%). There were significant increases in ovulation rate with CC+ metformin vs FSH (OR: 0.09; 95%CI: 0.02-0.37, I² = 75%), CC+ metformin vs CC (OR: 2.04; 95%CI: 1.35-3.08, I² = 63%) and with Letrozole vs CC (OR: 1.60; 95%CI: 1.02-2.52, I²= 88%). A significant increase in live birth with Letrozole vs CC (OR: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.21-2.21, I² = 0%) was observed. Conclusions: CC, letrozole alone or either added to metformin, were associated with a significant increase in the pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, and live birth rate in women with PCOS. Funding: No fund for the review.

scholarly journals Effect on Neonatal Outcome of Pharmacological Interventions for Attenuation of the Maternal Haemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aman ◽  
B. Salim ◽  
K. Munshi ◽  
S. A. Raza ◽  
F. A. Khan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Opioid Analgesics ◽  
Haemodynamic Response ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Randomised Controlled

The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect on neonatal outcome of pharmacological interventions used for attenuation of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing caesarean Section under general anaesthesia. A systematic search of randomised controlled trials from 1990 to 2015 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the Apgar score at five minutes and secondary outcomes were umbilical arterial blood gas parameters and neurological adaptive capacity scores. Twenty-seven randomised controlled trials (1,689 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Only five studies using opioids (383 patients) and five studies using non-opioid analgesics (358 patients) were subjected to meta-analysis. The Apgar score at five minutes was significantly lower in neonates of opioid-treated mothers (mean difference: −0.29, 95% confidence interval −0.56 to −0.02, P-value=0.03) compared to mothers in the control group; the umbilical arterial pH was lower and there was a higher requirement for tactile stimulation in neonates. No difference was seen in Apgar scores of neonates of mothers administered non-opioid analgesics compared to placebo. No difference was observed in other parameters between opioid- or non-opioid-treated mothers. This review suggests that opioid interventions for attenuation of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in pregnant patients under general anaesthesia affect neonatal Apgar scores at five minutes in neonates but the difference did not appear to be clinically meaningful. We were unable to demonstrate any difference in safety.

scholarly journals Role of personality disorder in randomised controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for adults with mood disorders: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e025145
Author(s):  
Bianca E Kavanagh ◽  
Sharon Lee Brennan-Olsen ◽  
Alyna Turner ◽  
Olivia M Dean ◽  
Michael Berk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionRemission rates for mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, remain relatively low despite available treatments, and many patients fail to respond adequately to these interventions. Evidence suggests that personality disorder may play a role in poor outcomes. Although personality disorders are common in patients with mood disorders, it remains unknown whether personality disorder affects treatment outcomes in mood disorders. We aim to review currently available evidence regarding the role of personality disorder on pharmacological interventions in randomised controlled trials for adults with mood disorders.Methods and analysisA systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) via cochranelibrary.com, PubMed via PubMed, EMBASE via embase.com, PsycINFO via Ebsco and CINAHL Complete via Ebsco databases will be conducted to identify randomised controlled trials that have investigated pharmacological interventions in participants aged 18 years or older for mood disorders (ie, depressive disorders and bipolar spectrum disorders) and have also included assessment of personality disorder. One reviewer will screen studies against the predetermined eligibility criteria, and a second reviewer will confirm eligible studies. Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A systematic review, and if sufficient evidence is identified, a meta-analysis will be completed. Meta-analysis will be conducted using the standardised mean difference approach and reported with 95% CIs. A random effects model will be employed and statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated using the I2 statistic. Prespecified subgroup analyses will be completed.Ethics and disseminationAs this systematic review will use published data, ethics permission will not be required. The outcomes of this systematic review will be published in a relevant scientific journal and presented at a research conference.Trial registration numberCRD42018089279.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document