scholarly journals Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for the Head and Neck: Current and Future Indications

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Quon ◽  
Bert W O'Malley ◽  
Gregory S Weinstein

Abstract Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) offers many technical advancements to existing endoscopic and transoral surgical approaches. This has faciliated a safer, less morbid and potentially more effective application of surgery to the management of both benign and malignant diseases in the head and neck. As this surgical approach gains widespread acceptance, it is important for all members of the treatment team to understand the strengths and current limitations especially when TORS is applied for malignant diseases. As of December 2009, Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of the da Vinci® surgical system and TORS for selected malignancies of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx and all benign disease. Of these sites, the greatest experience and longest duration of follow-up has been in the use of TORS for the management of oropharyngeal carcinomas where at least comparable oncologic outcomes and reduced long-term feeding tube dependency rates have been reported. Other anatomic sites where TORS has shown benefit based on preclinical studies and early human experiences include the larynx, hypopharynx, parapharyngeal space and infratemporal fossa for both benign and selected malignant tumors. Experience to date has demonstrated that the improved visualization with the robotic system offers the potential for improved oncologic resection with reduced morbidity. Based on present studies and outcomes data in conjunction with ongoing investigations, it is anticipated that TORS will make a major impact in the way we manage benign and malignant tumors within the head and neck and skull base.

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Dowthwaite ◽  
Jason H. Franklin ◽  
David A. Palma ◽  
Kevin Fung ◽  
John Yoo ◽  
...  

Background. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an emerging treatment option for the treatment of head and neck malignancies, particularly for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Preliminary studies have demonstrated excellent oncologic and functional outcomes that have led to a resurgence of interest in the primary surgical management of OPSCC. The aim of the present study was to review the evidence base supporting the use of TORS in OPSCC. Methods. Studies evaluating the application of TORS in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and more specifically OPSCC, were identified for review. Further searches were made of reference lists for complete evaluation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in treating OPSCC. Results. Seventeen results relating to the application of TORS in treatment of OPSCC were identified. Further results relating to the role of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in OPSCC were included for review. Feasibility, oncologic, and functional data is summarized and discussed. Discussion. Management strategies for patients with OPSCC continue to evolve. Minimally invasive surgical techniques including TORS and TLM offer impressive functional and oncologic outcomes particularly for patients with early T-classification and low-volume regional metastatic disease. Potential exists for treatment deintensification, particularly in patients who are HPV positive.


Author(s):  
Magis Mandapathil ◽  
Jens E. Meyer

Abstract Purpose Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. Results A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. Conclusion This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.


Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel H. H. Larsen ◽  
Susanne I. Scott ◽  
Hani I. Channir ◽  
Anne K. Ø. Madsen ◽  
Birgitte W. Charabi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P164-P164
Author(s):  
Lane D. Squires ◽  
Toby O. Steele ◽  
Vincent L. Biron ◽  
Quang K. Luu ◽  
D. Gregory Farwell ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Y. Kang ◽  
Peter T. Dziegielewski ◽  
Matthew O. Old ◽  
Enver Ozer

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (12) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
Harman S. Parhar ◽  
David Shimunov ◽  
Jason G. Newman ◽  
Steven B. Cannady ◽  
Karthik Rajasekaran ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 318 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Lam ◽  
G.M. Scott ◽  
D.A. Palma ◽  
K. Fung ◽  
A.V. Louie

Background  Radiotherapy (rt) has been the standard treatment for early oropharyngeal cancer, achieving excellent outcomes, but with significant toxicities. Transoral robotic surgery (tors) has emerged as a promising alternative. A decision aid (da) can help to establish patient treatment preferences.Methods A da was developed and piloted in 40 healthy adult volunteers. Assuming equal oncologic outcomes of the treatments, participants indicated their preference. The treatment trade-off point was then established, and participant perceptions were elicited.Results More than 80% of participants initially selected tors for treatment, regardless of facilitator background. For all participants, the treatment trade-off point changed after an average 15% cure benefit. Treatment toxicities, duration, novelty, and perceptions all influenced treatment selection. All subjects valued the da.Conclusions A da developed for early oropharyngeal cancer treatment holds promise in the era of shared decision making. Assuming equal cure rates, tors was preferred over rt by healthy volunteers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document