Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin

Clinical Relevance The improvement of resin-enamel bond strengths after using Si-C paper and diamond burs for enamel preparation is material dependent. No degradation of enamel bond strength could be observed for any one-step self-etch adhesive system after 12 months of water storage.

Download Full-text

Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Microtensile Bond Strengths of Total-etch and Self-etch Adhesives

Operative Dentistry ◽

10.2341/04-161 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 31 (1) ◽

pp. 25-32 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

M. Toledano ◽

R. Osorio ◽

A. Albaladejo ◽

F. S. Aguilera ◽

F. R. Tay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cyclic Loading ◽

Clinical Relevance ◽

Acid Etching ◽

One Step ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch ◽

Etching System ◽

Better Than

Clinical Relevance Resin-dentin bonds, which may have an influence on the long-term success of restorations, are prone to deterioration after cyclic loading. The tested one-step self-etching system (Etch&Prime 3.0) provided the least reliable dentin adhesion. After acid etching of dentin, alcohol/based adhesives performed better than those containing acetone as solvent.

Download Full-text

Bond Strengths of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives to Laser-Irradiated and Bur-Cut Dentin After Water Storage and Thermocycling

Photomedicine and Laser Surgery ◽

10.1089/pho.2011.3170 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (4) ◽

pp. 214-221 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Gulsah E Akin ◽

Seyda Herguner-Siso ◽

Mutlu Ozcan ◽

Ozden Ozel-Bektas ◽

Hakan Akin

Keyword(s):

Water Storage ◽

One Step ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch

Download Full-text

Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel

European Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.1055/s-0039-1698962 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 06 (03) ◽

pp. 280-286 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

A. Ruya Yazici ◽

Zeren Yildirim ◽

Atila Ertan ◽

Gül Ozgunaltay ◽

Berrin Dayangac ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Third Molar ◽

Bonding Performance ◽

Etch And Rinse ◽

One Step ◽

Bonferroni Test ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch

ABSTRACTObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel.Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S3 Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocycling (5°C-55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17).Conclusions:Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:280-286)

Download Full-text

Effects of Additional Acid Etching on the Dentin Bond Strengths of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives Applied to Primary Teeth

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry ◽

10.1111/jerd.12273 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 110-117 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yuhyun Kim ◽

Shin Kim ◽

Taesung Jeong ◽

Sung-Ae Son ◽

Jiyeon Kim

Keyword(s):

Primary Teeth ◽

Acid Etching ◽

One Step ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch

Download Full-text

Initial and long-term bond strengths of one-step self-etch adhesives with silane coupling agent to enamel-dentin-composite in combined situation

Dental Materials Journal ◽

10.4012/dmj.2015-050 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 34 (5) ◽

pp. 663-670 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Teerapong MAMANEE ◽

Masahiro TAKAHASHI ◽

Masatoshi NAKAJIMA ◽

Richard M. FOXTON ◽

Junji TAGAMI

Keyword(s):

Coupling Agent ◽

Silane Coupling Agent ◽

Silane Coupling ◽

One Step ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch

Download Full-text

Prolonged Curing Time Reduces the Effects of Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Bond Strength of One-step Self-etch Adhesives

Operative Dentistry ◽

10.2341/12-180-l ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 38 (5) ◽

pp. 545-554 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

VP Feitosa ◽

TF Watson ◽

RP Vitti ◽

A Bacchi ◽

L Correr-Sobrinho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Failure Mode ◽

Pressure Control ◽

Cohesive Failure ◽

Control Groups ◽

Microtensile Bond Strength ◽

Light Curing ◽

One Step ◽

Bond Strengths ◽

Self Etch

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of extended light-curing procedures on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of one-step self-etch adhesives (1-SEAs) submitted to simulated pulpal pressure. Coronal deep-dentin specimens were bonded using Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Adper Easy Bond (EB), or G-Bond Plus (GB) following the manufacturers' recommendations and light-cured for 10 seconds or 40 seconds. The dentin-bonded specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours without pulpal pressure (control) or submitted to 20 cm H2O simulated pulpal pressure for 24 hours. The specimens were cut into matchsticks and subjected to μTBS testing. The data were statistically analyzed using the three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (p<0.05). Debonded sticks were investigated through scanning electron microscopy. EB obtained higher bond strengths than GB and S3. However, prolonged light activation (40 seconds) provided higher μTBS for all adhesives when submitted to pulpal pressure. Conversely, pulpal pressure caused a drop in μTBS in EB and S3 when light-cured for 10 seconds. A mixed failure mode was mainly attained for the control groups, whereas the specimens submitted to pulpal pressure failed in the adhesive mode. The μTBS of GB was not affected by pulpal pressure when light-cured for 10 seconds. Adhesive was the most prevalent failure mode, except when light-cured for 40 seconds, which showed predominantly cohesive failure. Extended curing times improved the resistance of 1-SEAs to simulated pulpal pressure.

Download Full-text

One-Year Clinical Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of a One-Step, Self-Etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesion Therapy

International Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.1155/2015/984065 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Babacar Faye ◽

Mouhamed Sarr ◽

Khaly Bane ◽

Adjaratou Wakha Aidara ◽

Seydina Ousmane Niang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Performance ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Recall Rate ◽

Acid Etching ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Usphs Criteria ◽

One Step ◽

One Year ◽

The One ◽

Self Etch

This study evaluated the one-year clinical performance of a one-step, self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-in-One, Kerr, CA, USA) combined with a composite (Herculite XRV Ultra, Kerr Hawe, CA, USA) to restore NCCLs with or without prior acid etching. Restorations performed by the same practitioner were evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months using modified USPHS criteria. At 6 months, the recall rate was 100%. The retention rate was 84.2% for restorations with prior acid etching, but statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and 6 months. Without acid etching, the retention rate was 77%, and no statistically significant difference was noted between 3 and 6 months. Marginal integrity (93.7% with and 87.7% without acid etching) and discoloration (95.3% with and 92.9% without acid etching) were scored as Alpha or Bravo, with better results after acid etching. After one year, the recall rate was 58.06%. Loss of pulp vitality, postoperative sensitivity, or secondary caries were not observed. After one year retention rate was of 90.6% and 76.9% with and without acid conditioning. Optibond All-in-One performs at a satisfactory clinical performance level for restoration of NCCLs after 12 months especially after acid etching.

Download Full-text