Framing energy justice in the UK: the nuclear case

Author(s):  
Catherine Butler ◽  
Peter Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Yiming Xiao ◽  
Han Wu ◽  
Guohua Wang ◽  
Hong Mei

Energy poverty is one of the main challenges facing humanity in the 21st century. Research on energy poverty is becoming a common focus of scholars in many areas. Bibliometrics can help researchers dig deep into the information of specific research fields from a quantitative perspective. In this study, we collected 1018 research papers in the field of energy poverty published in the period 1999–2019 from the Web of Science databases and conducted a bibliometric analysis on them. Cleaning and screening of sample papers, matrix construction, and visualization were performed using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and HistCite, summarizing the internal and external characteristics of the papers. With regard to external characteristics, a total of 982 research institutions in 80 regions conducted research in this field. There is extensive cooperation between the countries, and the UK, the USA, Australia, and Italy play the most active role in the cooperation network. With regard to internal characteristics, we found the two most representative citation paths: one path starts from the concerns of energy-poor groups and stops at an ethical discussion on energy poverty; the second path is based on the existing technological path, continuously developing coping policies, evaluation methods, and a conceptual framework for dealing with energy poverty. Furthermore, through coupling analysis, we discovered four focuses of energy poverty research: improvement of definition, improvement of evaluation methods, effects of coping policy, and energy justice. Through a comprehensive analysis of existing papers, this paper reveals some limitations of previous studies and recommends some promising directions for future research on energy poverty.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Liddell ◽  
Chris Morris ◽  
Barbara Gray ◽  
Anna Czerwinska ◽  
Ben Thomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa Gower

Energy vulnerability is a growing concern in many OECD countries post-millennium. An increasing number of residents go without heating or cooling necessities to manage the financial strains of increasing energy costs, low wage growth, and rising housing costs. Housing design quality contributes significantly to a dwelling's energy use and the resident's potential energy vulnerability with good orientation enabling passive climate control or, alternatively, poor design resulting in a reliance on artificial heating, cooling, and lighting for livability. Housing design regulations are accepted as an important tool in planning for achieving energy sustainability and mitigating climate change. However, this article argues for greater recognition and knowledge regarding regulation's ability to protect against energy vulnerability at the residential scale, particularly in the growing number of apartments purchased for the rental market in Australia. By observing the energy sustainability of apartments deemed permissible by Australian and UK regulations, this research demonstrates the significance of building scale in regulations when applied to apartments buildings. An energy justice lens reveals a distinction between measurement at the whole building level and the individual apartment/resident scale in this building typology in particular.


Author(s):  
Annalisa Savaresi

In recent years, measures to stimulate local and rural communities’ involvement in the generation of renewable energy have been rather optimistically promoted as a means to engender greater legitimacy in and democratization of energy governance, tackle fuel poverty, and deliver energy justice. This chapter assesses what we really know about community energy and its suitability to deliver an equitable energy transition. It scrutinizes evidence from selected EU Member States that have pioneered the mainstreaming of community energy through the lens of justice theories, with the objective to gauge whether and how these policies address core justice questions associated with the energy transition, and the role of law in providing an answer to these. This chapter aims to probe the sometimes uncritical assumptions about community energy, highlighting the complex, layered, conflicting justice claims that underlie its mainstreaming. In order to do this, the chapter distils a set of distributive, procedural, and restorative justice questions associated with community energy, and considers the way in which they have been addressed, drawing on examples from Denmark, Germany, and the UK.


2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. M. Hay ◽  
T. P. Baglin ◽  
P. W. Collins ◽  
F. G. H. Hill ◽  
D. M. Keeling

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 476-477
Author(s):  
Freddie C. Hamdy ◽  
Joanne Howson ◽  
Athene Lane ◽  
Jenny L. Donovan ◽  
David E. Neal

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
◽  
Freddie C. Hamdy ◽  
Athene Lane ◽  
David E. Neal ◽  
Malcolm Mason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
A ZAPHIRIOU ◽  
S ROBB ◽  
G MENDEZ ◽  
T MURRAYTHOMAS ◽  
S HARDMAN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document