scholarly journals Evaluation of Various Sagittal Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class I Individuals with Different Vertical Facial Growth Types

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113
Author(s):  
Gokhan Turker ◽  
Taner Ozturk ◽  
Gokhan Coban ◽  
Emin Isgandarov
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Growth Types ◽  
Cephalometric Measurements

Growth Pattern in Skeletal Class I Malocclusion: A Cephalometric Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Sujal Amatya ◽  
Rabindra Man Shrestha ◽  
Shristi Napit
Keyword(s):  
Growth Pattern ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Facial Height ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Growth Modification ◽  
Cephalometric Study

Introduction: Great emphasis has been given to the evaluation of sagittal apical base relationship in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The prediction of magnitude and direction of facial growth based on sagittal relationship will help in orthodontic treatment with growth modification. The objective of the study is to assess the growth pattern in skeletal Class I malocclusion. Materials and Method: 104 subjects (52 male and 52 female) with the age between 18-30 years with Class I skeletal relation was selected from lateral cephalograms of patients visiting the Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College. The ANB angle was measured to assess the sagittal jaw relationship and the Jarabak’s ratio to access the growth pattern. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each parameter. Pearson’s test was done to evaluate the correlation between the parameters. Independent t-test was done to compare Anterior Facial height (AFH), Posterior Facial Height (PFH) and Jarabak’s ratio between male and female subjects. Result: Among the total subjects with skeletal Class I malocclusion; hyperdivergent growth pattern was least (10.57%), followed by normodivergent (18.26%) and hypodivergent growth pattern (71.15%). Mean Jarabak’s ratio for hyperdivergent, normodivergent and hypodivergent growth pattern were 58.65±1.94, 63.98±0.85 and 69.98±4.13 respectively. Very strong correlation was found between AFH and PFH in hyperdivergent (r = 0.821) and normodivergent group (r =0.978). Strong correlation was found in hypodivergent group between AFH and PFH (r =0.743). Also, strong correlation was found in hypodivergent group between PFH and Jarabak’s ratio (r =0.643). Conclusion: Hypodivergent growth pattern was the dominant growth pattern in skeletal Class I malocclusion. PFH influenced the determination of Jarabak’s ratio more than the AFH in hypodivergent growth pattern. Hypodivergent growth pattern is correlated with large SNB angle.

scholarly journals Description of the sagittal jaw relation in cephalometric analysis - a review of the literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Jedliński ◽  
Joanna Janiszewska - Olszowska
Keyword(s):  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Lateral Cephalometry ◽  
Cephalometric Measurements

Introductionː Lateral cephalometry is commonly used to analyse craniofacial morphology, soft tissue profile and the direction of facial growth in an attempt to predict the possibilities and limits of orthodontic therapy.The aim of the study was to present the most frequently used cephalometric measurements to assess the skeletal class on a lateral cephalometric headfilm.Materials and methods: A Pubmed search was undertaken to systematize information on ANB angle, WITS appraisal, APDI and Harvold measurements. The keywords used were “cephalometry AND evaluation of sagittal malocclusion AND reference lines AND accuracy OR ANB angle OR WITS appraisal ORAPDI”. A manual search was performed from the reference lists of studies found in order to identify and include pioneer studies.Results: A total number of 1258 records were found and finally 23 studies were included in the review. Four of them were descriptive, the other 19 were randomized control trials.Conclusionsː 1. ANB angle cannot be used as the only indicator of sagittal skeletal discrepancy. 2. WITS appraisal is independent of the variability of cranial base structures, thus may be an important supplement to the diagnosis, although it depends on the variability of the occlusal plane. 3. APDI can reliably distinguish between class I, II and III malocclusions.Keywords: ANB; WITS; AF–BF; AH–BH; APDI.

scholarly journals Duration of the Pubertal Peak in Skeletal Class I and Class III Subjects

2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Kuc-Michalska ◽  
Tiziano Baccetti
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class

scholarly journals Evaluation of Cervical Posture of Adolescent Subjects in Skeletal Class I, II, and III

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerilda García ◽  
Antonio Sanhueza ◽  
Mario Cantín ◽  
Ramón Fuentes
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Cervical Posture

scholarly journals Comparison of Cervical Vertebral Body Volume in Class II Vertical and Class II Horizontal Cases With Class I Cases Using 3D-DVT

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-337
Author(s):  
Hamza Saifuddin Dargahwala ◽  
Pallavi Daigavane ◽  
Vausdevan SD ◽  
Ranjit Kamble ◽  
Sunita Shrivastav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Cervical Vertebrae ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Class I ◽  
Body Volume ◽  
Reference Structure ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cervical Vertebral Body

The branch of orthodontics has had an interest in the cervical vertebrae wherein cervical spine is used as a reference structure for natural head position, so skeletal age was evaluated by studying variations in the cervical vertebral morphologies. Among all evaluations, very limited data is available wherein comparison between cervical vertebral body volumes between the different malocclusions has been done. This study aimed to compare the differences in the volumes of cervical vertebral bodies of C2, C3, and C4 between skeletal class I and class II malocclusions of both horizontal and vertical growth patterns. In class I the volume was significantly lesser as compared to class II. It was seen that there was statistically no significant difference in the volume between the horizontal and vertical growers. It can be concluded from this study that cervical vertebral body volume has no effect on growth pattern. However, variations in cervical vertebral body volume are seen with different malocclusions.

scholarly journals PREVALENCE OF MANDIBULAR ASYMMETRY IN SKELETAL CLASS I ADULT PATIENTS

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Frazão Gribel ◽  
Guilherme Thiesen ◽  
Tássia Silvana Borges ◽  
Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Calculation Method ◽  
Significant Error ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Mandibular Asymmetry ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Significant Difference

AIM: The objective of this study was evaluating the prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal Class I adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample was composed by cone-beam computed tomography images of 250 skeletal Class I patients with age from 18 to 70 years old. The side deviation of mandibular asymmetry was evaluated (right and left), as well as the intensity of this asymmetry. People with gnathic deviation until 2mm were considered as patients with slight asymmetry; deviation between 2 and 5mm was considered moderate asymmetry and those higher than 5mm as severe asymmetries. The error calculation method was performed and there was not significant error in the measurements. To verify the association between the prevalence of mandibular asymmetry and the gender of individuals, the Χ2 was carried out and the significant level adopted was 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that mandibular deviation occurred more frequently to the left side in both genders (male 56.5% e female 58.2%), without statistically significant difference between them (p=0.792). Besides, the prevalence of slight, moderate and severe asymmetries were, respectively 61%, 27% and 12% for males and 54%, 28% and 18% for female; and there was not statistically significant difference (p=0.366) between the gender of the sample evaluated. CONCLUSION: In this study, both deviation and intensity of mandibular asymmetry did not present preference regarding to the gender.

scholarly journals Anatomical characteristics of mandibular bone in skeletal Class I, II and III patients by using cone beam computed tomography images in an iranian population

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zandi ◽  
Abbas Shokri ◽  
Vahid Mollabashi ◽  
Zahed Eghdami ◽  
Payam Amini
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Anatomical Characteristics ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Ramus Height

Objetive: This study aimed to compare the anatomical characteristics of the mandible in patients with skeletal class I, II and class III disorders using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: CBCT scans of patients between 17 to 40 years taken with NewTom 3G CBCT system with 12-inch field of view (FOV) were selected from the archive. Lateral cephalograms were obtained from CBCT scans of patients, and type of skeletal malocclusion was determined (Class I, II or III). All CBCT scans were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes using the N.N.T viewer software. Results: The ramus height and distance from the mandibular foramen to the sigmoid notch in class II patients were significantly different from those in skeletal class I (P < 0.005). Distance from the mandibular canal to the anterior border of ramus in class III individuals was significantly different from that in skeletal class I individuals (P < .005). Conclusion: Length of the body of mandible in skeletal class I was significantly different from that in skeletal class II and III patients. Also, ramus height in skeletal class I was significantly different from that in skeletal class II patients. CBCT had high efficacy for accurate identification of anatomical landmarks.   Keywords Prognathism; Retrognathism; Mandible; Anatomy; Cone beam computed tomography.

scholarly journals Evaluation of tongue posture & dimensions in relation to skeletal Class I and Class II patterns- A cephalometric study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Puja Khanna ◽  
Sumit Chhabra ◽  
Preeti Munjal ◽  
Sunny Mittal ◽  
Nishtha Arora
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Association of tongue posture with dental and facial skeletal pattern have been suggested in past. This study was undertaken to assess tongue posture and dimensions in Class I and Class II Dentoskeletal patterns to determine whether any correlation exists between tongue posture and skeletal pattern of an individual. Cephalograms of 150 individuals (aged 18-23 years), taken in Natural Head Position (NHP) and tongue at rest were divided into three groups i.e. Group 1 – Class I Normal occlusion, Group 2 – Class II Division 1 Normodivergent and Group 3 – Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent, consisting of 50 samples each. To ensure the rest position of tongue, patient was asked to relax for 30 seconds after coating the tongue with barium sulphate in midline and then to swallow, and the X-ray was taken at the end of swallowing. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to sex. Groups were constituted according to the Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA) angle. The subjects who had skeletal Class II pattern due to mandibular retrusion and not due to maxillary prognathism were only included in the study group. Statistical analysis was done using the software SPSS version 21.0. The statistical tests used were unpaired t-test and One-way ANOVA test with post-hoc bonferroni test. The p-value was considered significant if less than 0.05.The dorsum of the tongue was higher at back and lower in front in Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent group as compared to Class I Normal occlusion group (P&#60;.05). Tongue height and tongue length were significantly reduced in Class II Division 1 Normodivergent and Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent malocclusion groups when compared to Class I control group (P&#60;.05).The study supports the existence of a relationship between posture & dimensions of the tongue with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document