scholarly journals KHẢ NĂNG CHI TRẢ CỦA SINH VIÊN Y - DƯỢC ĐỐI VỚI MỘT SỐ VẮC-XIN PHÒNG NGỪA DỊCH BỆNH

2022 ◽  
Vol 509 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Đinh Tú Quyên ◽  
Võ Quang Trung ◽  
Trần Vinh Quang ◽  
Võ Văn Bảy ◽  
Nguyễn Thị Huyền Trâm
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment

Mục tiêu: Khảo sát khả năng chi trả của sinh viên ydược đối với một số vắc-xin phòng ngừa dịch bệnh tại Khoa Y, Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Đối tượng nghiên cứu: Sinh viên Yvà sinh viên Dược đang học tại Khoa Y, Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Phương pháp: Nghiên cứu cắt ngang mô tả từ tháng 01 tháng 07/2021, sử dụng phương pháp lựa chọn rời rạc (Discrete choice experiment, DCE), thông qua các câu hỏi gián tiếp để xác định ngưỡng chi trả tương ứng với các đặc tính của vắc-xin. Bên cạnh đó, mô hình tiện ích ngẫu nhiên với hồi quy logistic được áp dụng để phân tích ngưỡng chi trả và các yếu tố liên quan. Kết quả: Tổng cộng có 318 sinh viên tham gia khảo sát thỏa tiêu chí lựa chọn, đưa ra 15.264 lựa chọn vắc-xin với những đặc tính khác nhau ứng với bamức độ dịch bệnh. Ngưỡng chi trả phụ thuộc vào các đặc tính của vắc-xin như hiệu quả vắc-xin, thời gian bảo vệ, khuyến cáo của báo chí và cơ quan y tế. Kết luận: Ngưỡng chi trả có sự khác biệt rõ rệt giữa các trường hợp lựa chọn vắc xin khác nhau, phụ thuộc vào các đặc tính của vắc-xin và mức độ của bệnh.

The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment.

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (7) ◽  
pp. 1243-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Roach ◽  
Bruce K. Christensen ◽  
Elizabeth Rieger
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Research Supervision

INDIVIDUALS' PREFERENCES FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Peters ◽  
E van Grinsven ◽  
M van de Haterd ◽  
D van Lankveld ◽  
J Verbakel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Screening Strategies

Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel C. Mühlbacher ◽  
John F. P. Bridges ◽  
Susanne Bethge ◽  
Ch.-Markos Dintsios ◽  
Anja Schwalm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Antiviral Therapy ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment

Patient preferences for specialist outpatient video consultations: A discrete choice experiment

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110228
Author(s):  
Centaine L Snoswell ◽  
Anthony C Smith ◽  
Matthew Page ◽  
Liam J Caffery
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioner ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
General Practitioner Practice ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Time Away ◽  
Out Of Pocket Costs

Introduction Telehealth has been shown to improve access to care, reduce personal expenses and reduce the need for travel. Despite these benefits, patients may be less inclined to seek a telehealth service, if they consider it inferior to an in-person encounter. The aims of this study were to identify patient preferences for attributes of a healthcare service and to quantify the value of these attributes. Methods We surveyed patients who had taken an outpatient telehealth consult in the previous year using a survey that included a discrete choice experiment. We investigated patient preferences for attributes of healthcare delivery and their willingness to pay for out-of-pocket costs. Results Patients ( n = 62) preferred to have a consultation, regardless of type, than no consultation at all. Patients preferred healthcare services with lower out-of-pocket costs, higher levels of perceived benefit and less time away from usual activities ( p < 0.008). Most patients preferred specialist care over in-person general practitioner care. Their order of preference to obtain specialist care was a videoconsultation into the patient’s local general practitioner practice or hospital ( p < 0.003), a videoconsultation into the home, and finally travelling for in-person appointment. Patients were willing to pay out-of-pocket costs for attributes they valued: to be seen by a specialist over videoconference ($129) and to reduce time away from usual activities ($160). Conclusion Patients value specialist care, lower out-of-pocket costs and less time away from usual activities. Telehealth is more likely than in-person care to cater to these preferences in many instances.

scholarly journals Understanding what women want: eliciting preference for delivery health facility in a rural subcounty in Kenya, a discrete choice experiment

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038865
Author(s):  
Jackline Oluoch-Aridi ◽  
Mary B Adam ◽  
Francis Wafula ◽  
Gilbert Kokwaro
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Home Delivery ◽  
Process Indicator ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Women’S Preferences

ObjectiveTo identify what women want in a delivery health facility and how they rank the attributes that influence the choice of a place of delivery.DesignA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit rural women’s preferences for choice of delivery health facility. Data were analysed using a conditional logit model to evaluate the relative importance of the selected attributes. A mixed multinomial model evaluated how interactions with sociodemographic variables influence the choice of the selected attributes.SettingSix health facilities in a rural subcounty.ParticipantsWomen aged 18–49 years who had delivered within 6 weeks.Primary outcomeThe DCE required women to select from hypothetical health facility A or B or opt-out alternative.ResultsA total of 474 participants were sampled, 466 participants completed the survey (response rate 98%). The attribute with the strongest association with health facility preference was having a kind and supportive healthcare worker (β=1.184, p<0.001), second availability of medical equipment and drug supplies (β=1.073, p<0.001) and third quality of clinical services (β=0.826, p<0.001). Distance, availability of referral services and costs were ranked fourth, fifth and sixth, respectively (β=0.457, p<0.001; β=0.266, p<0.001; and β=0.000018, p<0.001). The opt-out alternative ranked last suggesting a disutility for home delivery (β=−0.849, p<0.001).ConclusionThe most highly valued attribute was a process indicator of quality of care followed by technical indicators. Policymakers need to consider women’s preferences to inform strategies that are person centred and lead to improvements in quality of care during delivery.

scholarly journals Which Bag? Predicting Consumer Preferences for a Luxury Product With a Discrete Choice Experiment

2021 ◽  
pp. 183933492199950
Author(s):  
Canie K.Y. Chu Lo ◽  
Suzan Burton ◽  
Regan Lam ◽  
Paul Nesbit
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Consumer Preferences ◽  
Conspicuous Consumption ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Luxury Brands ◽  
Chinese Consumers ◽  
Enormous Amount ◽  
Luxury Products

Limited research has described a segment of consumers who prefer subtly branded luxury products, rather than conspicuous consumption. However, in comparison with the enormous amount of research mentioning conspicuous consumption, there has been only very limited research into “inconspicuous consumption,” leading to calls for more research in the area. In this article, we describe a discrete choice experiment examining the luxury product preferences of Chinese consumers, the largest market segment for luxury products. We describe and test a theoretical model investigating how product characteristics (logo prominence, price, and brand), peers’ attitudes and behaviors, and other individual characteristics influence consumers’ choice of a luxury bag. For each brand, a prominent logo was preferred, but a very large minority preferred a subtle logo. However, the effect of price, attitudinal and social factors varied across luxury brands. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document