Diaspora phenomena, it?s characteristics and functions, were changing in a
resent decade along with momentum of globalization notably. This requires
new research approaches. Unlike a previous period when migrants visited
their homelands rarely or never, they came more often today. They contact
with friends and family nearly every day. Because of that, relationships
besides members of diaspora and their Motherland is changed. Communications
besides migrants and nonmigrants in the homeland make transnational networks
which enable that migrants investing their resources without need for return
and has a big potential for a Motherland?s prosperity. Intensivity of
migrations in a every part of the world have impact to expanding migrants
social networks (social capital become bigger) and acquiring a new knowledge
(their human capital became bigger). That is reason for interest of policy
makers became greather for human and social capital although it was only for
monetary remittance earlier. New knowledge and technology application
together with consultation with experts all around the world are available
for the Motherland because diasporas social capital. They could be very
important resource for its economically, cultural and social prosperity.
However, it?s important to know that interaction with a people with a
different culture has impact to change and experience of personal identity
by migrants. That requires modification of earlier understanding identity
members of diaspora. Theirs identity had a core in a national identity
earlier, but today it has a form of hybridity. In a meso level, respecting
by Motherland perspective, that?s mean that national identity doesn?t main
motive for diaspora investing anymore and that?s important to make a new
stimulating migration policy. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to point
diaspora phenomena changing - change resources and influence to the
Motherland. As a first, the emphasis is on transnational networks which
change communication mode and relationship members of diaspora and
Motherland, but they have impact to growth of social capital of migrants
which could be invested in homeland potentially. These networks enable
easier to acquire a knowledge and it?s transfer. That is why human capital
become more readily available for the Motherland. But, hybrid diaspora
identity must be motive for change state diaspora policy which was based in
an emotional component of national identity. They must change in way of
making a more favorable structural conditions for diaspora investment which
is a preconditions to attracting human and social capital of diaspora that
could have a big impact to the Motherland?s progress.