scholarly journals Deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities: regulatory issues and law enforcement practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 234 (11) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
SERGEY A. PICHUGIN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to various aspects of the regulation and execution of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The subject of the article is the norms of the current domestic legislation, data from official statistics of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, as well as law enforcement practice on the topic under consideration. The purpose of the article is to analyze the normative regulation and practice of applying punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The methodological basis of the research is represented by a set of general and specific scientific methods. The work used methods such as analysis, synthesis, formal legal, statistical. As a result of the study, proposals were formulated to amend the current legislation in terms of improving preventive work with persons sentenced to punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. Conclusions are made about the essence, features of legal regulation and law enforcement practice of the considered type of punishment in modern conditions, about the need to increase the effectiveness of preventive activities in relation to persons sentenced to punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to driving a vehicle. Key words: deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities, punishment, penal inspectorates, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, convict, deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to driving.

scholarly journals Features of signs of the crime object provided by article 166 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-198
Author(s):  
Алена Харламова ◽  
Alena Kharlamova ◽  
Юлия Белик ◽  
Yuliya Belik
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Direct Object ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the problematic theoretical and practical issues of the content of the signs of the object of the crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code. The authors determined the main direct object, revealed the essence of the right of ownership, use and disposal. Marked social relations that can act as an optional direct object. Particular attention is paid in the article to the subject of the crime. Attempts have been made to establish criteria that are crucial for the recognition of any vehicle as the subject of theft. The content of the terms “automobile” and “other vehicle” is disclosed. The analysis of the conformity of the literal interpretation of the criminal law to the interpretation of the law enforcer is carried out. It is summarized that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation narrows the meaning of the term “other vehicle”, including in it only vehicles for the management of which, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, is granted a special right. The authors provide a list of such vehicles and formulate a conclusion on the advisability of specifying them as the subject of a crime. The narration of the article is accompanied by examples of decisions of courts of various instances in cases of crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

scholarly journals On the peculiarities of the regional lawmaking process

2020 ◽  
pp. 25-38
Author(s):  
Olga Anatolevna Fomicheva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Process Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
The Right

The subject of this research is practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation applied in legal regulation of lawmaking process. Analysis is conducted on legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the establishment of their rights to realization of the legislative initiative. The author’s arguments on carrying out the analysis of regional legislation with regards to establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative are grounded on the scholars’ opinion that the status of the subject of realization of legislative initiative is special. The fact of recognition of the subject of lawmaking process as a subject of legislative initiative is a juridical fact bot only for acquisition of the right to introduction of a bill, but also guarantees for participation in lawmaking process of the parliament. Therefore, establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative is crucial in determination of peculiarities of the regional lawmaking process. Application of the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, allowed arranging the circle of the subjects of lawmaking process into groups, as well as formulate a conclusion on the specificities of setting rules for the lawmaking process realized in constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The philosophical methods of cognition of legal reality allowed determining the general rules of lawmaking process, summarize the acquired data, and comprehensively examine the research materials. Having analyzed the practice of legal regulation, the author identified the flaws in terminology used in practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Recommendations are made to pay closer attention to ambiguity of legislation in some regions of the Russian Federation. A conclusion is formulated on the positive experience that can become an example for other constituent entities of the Russian Federation in setting rules for the lawmaking process.

scholarly journals The Concept of Freedom of Enterprise Through the Prism of Criminal Law Characteristics of Fraud

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Yakimova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activities

The research of issues connected with the analysis of business risks is relevant because of the problem of qualifying the actions of entrepreneurs under the fraud-related Articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Besides, the development of technologies increases the number of frauds in the digital environment, which makes it necessary to determine key features of fraudulent actions connected with the changes in the economic organization of the society connected with the digital transformation of some branches of the world economy in general and Russian economy in particular, of the social sphere, and of the specifics of public administration of some areas of life. The responsiveness of lawmakers manifested in amending a group of Articles in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation regarding the legal characteristics of fraud, shows that there are some problems in the legislative regulation of this sphere. The author believes that they are caused by an attempt to assess the degree of freedom of enterprise and the degree of involvement of each side of legal relations in the risk of investment. The analysis of legislation, the law enforcement practice, statistical data give reason to believe that most of the problems of legislative understanding of fraud in entrepreneurship are not connected with contradictions in the legal regulation, but rather with the drawbacks of the law enforcement practice, the prevalence of repressive methodology in classifying the actions of entrepreneurs and the inner conviction of the law enforcement employees that entrepreneurs intentionally strive to obtain negative results in any, and primarily entrepreneurial, activities. The author argues that further improvement of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will not yield any tangible results, which testifies to a considerable transformation of the fraud-related Articles in the last 15 years. Changes in the practice of enforcement of the criminal law’s articles regarding fraud are only possible after the principles of such work are worked out by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, who at present pays much attention to this issue, although some clauses of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation require further analysis and improvement.

scholarly journals Delimitation of frauds in the sphere of crediting (Article 1591 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) from illegal credit receiving (Article 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Екатерина Алёшина-Алексеева ◽  
Ekaterina Aleshina-Alexeeva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Economic Crime ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Enforcement Activity

The main criteria of differentiation of the crimes provided by Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from Article 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are considered in the article. The scientific and theoretical relevance of the subject is covered in the literature. In the present article the author delimited, in her opinion, illegal credit receiving from fraud in the sphere of crediting. The research objective is to formulate specific proposals concerning the solution of the problems of qualification of the crimes provided by Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from Article 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation connected with their differentiation. The research methods used are: the analysis of theoretical literature and judicial and investigative practice, the comparative and legal analysis (features of the criminal liability regulation according to Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), monitoring of the printed and electronic media material. The author focuses attention that fraud in the sphere of crediting cannot be considered as an economic crime in the sphere of crediting based on the revealed signs. Elimination of the qualification problems is suggested by means of adopting the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation which will contain the main explanations on the studied criminal actions. The practical value of the work consists in the possibility of its use in a law-enforcement activity in qualification of the crimes provided by Articles 159.1 and 176 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and besides, while teaching of the Criminal Law.

Joint bankruptcy of spouses: theory and practice issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 271-280
Author(s):  
Irina E. Belova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

We research the issue of the current law enforcement practice of considering cases of joint bankruptcy of spouses in the framework of insolvency procedures of individuals. We emphasize that at the legislative level, joint bankruptcy of spouses and multiple persons on the debtor’s side is not provided for. Initially, this resulted in a lack of courts’ uniform approach, which has become a subject of discussion in the scientific literature. In this context, we pay attention to the importance of adoption by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of position on the combining admissibility of spouses’ banknote cases. In turn, the permissibility of combining cases did not resolve the issue of possibility of accepting a joint bankruptcy application, which again led to discrepancies in judicial practice. Special attention is paid to the admissibility of combining cases, which is the right of the court, and not its duty. We note that the arbitration courts, when solving this issue, study such circumstances as the subject composition of the persons participating in the cases of debtors, the volume and nature of prop-erty that is part of the bankruptcy estate of each debtor’s property, the per-formance of duties of financial manager by the same person. Despite the de-veloping judicial practice of joint bankruptcy of spouses, justified by the ex-planations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, we believe that it expedient and necessary to establish the grounds, procedure and conditions for joint bankruptcy of individuals who are spouses at the legislative level.

CRIMINAL LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE INVOLVEMENT OF MINORS IN THE EXTREMIST CRIMES

2021 ◽  
pp. 41-46
Author(s):  
Динара Мансуровна Латыпова
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legislative Regulation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье проведен анализ видов преступлений экстремистской направленности, обоснована актуальность исследования составов. В рамках рассмотрения темы исследуются вопросы квалификации вовлечения несовершеннолетних в совершение преступлений экстремистской направленности. Анализируются проблемные вопросы толкования понятий рассматриваемой темы, законодательная регламентация, пробелы правового регулирования. Анализ объективных и субъективных признаков двух групп преступлений - вовлечения несовершеннолетних в совершение преступлений и преступлений экстремистской направленности - обеспечил возможность выявить специфику и особенности квалификации таких деяний. Исследованы правила квалификации вовлечения несовершеннолетних в преступления экстремистской направленности, выведенные из соотношения элементов исследуемых составов преступлений. Рассматриваются вопросы окончания преступных деяний, особенности определения признаков субъекта, а также особенности признаков объективной стороны составов. Сделаны выводы о проблемах и опасности преступлений экстремистской направленности на основе теоретического понимания вопроса в его соотношении с материалами правоприменительной практики, а также об особой опасности вовлечения в экстремизм несовершеннолетних. На основе выявленной проблематики вопроса обозначена необходимость дополнения постановлений Пленума Верховного суда РФ разъяснениями по вопросам вовлечения несовершеннолетних в экстремизм. The article analyzes the types of crimes of extremist orientation, substantiates the relevance of the study of the compositions. As part of the consideration of the topic, the issues of qualification of involving minors in the commission of extremist groups are being investigated. Problematic issues of interpretation of the concepts of the topic under consideration, legislative regulation, gaps in legal regulation are analyzed. Analysis of the objective and subjective signs of two groups of crimes - the involvement of minors in the commission of crimes and extremist crimes made it possible to identify the specifics of the involvement of minors in the commission of extremist crimes and the specifics of the qualification of such acts. The rules for qualifying the involvement of minors in crimes of an extremist orientation, derived from the ratio of elements of the investigated corpus delicti, have been investigated. The article examines the issues of ending criminal acts, as well as the specifics of determining the characteristics of the subject. Conclusions are made about the problems and danger of extremist crimes on the basis of a theoretical understanding of the issue in its relation to the materials of law enforcement practice, as well as the special danger of involving minors in extremism. On the basis of the identified problematics of the issue, it is indicated that it is necessary to supplement the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on extremist cases with clarifications on the involvement of minors in their commission.

scholarly journals Jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nikolay Basmanov ◽  
Andrei Vladimirovich Ilin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article discusses the question of territorial jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions (Russian Federation, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipal formations). The subject of this research is the current procedural norms regulating the questions of jurisdiction, and the established law enforcement practice. Attention is turned to the existence of gaps in legal regulation of the question of jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The authors analyze the established approaches in law enforcement practice towards solution of the aforementioned problem. Methodological framework includes the comparative-legal method and such formal-logical methods, as analysis, synthesis and induction. The relevance and practical importance are substantiated by the subject of research – the law enforcement practice formed by the Russian judicial authorities over the recent years. The conclusion is made on the need for elimination of the existing gap in the normative-legal regulation by amending the current procedural legislation.

scholarly journals Some Issues of Qualification of the Hijacking of an Aircraft, a Sea-Going Ship, or a Railway Train (Article 211 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-376
Author(s):  
Denis Kraev
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Water Transport ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Rolling Stock ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Railway Rolling Stock

The article is devoted to the problems of qualification of hijacking of an aircraft, a sea-going ship, or a railway train, provided for by Art. 211 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Despite the fact that Art. 211 has been present in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation since its adoption, it should be noted that there is a lack of theoretical research on its analysis, as well as the existence in court practice of the difficulties of applying this norm (in addition, Federal Law No. 130 of May 5, 2014 -FZ in Art. 211 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation a new Part 4 was introduced, providing for liability for the combination of hijacking of a ship of air or water transport or railway rolling stock with a terrorist act or other terrorist second activity that, in the absence of specific explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court, has created additional challenges for law-qualification). This determines the relevance of the chosen topic. Analyzing the current legislation, the provisions of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated December 9, 2008 No. 25 “On judicial practice in cases of crimes related to violation of the rules of the road and the operation of vehicles, as well as their unlawful seizure without the purpose of theft”, scientific positions and court decisions on these issues, the author comes to the following conclusions that seem interesting for theory and practice. Small boats of water transport relate to the subject of hijacking of a ship of air or water transport or railway rolling stock, and the commission of a crime under Part 4 of Art. 211 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the associated terrorist act, requires qualification in the aggregate of Part 4 of Art. 211 and Art. 205 of the Criminal Code. Military aircraft and boats, submarines, etc.) are also the subject of a crime under Art. 211 of the Criminal Code. The of hijacking of an aircraft, a sea-going ship, or a railway train, as well as the seizure of such a ship or train for the purpose of hijacking, associated with the murder, assault on the life of a law enforcement officer, person conducting justice or preliminary investigation, a state or public figure are qualified in the aggregate of Art. 211 and Art. 105, Art. 277, Art. 295, Art. 317 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. When of hijacking of an aircraft, a sea-going ship, or a railway train, as well as hijacking such a ship or train for the purpose of hijacking, committed with the use of violence dangerous to the life or health of the victim, or with the threat of such violence, in addition to item “c” of Part 2 of Art. 211 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of additional qualification in parts 1, 2 of Art. 111, Art. 112, Art. 115, Art. 117, Art. 119 of the Criminal Code is not required. The of hijacking of an aircraft, a sea-going ship, or a railway train is often fraught with violation of the traffic safety rules and operation of the relevant transport provided for in Art. 263 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: the deed is covered by Art. 211 of the Criminal Code, if the violation specified in Art. 263 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation expressed itself in theft; if not, qualification is possible in the aggregate of art. 211,263 of the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals Administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to the government bodies in the Ural Federal District: the peculiarities of legal regulation

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-46
Author(s):  
Stanislav Vladimirovich Kalashnikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Mechanism

The subject of this this research is the normative legal and legal acts of the government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District (Kurgan, Sverdlovsk, Tyumen, Chelyabinsk regions, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Ugra and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug) that regulate the administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to the government bodies in the indicated regions. Special  attention is given to the importance and need for legal regulation of the issues associated with arranging additional guarantees and exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies, particularly on the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the aforementioned normative legal act and legal acts, the author reveals the peculiarities of legal regulation of the administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District, the limits of norm-setting authorities of the listed regions of the Russian Federation, specificities of securing additional guarantees of the rights of citizens to appeal to government bodies in the corresponding regional laws, approaches towards consolidation of the categorical and conceptual apparatus, determination of parties to legal relations in the area of exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies, the role of normative legal and legal acts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District within the mechanism of exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies. The conclusion is formulated on the prospect of the approaches of certain constituent entities of the Russian Federation towards legal regulation of the mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal government. The author also makes recommendation for its improvement.

scholarly journals Administrative Responsibility as a Means of Protection of Patent (Inventor’s) Rights in the Russian Federation: Some Issues of Legal Regulation

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
N. A. Kulakov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The purpose of the research paper is to study the problems of legal regulation of administrative liability in the field of patent law. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to the conclusion that administrative responsibility as a means of legal protection of patent rights possesses significant potential capacity. However, a number of factors do not allow this potential to be enforced to the necessary extent. The author enumerates the following factors: latency of administrative offenses in the field of the patent legislation and lack of confidence of rights’ holders in law enforcement agencies in this area; low level of legal qualification of law enforcement officials in the field of the patent legislation; problems of the normative and legal regulation of administrative liability for infringement of patent rights. The author sees the solution to the problem of increasing the efficiency of administrative responsibility in the field of the patent legislation as a complex counteraction to the above factors. Within the framework of the paper special attention is paid to the problems of legal regulation of administrative liability in the field of patent legislation. The author analyzes Para 2 of Art. 7.12 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, which provides for liability for violation of patent and inventor’s rights. The author comes to the conclusion about the need to develop this legal rule and defines a number of proposals for amending the current legislation. In addition, in order to ensure a comprehensive and effective protection of the right to remuneration for an invention (utility model, industrial design), a proposal has been formulated to expand the jurisdiction of the federal labor inspectorate and introduce the consequential amendments to the secondary legislation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document